Red House Painters/Sun Kil Moon/Mark Kozelek
Battles, Babyshambles, Kings Of Leon, whatever is the newest Mars Volta/Coheed and Cambria pothead garbage.
Battles, Babyshambles, Kings Of Leon, whatever is the newest Mars Volta/Coheed and Cambria pothead garbage.
Okay, clearly you're not down with prog-leaning bands, but Battles has no rightful place on your list. That record is the jam.
I've tried to like Tom Waits before.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
[/quote]Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
O.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
nice job, people!QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!
Ha! Silly me! Now I forgot to actually type it in! Ha ha ha! :D
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!
:'(
I call for a thread do-over.
This may be a new haikuDisplaying device
It's exceedingly well framedThis may be a new haikuDisplaying device
It's exceedingly well framedThis may be a new haikuDisplaying device
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!
Ha! Silly me! Now I forgot to actually type it in! Ha ha ha! :D
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!
:'(
I'm missing the Guinness thing. Did they endorse some Met exhibit? Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?I call for a thread do-over.
Ian, it seems so... inadequate now. Doesn't it?
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!
Ha! Silly me! Now I forgot to actually type it in! Ha ha ha! :D
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!
:'(
I'm missing the Guinness thing. Did they endorse some Met exhibit? Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?I call for a thread do-over.
Ian, it seems so... inadequate now. Doesn't it?
I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.
And I have a vague memory that the company is owned by a very right-wing Irish Protestant with close ties to the Tories, or at least it was - maybe The Baffler wrote about it in the 90s?
I do sometimes like Guinness, though.
In any case, I wouldn't be surprised if Barney was referencing the beer trademark and not the Irish national musical instrument - product placement would seem right at home in his work.
QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!
Ha! Silly me! Now I forgot to actually type it in! Ha ha ha! :D
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!
:'(
I'm missing the Guinness thing. Did they endorse some Met exhibit? Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?I call for a thread do-over.
Ian, it seems so... inadequate now. Doesn't it?
I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.
No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).
Guinness tastes like ass. I drink Yuengling because it's kind of spicy and Blue Moon because it's kind of fruity. I'm a girl. Oh, and if neither of those are available, which is often the case in Miami, I get Heineken, because that's the only fucking option. I'm not drinking Budweiser.
Interesting about the isinglas. Hell, interesting to learn that meaning of isinglass (I was only familiar with the mica variation). I think you should host a regular feature, "Ask a Vegan," to clear up these matters for the ignorant among us (such as I). For example, there's my french fry question of a while back: why are they not vegan as long as they're cooked in a vegetable oil?
I think you should have stayed in that bar, though. Could have been great.
Paul? I think this thread is very close to a regular conversation, which means that it's about anything, everything, and nothing.
Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other threadQuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!
Ha! Silly me! Now I forgot to actually type it in! Ha ha ha! :D
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!
:'(
I'm missing the Guinness thing. Did they endorse some Met exhibit? Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?I call for a thread do-over.
Ian, it seems so... inadequate now. Doesn't it?
I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.
No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).
what's this thread about?
. . . and therefore could easily have wound up on the receiving end of it at some point later in the evening...
Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other threadQuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Really?Quote
Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!Quote
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!QuoteTom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!
Ha! Silly me! Now I forgot to actually type it in! Ha ha ha! :D
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!
:'(
I'm missing the Guinness thing. Did they endorse some Met exhibit? Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?I call for a thread do-over.
Ian, it seems so... inadequate now. Doesn't it?
I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.
No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).
what's this thread about?
[
#msg19246 date=1195152546]Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other thread:PQuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]Quote from: Forrest link=topic=1486.msg19246c=1486.msg19019#msg19019 date=1194989599[quote author. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comm
Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]273 date=1195157050]Quote from: Forrest link=topic=1486.msg19246c=1486.msg19019#msg19019 date=1194989599[quote author. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radioheadents elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
Really?Quote
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!QuoteWell said!
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
[/quote]Quoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:[/u]QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!
??? :DQuote[/s]
Robert Pollard needs an editor, To :-Xm Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!Quote[/right]
Tom Waits also needs some face cream. [/color] Spo :( ???t on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spo :( ???t on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet love :Ds them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell rele :-* :-* :o :o :-* :-*ased a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, [/i] agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!
Ha! Silly me! Now I forgot to actually type it in! Ha ha ha! :D
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!
:'(
I'm missing the Guinness thing. Did they endorse some Met exhibit? Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?I call for a thread do-over.
Ian, it seems so... inadequate now. Doesn't it?
I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.
No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).
what's this thread about?
REEEEEEEEMIX!!!!!!
[
#msg19246 date=1195152546]Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other thread:PQuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]Quote from: Forrest link=topic=1486.msg19246c=1486.msg19019#msg19019 date=1194989599[quote author. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comm
Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]273 date=1195157050]Quote from: Forrest link=topic=1486.msg19246c=1486.msg19019#msg19019 date=1194989599[quote author. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radioheadents elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.
I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awful. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. But it's just that they're not particularly good at it. Their music is so lifeless sounding.
Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music. What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.
Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.
Feud over on my end, ok?
When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature. You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.
That's my 2 cents on this issue.
Do what now?
Ditto!
Really?Quote
I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!QuoteWell said!
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
[/quote]Quoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:[/u]QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Totally!!
??? :DQuote[/s]
Robert Pollard needs an editor, To :-Xm Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!Quote[/right]
Tom Waits also needs some face cream. [/color] Spo :( ???t on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spo :( ???t on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet love :Ds them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell rele :-* :-* :o :o :-* :-*ased a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.
Right?
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, [/i] agree with others.
I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.
I see your point, but I also see other points too.
Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!
Ha! Silly me! Now I forgot to actually type it in! Ha ha ha! :D
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!
:'(
I'm missing the Guinness thing. Did they endorse some Met exhibit? Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?I call for a thread do-over.
Ian, it seems so... inadequate now. Doesn't it?
I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.
No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).
what's this thread about?
REEEEEEEEMIX!!!!!!
Dare I say that we invented the remix?
[
#msg19246 date=1195152546][/size]Quote from: Forrest link=[color=pinktopic=1486.msg19145#msg19145 date=1195084193]Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other threadQuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.
Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]:PQuote from: Forrest link=topic=1486.msg19246c=1486.msg19019#msg19019 date=1194989599[quote author. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comm
Tom Waits
??? :DQuote[/s]
Robert Pollard needs an editor, To :-Xm Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!Quote[/right]
Tom Waits also needs some face cream. [/color] Spo :( ???t on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spo :( ???t on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet love :Dsjust needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662][/right]But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.273 date=1195157050]buffcoat link=topic=1486.msg19055#msg19055 date=1195004570]Quote from: Forrest link=topic=1486.msg19246c=1486.msg19019#msg19019 date=1194989599[quote author. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radioheadents elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.[/u]
I've listened to every Radiohead album [/glow] relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awffrom [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:
[quote authorTom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.QuoteQuoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted =dave from knoxville link=topic=1486.msg19060#msg19060 date=119501428[/pre]buffcoat link=topic=1486.msg19055#msg19055 date=1195004570]Quoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:[/u]omments ds an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.Quote from: dave 6QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.Tom Waits just neethey invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.Quote[/u]omments elude me.Quoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:Quote from: dave
link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662Quote[/u]
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead c1195014286]QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of mythat.
Totally!! them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell rele :-* :-* :o :o :-* :-*ased a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of
Indubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.Right?
(Wrong)
ul. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her.Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. ButTom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
[/quote]
Well said!Quoteparts
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, [/i] agree with others.I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.
Eh. Beauty is overrated.[/s]
I see your point, but I also see other points too.Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!
Ha! Silly me! Now I forgot to actually type it in! Ha ha ha! :D
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!
:'(
I'm missing the Guinness thing. Did they endorse some Met exhibit? Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?I call for a thread do-over.
Ian, it seems so... inadequate now. Doesn't it?
I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.
No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).
what's this thread about?
REEEEEEEEMIX!!!!!!
Dare I say that we invented the remix?8) :( :D :-\ :-\MUPPETS
[
#msg19246 date=1195152546][/size]Quote from: Forrest link=[color=pinktopic=1486.msg19145#msg19145 date=1195084193]Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other thread:PQuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)[move]
Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]Quote from: Forrest link=topic=1486.msg19246c=1486.msg19019#msg19019 date=1194989599[quote author. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.[move] :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comm
Tom Waits
??? :DQuote[/s]
Robert Pollard needs an editor, To :-Xm Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!Quote[/right]
Tom Waits also needs some face cream. [/color] Spo :( ???t on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spo :( ???t on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet love :Dsjust needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662][/right]But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.273 date=1195157050]buffcoat link=topic=1486.msg19055#msg19055 date=1195004570]Quote from: Forrest link=topic=1486.msg19246c=1486.msg19019#msg19019 date=1194989599[quote author. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radioheadents elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.[/u]I've listened to every Radiohead album [/glow] relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awffromabove that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:[/move]
[quote authorTom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.QuoteQuoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted =dave from knoxville link=topic=1486.msg19060#msg19060 date=119501428[/pre]buffcoat link=topic=1486.msg19055#msg19055 date=1195004570]Quoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:[/u]omments ds an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.Quote from: dave 6QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.Tom Waits just neethey invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.Quote[/u]omments elude me.Quoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:Quote from: dave
link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662Quote[/u]
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead c1195014286]QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of mythat.
Totally!! them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell rele :-* :-* :o :o :-* :-*ased a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version ofIndubitably!QuotePretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.QuoteO.k. - that one I actually don't get... but you get the picture!
Etc.Right?
(Wrong)
ul. Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :oAt least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her.Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. ButTom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
[/quote]
Well said!Quoteparts
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, [/i] agree with others.I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
It's kind of beautiful, in a way.>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(Eh. Beauty is overrated.[/s]
I see your point, but I also see other points too.Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!
Ha! Silly me! Now I forgot to actually type it in! Ha ha ha! :D
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!
:'(
I'm missing the Guinness thing. Did they endorse some Met exhibit? Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?I call for a thread do-over.
Ian, it seems so... inadequate now. Doesn't it?
I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.
No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).
what's this thread about?REEEEEEEEMIX!!!!!!
Dare I say that we invented the remix?8) :( :D :-\ :-\MUPPETS
[
#msg19246 date=1195152546][/size]Quote from: Forrest link=[color=pinktopic=1486.msg19145#msg19145 date=1195084193]Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other threadQuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)[move]
Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]Quote from: Forrest link=topic=1486.msg19246c=1486.msg19019#msg19019 date=1194989599[quote author. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.[move] :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comm
Tom Waits
??? :DQuote[/s]
Robert Pollard needs an editor, To :-Xm Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!Quote[/right]
Tom Waits also needs some face cream. [/color] Spo :( ???t on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spo :( ???t on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet love :Dsjust needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]273 date=1195157050]Quote from: Forrest link=topic=1486.msg19246c=1486.msg19019#msg19019 date=1194989599[quote author. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radioheadents elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.[/u]I've listened to every Radiohead album [/glow] relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awffromabove that you're directlyreferencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:[/move], who are the worst band ever.
[quote authorTom S. has said that he likes RadioheadExcept when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.[/quote]buffcoat link=topic=1486.msg19055#msg19055 date=1195004570]QuoteQuoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted =dave from knoxville link=topic=1486.msg19060#msg19060 date=119501428[/pre]buffcoat link=topic=1486.msg19055#msg19055 date=1195004570]Quoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:[/u]omments ds an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.Quote from: dave 6QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.Tom Waits just neethey invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.Quote[/u]omments elude me.Quoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:Quote from: dave
link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662Quote[/u]
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead c1195014286]QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of myRight?(Wrong)
ul.
assss!!!!!!!!:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :oAt least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her.Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. ButTom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
[/quote]
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCvXzjGRnKc[/youtube]Quoteparts
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.[/i]I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
[/quote]
[/quote]It's kind of beautiful, in a way.>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(Eh. Beauty is overrated.[/s]
[/quote]
::) :-[
I see your point, but I also see other points too.Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
[/quote]
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
[/quote]
[/quote] ??? ::) :P
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
[/quote]
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
8) ;D ;D ;) :-X :-* :'(
[/quote]
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
[/quote](http://www.overtimetours.com/img/porpoise.jpg)[/glow]
Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!
[/quote]
Ha! Silly me! Now I forgot to actually type it in! Ha ha ha! :D
I was gonna say thatGuiness or no Guiness, I'mjust happyto have been able to participate!
:'(
[/quote]
I'm missing Met ? Doendinness thingorsthnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnne Gusome they Matthew .pay for Did they exhibite Barney's expensive nonsense?I call for a thread do-over.
[/quote] :P
TAPDANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.
[/quote]
No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).
[/quote]what's this thread about?[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]REEEEEEEEMIX!!!!!![/quote]
Dare I say that we invented the remix?
[/quote]8) :( :D :-\ :-\MUPPETS[/quote]
[/quote]
i love how the smileys and "muppets" move faster than the "REEEEEEMIX!!!!"
[
#msg19246 date=1195152546][/size]Quote from: Forrest link=[color=pinktopic=1486.msg19145#msg19145 date=1195084193]Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other threadQuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)[move]
Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]Quote from: Forrest link=topic=1486.msg19246c=1486.msg19019#msg19019 date=1194989599[quote author. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.[move] :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comm
Tom Waits
??? :DQuote[/s]
Robert Pollard needs an editor, To :-Xm Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Well said!Quote[/right]
Tom Waits also needs some face cream. [/color] Spo :( ???t on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spo :( ???t on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet love :Dsjust needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]273 date=1195157050]Quote from: Forrest link=topic=1486.msg19246c=1486.msg19019#msg19019 date=1194989599[quote author. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radioheadents elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.[/u]I've listened to every Radiohead album [/glow] relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awffromabove that you're directlyreferencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:[/move], who are the worst band ever.
[quote authorTom S. has said that he likes RadioheadExcept when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.[/quote]buffcoat link=topic=1486.msg19055#msg19055 date=1195004570]QuoteQuoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted =dave from knoxville link=topic=1486.msg19060#msg19060 date=119501428[/pre]buffcoat link=topic=1486.msg19055#msg19055 date=1195004570]Quoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:[/u]omments ds an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the vas deferens. Stephin Merrittmus is the same way. But Rainy and the Ess-Dogs is one of my favorite Jicks songs.Quote from: dave 6QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.Tom Waits just invented electronic music the other day. He used a dishrag and a piece of gravel from his larynx. He polished those things. Put them to wax. It went platinum. He got a boner and put a cigarette out on it. Then Ralph Bakshi filmed it, roto-scoped it, sold it to 20th Century Samantha Fox. Them and Bjork.
Tom S. has said that he likes Matthew Barney and Bjork.Quote[/u]menthols elude me.Quoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:Quote from: dave
link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662Quote[/u]
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead c1195014286]QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of myRight?(Wrong)
ul.
assss!!!!!!!!:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :oAt least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her.Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. ButTom S. has said that he likes Radddiohead, who are the raddddest band ever. Except when they invented electrons. Them and Filthy Laurie.
[/quote]
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCvXzjGRnKc[/youtube]Quoteparts
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.[/i]I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
[/quote]
[/quote]It's kind of beautiful, in a way.>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(Eh. Beauty is overrated.[/s]
[/quote]
::) :-[
I see your point, but I also see other points too.Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'( ****-That's really funny. --J.Junk*****
[/quote]
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
[/quote]
[/quote] ??? ::) :P
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met. ****looks more like minimalism or op art to me. Agnes Marden perhaps.*****
[/quote]
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
8) ;D ;D ;) :-X :-* :'(
[/quote]
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
[/quote](http://www.overtimetours.com/img/porpoise.jpg)[/glow]
Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!
[/quote]
Ha! Silly me! Now I forgot to actually type it in! Ha ha ha! :D
I was gonna say thatGuiness or no Guiness, I'mjust happyto have been able to participate!
:'(
[/quote]
I'm missing Met ? Doendinness thingorsthnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnne Gusome they Matthew .pay for Did they expedite Barney's expensive nonsense?I call for a thread do-over.
[/quote] :P
TAPDANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.
[/quote]
No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).
[/quote]what's this thread about?[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]REEEEEEEEMIX!!!!!![/quote]
Dare I say that we invented the remix?
[/quote]8) :( :D :-\ :-\MUPPETS[/quote]
[/quote]
i love how the smileys and "muppets" move faster than the "REEEEEEMIX!!!!"
[/quote]
I was about to threaten to quit the board if I saw one more LOLCat, but now I've fallen in love all over again (and added crap to the remix)
[
#msg19246 date=1195152546][/size]Quote from: Forrest link=[color=pinktopic=1486.msg19145#msg19145 date=1195084193]Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other threadQuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.[move] ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)[move]
Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]Quote from: Forrest link=topic=1486.msg19246c=1486.msg19019#msg19019 date=1194989599[quote author. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.[move] :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Quote[/s]
Robert Pollard needs an editor, To :-Xm Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead comments elude me.
Quote[/right]
Tom Waits also needs some face cream. [/color] Spo :( ???t on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.
Spo :( ???t on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet love :Dsjust needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]273 date=1195157050]Quote from: Forrest link=topic=1486.msg19246c=1486.msg19019#msg19019 date=1194989599[quote author. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radioheadents elude me.
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.Spot on about Robert Pollard. I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them. Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal. Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album? Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.
Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.[/u]I've listened to every Radiohead album [/glow] relatively closely, including the new one. They're just awffromabove that you're directlyreferencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:[/move], who are the worst band ever.
[quote authorTom S. has said that he likes RadioheadExcept when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.[/quote]buffcoat link=topic=1486.msg19055#msg19055 date=1195004570]QuoteQuoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted =dave from knoxville link=topic=1486.msg19060#msg19060 date=119501428[/pre]buffcoat link=topic=1486.msg19055#msg19055 date=1195004570]Quoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:[/u]omments ds an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums.Quote from: dave 6QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.Tom Waits just neethey invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.Quote[/u]omments elude me.Quoteparts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section. Like this:Quote from: dave
link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662Quote[/u]
Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.
Your Radiohead c1195014286]QuoteI've tried to like Tom Waits before.Tom Waits just needs an editor. He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference. Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of myRight?(Wrong)
ul.
assss!!!!!!!!:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :oAt least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her.Radiohead just copies. No that there's anything wrong with copying. ButTom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever. Except when they invented electronic music. Them and Bjork.
[/quote]
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCvXzjGRnKc[/youtube]Quoteparts
Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.
I disagree with some points, agree with others.[/i]I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.
[/quote]
[/quote]It's kind of beautiful, in a way.>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(Eh. Beauty is overrated.[/s]
[/quote]
::) :-[
I see your point, but I also see other points too.Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together. :'(
[/quote]
But not too quickly. More like mid-speed.
[/quote]
[/quote] ??? ::) :P
The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.
[/quote]
All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?
8) ;D ;D ;) :-X :-* :'(
[/quote]
Yeah, I... wait... I forgot what i was gonna say...
[/quote](http://www.overtimetours.com/img/porpoise.jpg)[/glow]
Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!
[/quote]
Ha! Silly me! Now I forgot to actually type it in! Ha ha ha! :D
I was gonna say thatGuiness or no Guiness, I'mjust happyto have been able to participate!
:'(
[/quote]
I'm missing Met ? Doendinness thingorsthnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnne Gusome they Matthew .pay for Did they exhibite Barney's expensive nonsense?I call for a thread do-over.
[/quote] :P
TAPDANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.
[/quote]
No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).
[/quote]what's this thread about?[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]REEEEEEEEMIX!!!!!![/quote]
Dare I say that we invented the remix?
[/quote]8) :( :D :-\ :-\MUPPETS[/quote]
[/quote]
i love how the smileys and "muppets" move faster than the "REEEEEEMIX!!!!"[/move]
[/quote]
I think it's getting too self-conscious. Trying too hard now. Too bad.
AND HARRY SHEARER'S GRAMMY NOMINATED CD
Hey Tom, how about reviewing the new Mars Volta CD?
The Dirty Projectore "Rise Above"
They "cover" Damaged by Black Flag in its entirety.
How about that Vampire Weekend.You can do your own version of it. The entire thing is basically Graceland if it was written by Peter Bjorn & John with many many references to rich people things/problems.
How about that Vampire Weekend.