FOT Forum

The Best Show on WFMU => Show Discussion => Topic started by: Keith Whitener on June 25, 2009, 12:43:06 PM

Title: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: Keith Whitener on June 25, 2009, 12:43:06 PM
Check this out: http://www.buzzine.com/2009/06/tom-scharpling-interview/
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: Geoff Johnston on June 25, 2009, 03:37:40 PM
Nice work, Ben!
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: yesno on June 25, 2009, 04:38:50 PM
I agree 100% with Tom's theory of the suburbs.
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: pete on June 25, 2009, 04:43:34 PM
This is a great quote :
Quote
But there’s this thing in the suburbs that’s really funny in its own way, but we also do it without taking the approach of someone blowing the lid off the suburbs like, “It’s dark, it’s weird in the suburbs, and people don’t know it.” Everybody knows it.
 

The "check this shit out, I'm totally showing the DARK SIDE OF SUBURBIA, prepare to get your minds blown out" as a filmmaker's trope is one of the most boring, overdone things ever.  I mean, there are plenty of fine stories to be told in suburbia, including dark ones, sure, but that can't be like... your "thing".
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: JonFromMaplewood on June 25, 2009, 04:56:42 PM
This is a great quote :
Quote
But there’s this thing in the suburbs that’s really funny in its own way, but we also do it without taking the approach of someone blowing the lid off the suburbs like, “It’s dark, it’s weird in the suburbs, and people don’t know it.” Everybody knows it.
 

The "check this shit out, I'm totally showing the DARK SIDE OF SUBURBIA, prepare to get your minds blown out" as a filmmaker's trope is one of the most boring, overdone things ever.  I mean, there are plenty of fine stories to be told in suburbia, including dark ones, sure, but that can't be like... your "thing".

I called the show a few years back about this. I complained that I was the only person I knew who did not like "American Beauty" for these exact reasons. I found no revelation in it whatsoever.  Thankfully, Tom agreed, and then he went off on Todd Solondz (sp?).  Blue Velvet may be the only "suburbia is weird" film I like because it is so weird itself, one cannot take it as "looking down" at the suburbs in any way.  More like David Lynch saying "Hey there suburbs! You're as weird as me! Let's smoke a cigarette together!"
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: yesno on June 25, 2009, 05:05:00 PM
I've got no time for the "The suburbs are dark and weird" lidblower junk, but I do think that kids from the suburbs, at least boring ones like the one I grew up in (Brick, NJ) have to learn how to make their own fun.  But, I bet kids growing up in Tokyo also find everything boring.
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: Shaggy 2 Grote on June 25, 2009, 10:31:38 PM
Nice piece, Ben (and Tom)!

An OT sidebar about that blowing-the-lid-off-the-suburbs thing: I wrote a domestic family comedy because I hate that sort of play and I wanted to try and find a way to make it interesting, and a regional theater marketed it as a blowing-the-lid-off-the-American-family sort of thing, which wasn't my intention at all.  I was just trying to keep myself interested.  Then both the Washington Post and the A/V Club gave me shit about it.  That sucked.

OK, everyone get back to complimenting Ben now.
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: hugman on June 26, 2009, 04:36:16 AM
Nice piece, Ben (and Tom)!

An OT sidebar about that blowing-the-lid-off-the-suburbs thing: I wrote a domestic family comedy because I hate that sort of play and I wanted to try and find a way to make it interesting, and a regional theater marketed it as a blowing-the-lid-off-the-American-family sort of thing, which wasn't my intention at all.  I was just trying to keep myself interested.  Then both the Washington Post and the A/V Club gave me shit about it.  That sucked.

OK, everyone get back to complimenting Ben now.

it's a complex issue. i don't think the suburbs are dark and scary. they are a cultural vacuum in which it's painful to grow up if you are artistically or philosophically inclined. also the location of the suburb matters.  a suburb of, say, philadelphia, where you have easy and quick access to new york city is a universe away from a suburb of st. louis or cleveland.
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: hugman on June 26, 2009, 04:48:39 AM
and also, great interview, ben.  nice to read an interview with Tom that doesn't just rehash the same information we've read or heard before.
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: James W on June 26, 2009, 05:11:38 AM
The show never stops! That was great, B & T.
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: SJK on June 26, 2009, 06:28:13 AM
Top notch.
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: todd on June 26, 2009, 09:14:56 AM
suburb of st. louis

I can confirm that these suck!
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: Julie on June 26, 2009, 10:31:28 AM
And the suburbs of Cincinnati suck. And the suburbs of Detroit suck.
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: buffcoat on June 26, 2009, 11:25:42 AM
What doesn't suck?


Cities and suburbs and rural areas suck for different reasons, but the root cause is the same.  They are designed by and filled with human beings.

I hear the South Pacific is nice.  Or was nice, until people realized it and started living there.



Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: Keith Whitener on June 26, 2009, 01:24:12 PM
Nice work, Ben!

Nice piece, Ben (and Tom)!


and also, great interview, ben. 

I just ask questions. All the credit really belongs to Tom!
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: Regular Joe on June 26, 2009, 02:23:46 PM
That was a tremendous interview Ben! You really got into the comedy mind of Scharpling, a wonderful thing to behold.

PS to Spike: I think you just got served! As I see it, you now have no choice but to show up and put your money where your mouth is.

Quote
BK: I wonder about Spike because he seems like he’s got a normal job, but he’s also a male dominatrix…?

TS: I guess. Here’s what I think: that’s in his head a little bit. I would be shocked if this guy was really living out those fantasies. I think he has just created this persona, this idealized version of himself. I could be completely off base, of course, and I like him a lot, but he’s clearly being a character and he’s having a lot of fun. He wouldn’t call back if it was any other way.
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: masterofsparks on June 26, 2009, 05:02:38 PM
And the suburbs of Cincinnati suck.

How dare you.
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: hugman on June 26, 2009, 06:13:07 PM
And the suburbs of Cincinnati suck.

How dare you.

love the dock ellis pic, MOS!
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: NJL on June 27, 2009, 04:41:04 PM
I really like Neil Numberman's poster.  Is that available on the web?
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: chrisfoll577 on June 27, 2009, 04:51:26 PM
I really like Neil Numberman's poster.  Is that available on the web?

I don't think so.  It was part of Tom's 2008 Marathon Premium.
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: timmx on June 30, 2009, 04:43:08 PM
Tom's discussion of the police blotter reminded me of this recent, great police blotter item from my suburb:

"Oak Lawn crime: Burrito thrown"
Title: Re: A Q and A with Tom
Post by: LaunchCode on July 06, 2009, 12:47:54 AM
the thing i got out of it is what for me makes the show so great-- tom doesn't make it mean for mean's sake OR nice for nice's sake.  it would be so easy for him to tip over into either but he keeps his cool and his balance-- really amazing

and i totally agree about the attention span factor... when i first listened to the best show, it was so different, so long-form that it hooked me at once.

may the best show era be long and fruitful!!!

and yes, good job ben k!