FOT Forum

FOT Community => General Discussion => Topic started by: Jason on August 22, 2007, 12:34:59 AM

Title: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Jason on August 22, 2007, 12:34:59 AM
Thamks to all the late might chatters who acmomodated my meeds so. It was a mice gesture amd will mot be quickly forgottem.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: evan (giggles) on August 22, 2007, 12:36:07 AM
mever im my emtire life have i beem more compassiomate towards someome so meedy. you are very much welcome, jasom.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Dan B on August 22, 2007, 12:37:49 AM
Mo problem jasom.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: evan (giggles) on August 22, 2007, 12:40:52 AM
my omly satisfactiom comes from kmowimg my recommemdatiom of "m" was a fimer selectiom tham "u"
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Stan on August 22, 2007, 12:42:33 AM
Mever forget. Mever.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Josh on August 22, 2007, 12:48:58 AM
jasom you've dome so much for this commumity amd all of its members amd for me persomally. i cam do mo less tham to help you whemever the opportumity presemts itself. you thamk you, friemd of mime.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Dorvid Barnas on August 22, 2007, 01:08:27 AM
You guys are so drumk.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Sarah on August 22, 2007, 01:18:32 AM
Hey, you cam't be emtirely drumk amd still remember to replace "m"s with "m"s.  But whem dam b said we were replacing "b"s with "d"s (or the reverse), that got a little tricky.  Thamk god we gave up om that quickly.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Stan on August 22, 2007, 01:33:36 AM
Hey, you cam't be emtirely drumk amd still remember to replace "m"s with "m"s.  But whem dam b said we were replacing "b"s with "d"s (or the reverse), that got a little tricky.  Thamk god we gave up om that quickly.

 Yeah. Fuck that moise.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: evan (giggles) on August 22, 2007, 01:41:16 AM
oh how umfortumate for me! i'm sorry i wasm't aroumd for b's and d's. perchamce mext time!
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: John Junk on August 22, 2007, 03:45:49 AM
I dom't get it.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Richard_From_CHI on August 22, 2007, 07:59:53 AM
Jasom,

I coulm't chat for lomg, but it was a pleasure to rum imto you.

I heart the mew chat.

Richard
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Deric W. Haircare on August 22, 2007, 08:44:59 AM
Famtastic job rumming the phomes last might, Jasom. Keep it up and you'll be associate to the associate producer before lomg.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: dave from knoxville on August 22, 2007, 09:42:14 AM
You woulb thimk it woulb de boudle troudle, dut it’s really mot so dab switchimg pairs of letters, it’s the dlambest trick im the degimmimg programmer’s didle.

Too merdy?

bave from kmoxville
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Richard_From_CHI on August 22, 2007, 10:26:27 AM
This whole thread is pretty effing merdy.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Sarah on August 22, 2007, 11:03:10 AM
You should've seem the chat.  Oy.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Richard_From_CHI on August 22, 2007, 01:28:16 PM
Unseemly.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: evan (giggles) on August 22, 2007, 01:56:52 PM
Unseemly.

correctiom: umseemly.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Richard_From_CHI on August 22, 2007, 01:58:30 PM
I stamd corrected.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Laurie on August 22, 2007, 02:08:37 PM
What's goimg om here?
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Emily on August 22, 2007, 02:16:17 PM
let me guess!

jason's keyboard was switching letters?  -- the "n" working or it was appearing as a "u". Then Dan B suggested that "m" was better than "u" so everyone in the chat made the effort to switch all their "n's with m's" so Jason would feel more comfortable. Then someone suggested switching "d's and b's" but that was too complicated for that time of day.

either that or they were trying to spice up acrowars by adding another challenge to meet under the time constraints.

Close?
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Josh on August 22, 2007, 02:38:38 PM
Close?
Mo.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Emily on August 22, 2007, 03:02:45 PM
drat.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Sarah on August 22, 2007, 03:06:11 PM
I disagree, Josh.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Laurie on August 22, 2007, 03:17:27 PM
Color me comfused.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Emily on August 22, 2007, 04:21:29 PM
could it be:

jason was doing some programming/coding stuff (either having to do with the old/new chat or reconfiguring some weird settings associate producer mike had arranged) but ran into some issue involving n's and u's so he came to the remaining chatters for help? & m's were a viable solution? (i don't know enough about coding to speculate further on n/u/m's), and them everyome had a mice big laugh about the phometical substitutiom?

or maybe the chat itself was substituting letters and the switch was an effort on part of the chatters to rectify this?

oh i don't know. i should be writing a cover letter.

its just a shot in the dark.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: moonshake on August 22, 2007, 04:50:51 PM
[youtube=425,350]si6G0pSzOfY[/youtube]
.
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: evan (giggles) on August 22, 2007, 06:10:16 PM
could it be:

jason was doing some programming/coding stuff (either having to do with the old/new chat or reconfiguring some weird settings associate producer mike had arranged) but ran into some issue involving n's and u's so he came to the remaining chatters for help? & m's were a viable solution? (i don't know enough about coding to speculate further on n/u/m's), and them everyome had a mice big laugh about the phometical substitutiom?

or maybe the chat itself was substituting letters and the switch was an effort on part of the chatters to rectify this?

oh i don't know. i should be writing a cover letter.

its just a shot in the dark.


im fact it was much simpler tham you are maikimg it out to be. techmology cam be such a drag!
Title: Re: Thamks to the late might chatters.
Post by: Laurie on August 22, 2007, 10:39:15 PM
Cam someome please explaim what happemed? In simple Emglish? Imquirimg ninds meed to kmow!

Thamks!