FOT Forum

FOT Community => General Discussion => Topic started by: cutout on June 15, 2008, 01:11:27 PM

Title: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: cutout on June 15, 2008, 01:11:27 PM
This made me laugh -

http://twitter.com/Richard_Dawkins/statuses/835354135

It's apparently really him. And his 'tweets' are as banal as anyone's.
Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: yesno on June 15, 2008, 01:15:06 PM
Ugh.  Awful.  Only funny people should use Twitter.  Notice that I'm not on it.
Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: Phantom Hugger on June 15, 2008, 04:47:49 PM
I have to admit, his dinner does sound lovely.
Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: AllisonLeGnome on June 15, 2008, 09:47:34 PM
Really? (http://twitter.com/Richard_Dawkins/statuses/833204946) NOW he has a platform for internet communication!
Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: buffcoat on June 16, 2008, 09:15:14 PM
I thought this was Richard Dawson.
Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: erechoveraker on June 16, 2008, 11:35:26 PM
Me too.  >:(
Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: cutout on June 17, 2008, 09:48:34 AM
Oy. Judging from his recent contributions, I'm not sure if Twitter's his best medium.

http://twitter.com/Richard_Dawkins/
Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: yesno on June 17, 2008, 09:54:16 AM
It looks like someone stole his password.  (Seriously, the posts are by someone criticizing "RD".)
Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: cutout on June 17, 2008, 10:22:59 AM
http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/06/13/you-knew-this-was-coming-2/#comment-186638
Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: yesno on June 17, 2008, 11:48:26 AM
I guess the idea was to rope people in by posting dull stuff, and then turn it into a soapbox.

Why do people insist that you have to respect goofy "beliefs?"  You have to respect people, including people that belief goofy things.  You don't have to respect the belief itself.  What does that even mean?  If you're a Christian, for instance, how could you possibly "respect" a belief (in, say, reincarnation) that you are 100% certain is wrong?  Being polite and civilized is how you respect people.

(not that you should listen to me about being respectful)
Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: cutout on June 17, 2008, 04:44:53 PM
Quote
If you're a Christian, for instance, how could you possibly "respect" a belief (in, say, reincarnation) that you are 100% certain is wrong?

Likewise, it's tricky to respect a bearded, wish-granting, cloud-dwelling ghost if you don't believe in him.
Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: Oogie on June 19, 2008, 08:21:07 PM
Quote
If you're a Christian, for instance, how could you possibly "respect" a belief (in, say, reincarnation) that you are 100% certain is wrong?

Likewise, it's tricky to respect a bearded, wish-granting, cloud-dwelling ghost if you don't believe in him.

Quotes like that is why atheists get the "asshole" metatag.
Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: cutout on June 19, 2008, 10:51:54 PM
Good to know.

<meta name="asshole" content="One who does not believe in ghosts or superstitions."> (http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=2167931)
Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: Satchmo Mask on June 19, 2008, 11:44:26 PM
Quote
If you're a Christian, for instance, how could you possibly "respect" a belief (in, say, reincarnation) that you are 100% certain is wrong?

Likewise, it's tricky to respect a bearded, wish-granting, cloud-dwelling ghost if you don't believe in him.

You asshole! If you don't believe in Him! Him!!!
Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: Oogie on June 23, 2008, 01:03:53 PM
Quote
If you're a Christian, for instance, how could you possibly "respect" a belief (in, say, reincarnation) that you are 100% certain is wrong?

Likewise, it's tricky to respect a bearded, wish-granting, cloud-dwelling ghost if you don't believe in him.

You asshole! If you don't believe in Him! Him!!!

It's not the not-believing, it's the smug, self-righteous condescension.

Iffins I meets me an atheist who isn't smug, self-righteous, and condescending, I will eat my shoe, in honor of smug, self-righteous, and condescending atheist Errol Morris and his nemesis Warner Hurtsodd.


Title: Re: Richard Dawkins on Twitter
Post by: Sarah on June 23, 2008, 01:51:14 PM
For me, anyone who is absolutely certain about any of this stuff is misguided.  The only thing I have faith in is the impossibility of knowing for sure what's what.