FOT Forum

FOT Community => General Discussion => Topic started by: redmedicine on May 21, 2010, 01:05:23 PM

Title: World Cup
Post by: redmedicine on May 21, 2010, 01:05:23 PM
It's probably time to split off from the EPL thread.  It seems that the stateside media is finally giving the WC respect, I don't remember even in 06 this much attention being given with three weeks left to go.

Either that, or Deuce's mad skills are finally getting the attention they deserve.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hp52oY25FW4[/youtube]
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: cutout on May 22, 2010, 01:56:08 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idLG6jh23yE


I'm headed over on Jun26 and staying with a friend in Jo-burg to see 4 games there and in Pretoria. Haven't been this excited about something in a long time.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on May 22, 2010, 02:10:25 PM
That's really cool, cutout - friends and I were considering it, but then Sweden didn't qualify, and... you know.

Don't get murdered!
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: cutout on May 22, 2010, 02:39:05 PM
Yea... I've been to Cape Town before and only sensed danger once or twice, otherwise it was like a more exotic version of San Fransisco. The friend I stayed with there said he'd migrated from Johannesburg because he'd been mugged not once but twice with a machete.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on May 22, 2010, 03:58:44 PM
I'll set up a Fantasy League for the FOT, as promised, sometime in the next week.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: redmedicine on May 22, 2010, 05:15:32 PM
I'll set up a Fantasy League for the FOT, as promised, sometime in the next week.

Thanks, Samir!

If today's UEFA match is any indication, Julio Cesar may be the goalkeeper to beat in South Africa.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on June 01, 2010, 08:08:53 PM
Yo,

PM me your email addresses if you want in the Fontasy League. I don't think you can actually pick your teams until the 4th, which is the deadline for countries to submit their final 23.
Theo, we hardly knew ye.

Let's DO this.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Big Plastic Head on June 02, 2010, 06:13:54 PM
DOI'N IT! Thanks for setting it up, Samir.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: senorcorazon on June 02, 2010, 10:20:08 PM
I want in on the league, but only in the understanding that I don't know anything about soccer. Or handball or whatever you call it.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: cutout on June 02, 2010, 11:40:31 PM
Discovered this by accident, but I always knew I didn't trust Chuck Klosterman (http://tinyurl.com/28ff3ol) -

Quote
Soccer fanatics love to tell you that soccer is the most popular game on earth and that it's played by 500 million people every day, as if that somehow proves its value. Actually, the opposite is true. Why should I care that every single citizen of Chile and Iran and Gibraltar thoughtlessly adores "football"? Do the people making this argument also assume Coca-Cola is ambrosia? Real sports aren't for everyone. And don't accuse me of being the Ugly American for degrading soccer. That has nothing to do with it. It's not xenophobic to hate soccer; it's socially reprehensible to support it. To say you love soccer is to say you believe in enforced equality more than you believe in the value of competition and the capacity of the human spirit. It should surprise no one that Benito Mussolini loved being photographed with Italian soccer stars during the 1930s; they were undoubtedly kindred spirits. I would sooner have my kid deal crystal meth than play soccer. Every time I pull up behind a Ford Aerostar with a "#1 Soccer Mom" bumper sticker, I feel like I'm marching in the wake of the Khmer Rouge.

Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 03, 2010, 05:07:05 AM
Fuck that guy.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Christina on June 03, 2010, 07:43:53 AM
That paragraph has no proof in it. It's just "everyone in the world loves soccer except the US, so I say they're a bunch of nazis". He knows that soccer isn't played with severed human heads, right?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: senorcorazon on June 03, 2010, 08:25:35 AM
Yes, no other world leader has had pictures taken with sports figures. Ahem.

(http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/82920876.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA54892E6B6332531AC5C75A1F3F6F42AF936AB709D5F2BE59308E30A760B0D811297)

I understand that this guys hates the lack of competition in youth soccer (a stupid argument to make because that's the point, duh, teamwork and sportsmanship) but to say that professional soccer is "enforced equality" is just plain dumb. I comprehend about 3% of soccer but even I can tell when a team is getting smacked around.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: senorcorazon on June 03, 2010, 08:27:08 AM
Also, not every citizen in Chile cares about soccer. Many of them don't give a shit at all. In two trips there I've heard absolutely zero conversations about soccer.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on June 03, 2010, 08:32:01 AM
Fuck that guy.

This is accurate.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: redmedicine on June 03, 2010, 12:34:01 PM
I came across this yesterday, I can't decide if it's really impressive or rather ridiculous ...

http://www.marca.com/deporte/futbol/mundial/sudafrica-2010/calendario-english.html (http://www.marca.com/deporte/futbol/mundial/sudafrica-2010/calendario-english.html)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: senorcorazon on June 03, 2010, 03:47:58 PM
I VOTE FOR AWESOME!
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: redmedicine on June 03, 2010, 08:02:45 PM
Apparently someone else thought of it first.  The proof is in the pudding, and the pudding in this case ... is a football.

[youtube]DsQpWBSjVzI[/youtube]
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 04, 2010, 10:39:32 AM
Rio - OUT!
Drogba - OUT!

With only a week to go. Dramatic. Especially tough for the Ivory Coast.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on June 04, 2010, 01:08:03 PM
Too late for Sol Campbell now!

Think they'll revert to JT for England captain? Would defeat the whole purpose of demoting him. If not him, who? Lamps? Gerrard?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 04, 2010, 01:21:53 PM
Lamps or Gerrard for sure.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 04, 2010, 03:10:47 PM
The Onion reports: Nation's Soccer Fan Becoming Insufferable (http://www.theonion.com/articles/nations-soccer-fan-becoming-insufferable,17553/)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Big Plastic Head on June 04, 2010, 06:47:44 PM
I have never played any sort of fontasy sports game before. What, never? No, never! I have NO idea what I am doing. FUN!

We are playing for cash, right?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: not that clay on June 04, 2010, 10:21:43 PM
I have never played any sort of fontasy sports game before. What, never? No, never! I have NO idea what I am doing. FUN!

We are playing for cash, right?

Yeah, and you're already down $200!
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: cutout on June 04, 2010, 10:57:18 PM
Drogba also likely out. Wow.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: senorcorazon on June 04, 2010, 11:56:52 PM
How many times am I allowed to laugh at the name Kaka before it becomes insulting and childish? Can I get 2?

The Chileans are making their once-a-decade appearance at the World Cup, so get ready to wonder, according to Yahoo, "Who is going to partner Humberto Suazo up front?" I KNOW YOU ARE ALL WONDERING THAT.

Kaka. **snicker.**
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 05, 2010, 08:02:11 AM
Drogba also likely out. Wow.

As we learned upthread!
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 05, 2010, 12:53:48 PM
Robben - OUT? (http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/jun/05/arjen-robben-holland-world-cup-2010)

Lots of late casualties.

Watched South Africa beat Denmark today. Denmark looked weak. And the vuvuzelas were just as annoying as ever.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 05, 2010, 02:12:56 PM
Mikel - OUT! (http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/jun/05/world-cup-mikel-john-obi)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: redmedicine on June 06, 2010, 04:57:19 PM
One positive that can come out of all of these injuries is that there will be more chances for lesser known players to step up and prove themselves.  I look forward to stories like Roger Milla in '90, and maybe that will happen this time.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: dave from knoxville on June 06, 2010, 06:09:01 PM
I just hope Beckham and Pele have good Cups. And Uri Gellar. He's a soccer player, right?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: redmedicine on June 06, 2010, 10:55:24 PM
I thought he was Elvis' hairdresser/guru.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: fonpr on June 06, 2010, 11:03:52 PM
Something tells me Spoony does not care for Uri Gellar.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpB4Ar93xwU&feature=related
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on June 07, 2010, 08:53:11 AM
We've got ten people in the league so far - all dudes, I'm fairly sure!

There's plenty of time if you still want to to join: the first deadline is Friday morning.

Just send me a direct message with your email address and I'll get an invite to you.

Play! It'll be fun!
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Big Plastic Head on June 07, 2010, 11:53:44 AM
I have never played any sort of fontasy sports game before. What, never? No, never! I have NO idea what I am doing. FUN!

We are playing for cash, right?

Yeah, and you're already down $200!

DAMNIT!! It's probably $400 now.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: chuck from cedar rapids on June 07, 2010, 12:37:44 PM
A friend I grew up with was just interviewed on NPR after analyzing Goldman Sachs 2010 World Cup Research Report. It's available for download (see my second link) and it sounds like an interesting read.

The NPR interview is here: http://www.npr.org/templates/player/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=127514062&m=127517883 (http://www.npr.org/templates/player/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=127514062&m=127517883)

And his original Foreign Policy blog post is here: http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/05/28/goldman_sachs_scores_with_2010_world_cup_research_report (http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/05/28/goldman_sachs_scores_with_2010_world_cup_research_report)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: slownerve on June 07, 2010, 03:35:42 PM
I would like to declare an interest in this thread.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on June 07, 2010, 05:57:15 PM
"Crouchy's eating his nachos"

(http://i30.tinypic.com/2z7pz85.jpg)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: redmedicine on June 07, 2010, 11:53:53 PM
Well, that's something I'll never be able to un-see.

This too ...

[youtube]sxdkyk8-Jm4[/youtube]
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: not that clay on June 08, 2010, 12:12:52 AM
Well, that's something I'll never be able to un-see.

This too ...

[youtube]sxdkyk8-Jm4[/youtube]


Why is Scott Adsit in goal, and why is he wearing a wig?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: not that clay on June 08, 2010, 12:28:11 AM
OK you Michael Sheen obsessives, here you go (start at 1:20)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eh3mr8Ez4tg&feature=player_embedded#t=1m20s
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on June 08, 2010, 09:19:04 AM
Nani - OUT! (http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/jun/08/nani-out-world-cup-2010)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: gravy boat on June 08, 2010, 09:58:40 AM
Let's start the predictions:

Winner: Netherlands

Most goals-Golden Boot - Van Persie (Netherlands)

Flameout: Portugal - I say they don't advance to 2d round

Dark Horse: Mexico (final 4)

Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 08, 2010, 10:30:33 AM
Nani - OUT! (http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/jun/08/nani-out-world-cup-2010)

As a non-supporter of Man U and Portugal, I'm not sorry. As a human being, I'm sorry. It must feel terrible getting sidelined this close to the Cup.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 08, 2010, 10:32:13 AM
Let's start the predictions:

Winner: Netherlands

Most goals-Golden Boot - Van Persie (Netherlands)


I'm gonna submit my predictions before Friday, but I will say that it would be awesome if Holland did well this year. I'm rooting for them (after France, who probably won't do well at all but you never know; and Spain).
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Big Plastic Head on June 08, 2010, 11:40:26 AM
Let's start the predictions:

Winner: Netherlands

Most goals-Golden Boot - Van Persie (Netherlands)

Flameout: Portugal - I say they don't advance to 2d round

Dark Horse: Mexico (final 4)


I like and support all those choices. Netherlands looked strong in the Mexico friendly last month. I like Mexico, too. Not great finishers but I like 'em.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: cutout on June 08, 2010, 11:46:54 AM
I'd be very happy to see either Spain or Holland win it. Lots of very likable players, exciting styles/chemistry. I really like Ivory Coast and Cameroon, but wouldn't predict they'd make it past the second round. Overall, I would just be happy not to see any of the Brazil/Italy/Germany monolith in the final 4 :P
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Big Plastic Head on June 08, 2010, 11:48:41 AM
I'd be very happy to see either Spain or Holland win it. Lots of very likable players, exciting styles/chemistry. I really like Ivory Coast and Cameroon, but wouldn't predict they'd make it past the second round. Overall, I would just be happy not to see any of the Brazil/Italy/Germany monolith in the final 4 :P

My wife was in the Peace Corps in Cameroon so I hope they do well. We will be rooting for them.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: slownerve on June 08, 2010, 12:14:22 PM
Winner: England (seriously!)

Golden Boot - Di Natale or Crouch (maybe a tie?)

Flameout: France - No wins, no goals, 2 red cards.

Dark Horse: Ghana
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: fonpr on June 08, 2010, 02:42:05 PM
Netherlands looked strong in the Mexico friendly last month.

I first read that as "Neanderthals looked strong".


I thought, "No kidding."

Then I thought, "Maybe I should pay attention to soccer".  But, I was wrong.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: senorcorazon on June 08, 2010, 10:29:18 PM
My brother correctly predicted the Buster Douglas-Mike Tyson fight, so maybe my family has the goods with lucky, ignorant calls on sports:

Winner: Spain
Golden Boot: I don't know what this is exactly, but I guess it's most goals. Villa? 
Flameout: Besides the USA? Zing? Argentina. Or, if the next line is to be believed, BRAZIL. BOOM.
Dark Horse: Chile. I'm biased, though. Totally ridiculous.

I'm probably unintentionally insulting a lot of people. Sorry.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Spoony on June 09, 2010, 02:22:26 PM
Something tells me Spoony does not care for Uri Gellar.

Let's see him do that with his mind, then I'll feel threatened.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: dave from knoxville on June 09, 2010, 09:40:22 PM
Something tells me Spoony does not care for Uri Gellar.

Let's see him do that with his mind, then I'll feel threatened.

Spoony's already bent.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: not that clay on June 09, 2010, 09:42:35 PM
I'm confused. You get to pick 20-odd players, and then you have to pick a starting 11. Do the other guys not count? Why bother picking so many people if only 11 count?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: cutout on June 09, 2010, 09:44:10 PM
There still needs to be healthy reserves for substitutions, injuries, etc
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: not that clay on June 09, 2010, 09:48:30 PM
There still needs to be healthy reserves for substitutions, injuries, etc

Yeah, half my favorite players have hamstring injuries.  Sheesh.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on June 09, 2010, 09:58:15 PM
I'm confused. You get to pick 20-odd players, and then you have to pick a starting 11. Do the other guys not count? Why bother picking so many people if only 11 count?

After each round, you can shuffle around your 11 - for instance, you might think that Portugal will struggle against Ivory Coast in their first match, in which case you may think twice about playing Portuguese attackers, on the theory that they're going to find it hard to score. But then, in their next match they're against North Korea, who by all right they should batter, so bring out your Portuguese attackers then. Rotation!
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: not that clay on June 09, 2010, 11:17:47 PM
I'm confused. You get to pick 20-odd players, and then you have to pick a starting 11. Do the other guys not count? Why bother picking so many people if only 11 count?

After each round, you can shuffle around your 11 - for instance, you might think that Portugal will struggle against Ivory Coast in their first match, in which case you may think twice about playing Portuguese attackers, on the theory that they're going to find it hard to score. But then, in their next match they're against North Korea, who by all right they should batter, so bring out your Portuguese attackers then. Rotation!

Thanks. I think I got my line up all straight now. It's a pain only allowing two players per country max.

Does the group stage count as one round, or is it each game during the group stage.  So much to know.

Is Tom in on this? He seemed interested on the radio.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Big Plastic Head on June 10, 2010, 01:49:44 PM
I'm confused. You get to pick 20-odd players, and then you have to pick a starting 11. Do the other guys not count? Why bother picking so many people if only 11 count?

After each round, you can shuffle around your 11 - for instance, you might think that Portugal will struggle against Ivory Coast in their first match, in which case you may think twice about playing Portuguese attackers, on the theory that they're going to find it hard to score. But then, in their next match they're against North Korea, who by all right they should batter, so bring out your Portuguese attackers then. Rotation!

Thanks. I think I got my line up all straight now. It's a pain only allowing two players per country max.

Does the group stage count as one round, or is it each game during the group stage.  So much to know.

Is Tom in on this? He seemed interested on the radio.

There is a "Scharpling" in the group now. He is probably at Kinkos going over the Soccer Prospectus picking his team right now.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: not that clay on June 10, 2010, 02:15:07 PM
I'm confused. You get to pick 20-odd players, and then you have to pick a starting 11. Do the other guys not count? Why bother picking so many people if only 11 count?

After each round, you can shuffle around your 11 - for instance, you might think that Portugal will struggle against Ivory Coast in their first match, in which case you may think twice about playing Portuguese attackers, on the theory that they're going to find it hard to score. But then, in their next match they're against North Korea, who by all right they should batter, so bring out your Portuguese attackers then. Rotation!

Thanks. I think I got my line up all straight now. It's a pain only allowing two players per country max.

Does the group stage count as one round, or is it each game during the group stage.  So much to know.

Is Tom in on this? He seemed interested on the radio.

There is a "Scharpling" in the group now. He is probably at Kinkos going over the Soccer Prospectus picking his team right now.

Cool. There are some great team names: PDX Street Trash   , The Couch Burners, and PINK CUPCAKES fc are my favorites.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Spoony on June 10, 2010, 02:23:20 PM
Spoony's already bent.

That sounds like Spoon-talk. AND YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENS TO SPOONS.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on June 10, 2010, 02:44:50 PM
There's still a few hours if anyone else wants to join the league. (Ladies? Any of you?). Please send me your email address if you want in.

I have seen a spike (yikes) in people wanting to take part today, I wonder if this has anything to do with El Goodo joining the fold.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 10, 2010, 03:51:07 PM
I have until kickoff tomorrow, right??!

Someone dared me to enter. I'm considering it.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 10, 2010, 04:57:08 PM
How the eff do I find our league?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: moonshake on June 10, 2010, 09:32:46 PM
I'm a TV-less slob. ESPN3.com will stream all games live but my ISP is not "participating".

Has anyone here used a reliable UK proxy or VPN service to access the BBC/ITV player? Or do you know of any other way to watch the WC online? I know some of the free ad-supported sites and softwares but I'm looking for something with better quality and reliability. I'll happily pay a few bucks for a decent service.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: senorcorazon on June 10, 2010, 09:46:27 PM
I've posted the code to the other game (pick the winners) in the forum, but there's only 12 hours left. So maybe I will compete against my self.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on June 10, 2010, 09:51:21 PM
I'm a TV-less slob. ESPN3.com will stream all games live but my ISP is not "participating".

Has anyone here used a reliable UK proxy or VPN service to access the BBC/ITV player? Or do you know of any other way to watch the WC online? I know some of the free ad-supported sites and softwares but I'm looking for something with better quality and reliability. I'll happily pay a few bucks for a decent service.

Give this a read: http://lifehacker.com/5559652/where-to-watch-world-cup-soccer-streaming-live
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: moonshake on June 10, 2010, 10:17:49 PM
I'm a TV-less slob. ESPN3.com will stream all games live but my ISP is not "participating".

Has anyone here used a reliable UK proxy or VPN service to access the BBC/ITV player? Or do you know of any other way to watch the WC online? I know some of the free ad-supported sites and softwares but I'm looking for something with better quality and reliability. I'll happily pay a few bucks for a decent service.

Give this a read: http://lifehacker.com/5559652/where-to-watch-world-cup-soccer-streaming-live

Thanks for the link, Samir. I already knew of most of those sites. Most of them are geo-restricted and the ones that aren't, are ad-ridden and unreliable. I was only wondering if any FOTs have had experience with any good paid proxy/vpn services. If not, I guess any of those shady live tv streaming sites will do. A new site I've recently discovered (veetle.com) might be the best option that I have so far.

Go USA!
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Gilly on June 10, 2010, 11:25:30 PM
I don't get how this works with the league and I want to beat the hardcore soccer fans here once again... what's the point of the bench? Do I ever have to use those players?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: johnintheuk on June 11, 2010, 08:58:41 AM
Less than an hour to go to get your team sorted, be quick if you want to make any last minute changes/additions.

I don't get how this works with the league and I want to beat the hardcore soccer fans here once again... what's the point of the bench? Do I ever have to use those players?
The players can be switched to let you pick players who are up against weaker teams and therefore more likely to do well.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: senorcorazon on June 11, 2010, 09:21:46 AM
Also, the team becomes your core for the rest of the World Cup. You can transfer people on/off your roster but it's limited (after a certain number they start taking points away from you).
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: AaronC on June 11, 2010, 10:07:07 AM
I'm playing the fantasy game under the team name "I'd Don't Give A Rip."  I love the World Cup, but I have no idea who any of the players are.  Pure luck is my strategy. 
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: johnintheuk on June 11, 2010, 11:06:06 AM
I'm playing the fantasy game under the team name "I'd Don't Give A Rip."  I love the World Cup, but I have no idea who any of the players are.  Pure luck is my strategy. 

I'm "The Chip Butties". My strategy (for the main 11) was to pick a goalkeeper and defenders from teams in groups which I don't think will have many goals (except Glen Johnson who was picked for being a potential goal scoring defender) and midfielders & strikers in teams I think could score a fair few. No idea if that's how the fantasy points are awarded though, I probably should have read the rules.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: cutout on June 11, 2010, 01:15:56 PM
I was kind of heartbroken to see Mexico equalize even though it was inevitable. A decisive home victory in the first game would have set an awesome tone.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: not that clay on June 11, 2010, 03:04:35 PM
This is so frustrating! I had Henry starting today and he wasn't even in the game.  Bah.

Also, the ESPN needs to filter out the vuvuzela. I can't take it.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: JonFromMaplewood on June 11, 2010, 03:33:55 PM
(http://viviennemackie.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/vuvuzela2.jpg)

This is going to drive me to madness punctuated by seizures.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 11, 2010, 03:47:54 PM
My friend is apparently working on some way to get rid of the vuvuzela noise by some weird EQ setup.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: cutout on June 11, 2010, 04:18:46 PM
I like how Henry of all people just got mad about an alleged handball.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 11, 2010, 07:27:02 PM
Question: so, I can't just make substitutions to my starting 11 without being deducted points? I had a couple of players taking the field today, which led to some points. But tomorrow, none of them are obviously playing. But when I tried to sub them with players from my bench (no transfers, mind you), the game told me that would cost xx points. But if I'm not allowed to sub people I won't make any points tomorrow! What gives? Or should I consider the points earned today a way to actually make subs, which perhaps not all teams can do at this point?

I don't think I fully understand the rules of this game.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 11, 2010, 07:33:45 PM
I now understand the rules a little better.

From the rules section:

Quote

Things to note about substitutions

    * If you remove a player who has scored points for your team, these points will be lost. The player cannot be brought back into your team until the next round.


Which was exactly what I was trying to do.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on June 11, 2010, 07:35:15 PM
Shoulda gone with the Guardian one, shouldn't I? Much easier to understand.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 11, 2010, 07:37:28 PM
I really like the layout of this one though. And it's the official one!
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: not that clay on June 11, 2010, 09:07:27 PM
I like how Henry of all people just got mad about an alleged handball.

No kidding. I don't even like Henry, I don't know why I picked him.  I should have stuck with Crouch.

(http://7amkickoff.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/peter-crouch.jpg)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Gilly on June 11, 2010, 09:55:17 PM
I went with the strategy of picking the best players and put scrubs on the bench.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on June 12, 2010, 12:30:14 AM
Since not that clay mentioned Peter Crouch, I now have to say it again. Crouchy's got his nachos.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mzb5ZlTh2w
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: slownerve on June 12, 2010, 04:15:41 AM
I like how Henry of all people just got mad about an alleged handball.

It was a very sheepish appeal though I think... Thierry was aware of the irony. He looked philosophical about it.

Let's hope Crouchy has some nachos on hand this evening!

And, let's hope the vuvuzela drown out the four bars of 'The Self Preservation Society' that the (very) unofficial England brass band plod through during every single England game ever.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: senorcorazon on June 12, 2010, 08:07:23 AM
I now understand the rules a little better.

From the rules section:

Quote

Things to note about substitutions

    * If you remove a player who has scored points for your team, these points will be lost. The player cannot be brought back into your team until the next round.


Which was exactly what I was trying to do.


I figured as much after you went on such a massive scoring binge. I wish the World Cup was like March Madness, where there are days with about 845 games on at once.

Let's admit it, we're all a part of it because of our love for McDonald's and Castrol.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: redmedicine on June 12, 2010, 05:19:19 PM
Since not that clay mentioned Peter Crouch, I now have to say it again. Crouchy's got his nachos.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mzb5ZlTh2w

One of the gang I was watching the game with compared him to a dessicated Roger Daltrey.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: johnintheuk on June 12, 2010, 05:24:37 PM
I now understand the rules a little better.

From the rules section:

Quote

Things to note about substitutions

    * If you remove a player who has scored points for your team, these points will be lost. The player cannot be brought back into your team until the next round.


Which was exactly what I was trying to do.

Thanks for clearing that up, I was just getting ready to make a bunch of substitutions. I guess it's a case of only subbing players who got no/low points and hoping the subs do better.

I also discovered today that the player designated as captain gets his points doubled. I'm guessing you can't change your captain mid-round though.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Sarah on June 12, 2010, 05:25:23 PM
So who won?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: moonshake on June 12, 2010, 07:30:33 PM
(http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/1139/tumblrl3x34btiyx1qz6l95.jpg)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: not that clay on June 12, 2010, 09:14:25 PM
So who won?

Brimstead United #2!!! Woohoo!
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 13, 2010, 05:02:14 PM
My friend Totto's solution to the vuvuzela menace. Most homeviewers won't have the sound equipment needed, but it should really be a piece of cake for the broadcasters to do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IciYpkNyJg
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Matthew_S on June 14, 2010, 03:26:41 PM
A small point, but one thing I am enjoying about watching the games is how critical the commentators are of the players, the coachs, the play in general.

"That was a terrible cross."

"I have no idea what his plan was with that pass."

"Coach X's decision to play Player y made little sense and finally, a substitution is called."


You just don't hear this type of statement in baseball, hockey, etc...

Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: johnintheuk on June 15, 2010, 03:27:14 PM
Just a note for the fantasy World Cup players, there's a second round game tomorrow as well as the final two first round games. Don't forget to set your round 2 starting 11 (and make your free transfer if you want to do so) http://en.mcdonalds.fantasy.fifa.com/M/myteam.mc?event=2
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 16, 2010, 12:44:55 PM
So of course my last (of round 1) desperate attempt to advance in the FOTFF ranks backfired horribly today. I went all out on Spain v Switzerland. My two most expensive players on the pitch - David Villa and Iker Casillas. Casillas as captain too. Surely the most impressive team of the last couple of years, the reigning European champions, who'd pretty much not lost a match in three-four years, would make mincemeat out of a poor, injury-filled Swiss team? Villa, with 8 goals in the last 9 matches, would surely put away a couple against this lackluster team, while Casillas would keep a clean sheet?

Yeah. No.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Chris L on June 16, 2010, 12:54:26 PM
A small point, but one thing I am enjoying about watching the games is how critical the commentators are of the players, the coachs, the play in general.

"That was a terrible cross."

"I have no idea what his plan was with that pass."

"Coach X's decision to play Player y made little sense and finally, a substitution is called."


You just don't hear this type of statement in baseball, hockey, etc...



Who is the soccer announcing equivalent of Bill Walton?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: not that clay on June 16, 2010, 06:42:48 PM
So of course my last (of round 1) desperate attempt to advance in the FOTFF ranks backfired horribly today. I went all out on Spain v Switzerland. My two most expensive players on the pitch - David Villa and Iker Casillas. Casillas as captain too. Surely the most impressive team of the last couple of years, the reigning European champions, who'd pretty much not lost a match in three-four years, would make mincemeat out of a poor, injury-filled Swiss team? Villa, with 8 goals in the last 9 matches, would surely put away a couple against this lackluster team, while Casillas would keep a clean sheet?

Yeah. No.

I had David Villa too, and Fabregas, who didn't even play. Grr.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: yesno on June 16, 2010, 07:04:59 PM
http://www.vuvuzela-time.co.uk/
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: johnintheuk on June 17, 2010, 01:21:58 PM
So of course my last (of round 1) desperate attempt to advance in the FOTFF ranks backfired horribly today. I went all out on Spain v Switzerland. My two most expensive players on the pitch - David Villa and Iker Casillas. Casillas as captain too. Surely the most impressive team of the last couple of years, the reigning European champions, who'd pretty much not lost a match in three-four years, would make mincemeat out of a poor, injury-filled Swiss team? Villa, with 8 goals in the last 9 matches, would surely put away a couple against this lackluster team, while Casillas would keep a clean sheet?

Yeah. No.

I had David Villa too, and Fabregas, who didn't even play. Grr.

Torres and Silva here. I was hoping for big points from these two but Silva was quiet and Torres is still recovering from injury, only played 29 minutes and didn't do too well.

Hopefully they'll do better in round 2...
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: dave from knoxville on June 17, 2010, 07:19:12 PM
http://www.theonion.com/articles/south-african-vuvuzela-philharmonic-angered-by-soc,17625/
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: dave from knoxville on June 17, 2010, 07:20:17 PM
""Do you know how difficult it is to get everyone situated, tuned, and focused for a vuvuzela concert?" said Julliard-trained vuvuzelist Donald Frederick Gordon, a noted soloist and renowned performer whose boyhood dream of playing vuvuzela in every stadium in South Africa is now at risk. "These brash, inconsiderate outbursts of impromptu athletics have made us a laughingstock of the international music community. We have already had cancellations from the Vienna Boy's Choir and guest director Seiji Ozawa, who no doubt fear for their reputation should the Philharmonic continue to be mocked by these incongruous sportsmen.""
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 17, 2010, 07:31:22 PM
Believe it or nuts, but the Swedish avant/electronica composer Håkan Lidbo was just commissioned by Swedish public radio P2 (a channel playing mostly classical music) to compose a piece for vuvuzela. It's gonna be three minutes long, and it's supposed to be done by next week. I'll be sure to link to it when it premieres.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: fonpr on June 17, 2010, 08:03:24 PM
Believe it or nuts, but the Swedish avant/electronica composer Håkan Lidbo was just commissioned by Swedish public radio P2 (a channel playing mostly classical music) to compose a piece for vuvuzela. It's gonna be three minutes long, and it's supposed to be done by next week. I'll be sure to link to it when it premieres.

Is Han Bennink involved, Martin?

Spell-check doesn't recognize Han?   We're doomed!
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Stan on June 17, 2010, 10:28:12 PM
A small point, but one thing I am enjoying about watching the games is how critical the commentators are of the players, the coachs, the play in general.

"That was a terrible cross."

"I have no idea what his plan was with that pass."

"Coach X's decision to play Player y made little sense and finally, a substitution is called."


You just don't hear this type of statement in baseball, hockey, etc...



 Clearly you don't watch Mets games on SNY.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v642/alembic14/KeithHernandezcard-1.jpg)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: not that clay on June 21, 2010, 11:58:56 PM
Samir, are you trying to lose? What's going on?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 22, 2010, 07:29:39 AM
Yeah, what hell samir? Even Tom's auto-picks are beating you right now.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on June 22, 2010, 07:52:35 AM
Wow, bottom of both my leagues. That is truly diabolical.

I will say that in any other tournament, picking German and Italian defenders would be considered a "sure thing."

Secondly, my insistence to play as many Arsenal players as possible is foolish at best.

You know things are bad when literally one goal has been scored by your team all tournament.

I'm as good as Switzerland.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on June 23, 2010, 11:58:19 AM
Well, that's extraordinary.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Josh on June 23, 2010, 09:51:45 PM
Congrats En-ger-land! You deserve this:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhSZFrII40Y[/youtube]
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: redmedicine on June 24, 2010, 12:58:19 PM
Arrivederci, buona notte!

(http://www.funnyphotos.net.au/userimages/user756_1151540713.JPG)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: buffcoat on June 24, 2010, 03:45:23 PM
I couldn't be happier that Flop-Town got sent home to a deeply inferior squad.  You represent everything that's wrong with soccer, yeah, there I said it.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: redmedicine on June 24, 2010, 04:46:57 PM
Congrats En-ger-land! You deserve this:

I have to say, MC Deuce (see first post in thread) may have better flow than John Barnes. Though both of them outperform the 1986 Mets.  By that logic, US Soccer > English Soccer > All baseball.  Right?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Sarah on June 25, 2010, 08:41:29 AM
Say, what about that tennis match?  Long, huh?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 26, 2010, 03:39:30 AM
Really long.

FOTFF-ers: don't forget to pick your squad for the fourth round - unlimited transfers!
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Sarah on June 26, 2010, 08:15:23 AM
Sweet of you to offer that pity response, Martin.  More than I deserved.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: nec13 on June 26, 2010, 05:31:12 PM
A valiant effort by the U.S., but they came up just short.

Try again in 2014.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: yesno on June 26, 2010, 06:00:46 PM
Any oil in Ghana?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: it'sdevin on June 27, 2010, 01:24:20 AM
(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/41738/tedleoworldcup.jpg)

A little Best Show/World Cup crossover action.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on June 27, 2010, 04:29:39 AM
That's awesome!
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: redmedicine on June 29, 2010, 07:35:51 PM
So, on the top half of the bracket, Brazil has a fairly clear path to the finals.  Who are they going to meet there out of Argentina, Germany, and Spain?  My heart says Argentina, but my head says Germany.  I would love to see Maradona and Messi's madcap style rewarded over the more measured approach of the other teams.  But, I fear that Argentina's defense will not be able to stand up to Spain or Germany. 
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: ben on June 30, 2010, 01:10:22 AM
So, on the top half of the bracket, Brazil has a fairly clear path to the finals.  Who are they going to meet there out of Argentina, Germany, and Spain?  My heart says Argentina, but my head says Germany.  I would love to see Maradona and Messi's madcap style rewarded over the more measured approach of the other teams.  But, I fear that Argentina's defense will not be able to stand up to Spain or Germany.  

What about the Netherlands?  They seem legitimate.

I'd love to see Paraguay win though.  I'm a big Francisco Solano Lopez fan.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: gravy boat on June 30, 2010, 09:48:33 AM
Holy moly,  I am excited for the Argentina-Germany match.  Germany, to me, has been one of the pleasant surprises--with their young players like Oezil, they have been more of an attacking team than some German teams I remember.  On the other side, Tevez and Messi are so much fun to watch.

I am still backing the Dutch but Brazil looks like the team to beat.

I am not sold on Spain so far -maybe because it seemed like they were trying to not only outscore but out dive Ronaldo and his teammates yesterday.




Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: redmedicine on June 30, 2010, 04:16:52 PM
The Netherlands have played very well against some fairly decent opponents, but I don't think they could beat any of the big four left in the competition.  I haven't seen them dominate the play as much as Germany or even Spain.  There was an interesting article (http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2010/jun/29/world-cup-letter-from-netherlands (http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2010/jun/29/world-cup-letter-from-netherlands)) in The Guardian about the team.  that being said, it would be great to see them upset Brazil, but I don't see that happening.

Spain has done very well, but their success seems mainly due to David Villa.  If he has an off night, Torres hasn't shown yet if he can step up in this tournament.

I agree about Germany, they have been very exciting to watch.  Dynamic offense, organized defending, and youth have made them so different than the German teams of old.  Not to mention the fact that their best player is a 20 year old of Turkish ancestry.

Here's my ranking of the 8 teams left, based on how they've played in the World Cup only:

1. Germany
2. Argentina
3. Brazil
4. Spain
5. Netherlands
6. Uruguay (the Forlan/Suarez tag team have produced some beautiful goals)
7. Ghana
8. Paraguay
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: ben on July 01, 2010, 01:28:37 AM
I read Soccernomics recently.  Now I know who Luther Blissett is. 

I found it really interesting, much better than Moneyball which it is comparable to.  A nice companion piece to the World Cup. 
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: yesno on July 01, 2010, 10:08:31 AM
Is there a soccer equivalent to "Watching Baseball Smarter"?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: redmedicine on July 02, 2010, 09:41:40 PM
The Netherlands have played very well against some fairly decent opponents, but I don't think they could beat any of the big four left in the competition.  I haven't seen them dominate the play as much as Germany or even Spain.  There was an interesting article (http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2010/jun/29/world-cup-letter-from-netherlands (http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2010/jun/29/world-cup-letter-from-netherlands)) in The Guardian about the team.  that being said, it would be great to see them upset Brazil, but I don't see that happening.

Spain has done very well, but their success seems mainly due to David Villa.  If he has an off night, Torres hasn't shown yet if he can step up in this tournament.

I agree about Germany, they have been very exciting to watch.  Dynamic offense, organized defending, and youth have made them so different than the German teams of old.  Not to mention the fact that their best player is a 20 year old of Turkish ancestry.

Here's my ranking of the 8 teams left, based on how they've played in the World Cup only:

1. Germany
2. Argentina
3. Brazil
4. Spain
5. Netherlands
6. Uruguay (the Forlan/Suarez tag team have produced some beautiful goals)
7. Ghana
8. Paraguay

Well, shut my mouth!  Heartbreaker for Ghana today as well.  Two excellent games today, in what was supposed to be the less interesting bracket.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: thom on July 02, 2010, 10:58:25 PM
Who wrote that Ghana-Uruguay game? Cameron Crowe?

It was too much.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Gilly on July 02, 2010, 11:34:22 PM
Just like intentional fouls in basketball or other things like that, I find that handball unsportsmanlike. Why do you play an entire game if you're just going to allow a team to manipulate the rules in desperation in the end. Some would call it strategy, I'd say they've lost the plot of what sports are supposed to be.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on July 03, 2010, 04:32:20 AM
Well, it was a desperate act, certainly unsportsmanlike, which is why he was sent off and Ghana was awarded a penalty. The circumstances were extreme - last kick of the game - but there's really no way to argue that Suarez 'should' have kept his arms down for sportsmanlike reasons. "Oh well, we lost, but at least we did the right thing there at the end." He did what he did and was sent off for it. And it was probably more of a reflex than a conscious decision anyway.

To argue that it was a conscious effort by Uruguay to manipulate the rules seems absurd to me - Gyan had scored two penalties in the tournament prior to this last-second one, so the odds were clearly in Ghana's favor to score and win the match. But alas, he missed. And the shoot-outs went Uruguay's way too.

Great match. Uruguay will be severly handicapped in the semi though (possibly against Spain) (EDIT: they're facing Holland, obviously). Both Lugano (the captain, out with injury) and Suarez are out, and possibly more - didn't notice if anyone got a yellow card which will rule them out of the next match.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on July 03, 2010, 10:56:57 AM
Quote
"The Hand of God now belongs to me. Mine is the real Hand Of God," said Suárez. "I made the best save of the tournament. Sometimes in training I play as a goalkeeper so it was worth it. There was no alternative but for me to do that and when they missed the penalty I thought 'It is a miracle and we are alive in the tournament'.

"Now we are in the semi-finals although I was very sad because no one likes to be sent off. The celebration afterwards was impressive, but very quiet because nobody gave us a chance but, with courage, we move forward."

Well, he doesn't feel bad about it.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/jul/03/world-cup-2010-hand-god-suarez
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on July 03, 2010, 08:12:32 PM
Moving on:

Holy smokes that was two amazing matches today. Germany ÜBER ALLES and then the most dramatic match I've seen*.

*) been invested in
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: senorcorazon on July 04, 2010, 08:36:24 AM
I think the rule for the World Cup this year has been "Think this game is going to be a stinker and that one will be great? Think again, you footballadummy."
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: senorcorazon on July 04, 2010, 08:39:37 AM
Also, time to start going back to look at the predictions on page 3.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Gilly on July 05, 2010, 01:02:06 AM
I had the third worst score this past round and managed to advance. My first knockout round wasn't so hot either. And now I'm already down 0 to -3 to Martin since I needed to make 5 transfers. 
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on July 05, 2010, 07:44:07 AM
Now I feel like a McDonald's FIFA World Cup Fantasy-dummy! I had no idea that the FF turned into an elimination round after the group stages... I just thought it would be league play til the end - highest points win - and now it turns out I've been unknowingly crushing the opposition in both the last 16 and the quarters. Sorry for my ignorance, everybody. Now I feel like I've been missing out on some exciting drama.

Oh, and Gilly, you're going DOWN.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: senorcorazon on July 05, 2010, 02:40:33 PM
Let's not talk about it. It's still burns me that I got the second-highest score in the elimination rounds during the quarters but got knocked out because Wes squeezed out 4 more points (well played Wes). I am obviously devoting FAR TOO MUCH TIME to this endeavor and need to reexamine life choices. 
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: joe on July 05, 2010, 03:08:38 PM
Wow, I didn't know it was an elimination tournament either.  But apparently I barely eked out a victory against BPH to make it to the semis.  You're next, Wes!
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on July 08, 2010, 01:20:24 PM
Wes vs. Martin in the real final.

How's everyone betting?

(Also, Spain will face Holland in some secondary contest.)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: gravy boat on July 08, 2010, 02:21:11 PM
Wes vs. Martin in the real final. How's everyone betting?

An American v. a European in football? Is this even a serious question?



(Also, Spain will face Holland in some secondary contest.)

Pulling for the Dutch, thinking Spain. Anyhow, it will be nice for a new country to take the top prize.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Wes on July 08, 2010, 03:02:27 PM
Wes vs. Martin in the real final. How's everyone betting?
An American v. a European in football? Is this even a serious question?

Not just an American. The American.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: senorcorazon on July 08, 2010, 09:33:26 PM
I am the Al Gore in this situation, denied by technicalities. So I will dispute this and go get an Oscar and a Nobel Prize. Enjoy your little game.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on July 12, 2010, 08:06:44 AM
Congratulations: Spain.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on July 12, 2010, 08:58:25 AM
Congratulations: Wes.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on July 12, 2010, 09:32:12 AM
Nobody cares about that.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: senorcorazon on July 12, 2010, 10:27:24 AM
Nobody cares about that.

Agreed. Especially not me. I did not curse at the top of my lungs when I got home last night about finishing second.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Wes on July 12, 2010, 10:35:59 AM
I don't want to call myself a hero...so if somebody else wants to go ahead and do that, I would appreciate it.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Matthew_S on July 12, 2010, 01:37:38 PM
I don't want to call myself a hero...so if somebody else wants to go ahead and do that, I would appreciate it.


You're a hero.


I enjoyed following the tournament and perhaps now, I will continue to follow the sport, year round.  I have tried before and failed, in essence by being overwhelmed with info.  Is there an easy way to keep up with the relevant events of the sport, i.e. an essential podcast, a website with good 'general' articles/updates ??
It has also been suggested that it is best simply to pick an English Premier League team and follow them. 

Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on July 12, 2010, 05:18:32 PM
I enjoyed following the tournament and perhaps now, I will continue to follow the sport, year round.  I have tried before and failed, in essence by being overwhelmed with info.  Is there an easy way to keep up with the relevant events of the sport, i.e. an essential podcast, a website with good 'general' articles/updates ??
It has also been suggested that it is best simply to pick an English Premier League team and follow them.

Martin and I enjoy the twice-weekly podcast from the Guardian. Hope you like puns.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/series/footballweekly
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: NJL on July 12, 2010, 05:38:23 PM
I enjoyed following the tournament and perhaps now, I will continue to follow the sport, year round.  I have tried before and failed, in essence by being overwhelmed with info.  Is there an easy way to keep up with the relevant events of the sport, i.e. an essential podcast, a website with good 'general' articles/updates ??
It has also been suggested that it is best simply to pick an English Premier League team and follow them.

Martin and I enjoy the twice-weekly podcast from the Guardian. Hope you like puns.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/series/footballweekly

Does it involve Andy Zaltzman?
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: cutout on July 12, 2010, 05:53:17 PM
I use Netvibes and have a big wall 'o soccer feeds/widgets that keep me up to speed -

(http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/9389/netvibess.png)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on July 12, 2010, 06:03:42 PM
Football Weekly is the gold standard of football podcasts, at least if your main interest is the English Premier League. Very entertaining, informative, witty, whathaveyou.

And yeah, that's probably the easiest way to get started - pick an English team and follow them. The PL is a very easy league to get into.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: samir on August 13, 2010, 09:23:47 AM
It's back!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/audio/2010/aug/12/football-weekly-new-season-preview (http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/audio/2010/aug/12/football-weekly-new-season-preview)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on August 13, 2010, 09:25:08 AM
Football Weekly preview: digested!
TV channels who provide PL coverage in Sweden: updated!

I'm ready!
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: MarcInLiverpool on August 13, 2010, 08:01:49 PM
I use Netvibes and have a big wall 'o soccer feeds/widgets that keep me up to speed -

Liverpool fan CutOut?

If anyone is still deciding on which team to follow I would recommend Liverpool for the emotional ups and downs they've given fans over the years. Arsenal if you want an excuse to visit London. Avoid Manchester City, Chelsea and Man Utd.

When I use to watch MLB I got stuck with The Mets as it just happened to be the first full game I watched. The Braves were their opponents but I preferred Mike Piazza over Chipper Jones.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: cutout on August 14, 2010, 01:08:05 AM
Quote
Liverpool fan CutOut?

Yep

Quote
I would recommend Liverpool for the emotional ups and downs they've given fans over the years

Yes

Quote
Avoid Manchester City, Chelsea and Man Utd.

YES
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Martin on August 14, 2010, 03:20:42 AM
cutout gets it.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: redmedicine on August 20, 2010, 06:12:09 PM
Thanks for the tips, Martin and Samir.  Between the podcasts and the magnum opus book I'm reading at the moment (The Ball is Round by Goldblatt), I'm actually starting to understand the world of association football.  Coming at it from just watching internationals, it is a bit disconcerting still to see Tevez playing with Silva and De Jong for example, but I'm getting used to it.  With a grand total of two EPL games and a few summer friendlies under my belt, I'm liking Celtic (SPL, I know) and Tottenham. 

I'm still impressed that you guys can keep up with this stuff.  Adding Spain, Germany, and Italy to the mix as well as Champions League and Europa Cup makes my brain hurt.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Jason on August 20, 2010, 07:39:46 PM
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dEcZSkQCIuk/TEH6LlvFO-I/AAAAAAAAK54/Pi9rwifVZuA/s1600/530px-Barnet_FC_svg.png)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: cutout on August 21, 2010, 12:11:06 AM
I'm still impressed that you guys can keep up with this stuff.  Adding Spain, Germany, and Italy to the mix as well as Champions League and Europa Cup makes my brain hurt.

Browsing footytube between games just to keep up on goals and highlights helps a bit -

http://www.footytube.com/ (http://www.footytube.com/)
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Wes on June 12, 2014, 09:12:05 AM
Wes vs. Martin in the real final. How's everyone betting?
An American v. a European in football? Is this even a serious question?

Not just an American. The American.

Congratulations: Wes.

I don't want to call myself a hero...so if somebody else wants to go ahead and do that, I would appreciate it.

Happy "World Cup" everybody! I hope everyone has a "goal" of enjoying what I like to call "the beautiful game" as much as I will. My take, as an expert on the sport, is that we just might be in for some pretty spectacular action on the ol' pitch this time around.

-Dr. Soccer
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: buffcoat on June 16, 2014, 11:20:41 AM
My friend's three-year-old watching the World Cup: "Daddy, why don't those girls pick up the ball and throw it?"

I love the World Cup. I've adjusted to the significant possibility of a 0-0 tie in any particular game, I've adjusted to an enormous field and to long stretches where it seems like nothing happens.

What I will never adjust to is grown men faking injuries and being rewarded for it (cf. Honduras' entire strategy yesterday, and "Italy"). Flopping is justly called out, fined and ridiculed in the NBA, almost does not exist in American football - soccer needs a Reformation.
Title: Re: World Cup
Post by: Big Plastic Head on June 17, 2014, 12:02:10 PM
My friend's three-year-old watching the World Cup: "Daddy, why don't those girls pick up the ball and throw it?"

I love the World Cup. I've adjusted to the significant possibility of a 0-0 tie in any particular game, I've adjusted to an enormous field and to long stretches where it seems like nothing happens.

What I will never adjust to is grown men faking injuries and being rewarded for it (cf. Honduras' entire strategy yesterday, and "Italy"). Flopping is justly called out, fined and ridiculed in the NBA, almost does not exist in American football - soccer needs a Reformation.

11 matches, only one tie so far? Pretty great start.

Yeah, the flopping is bad. It's frustrating to see but when you watch how someone like Messi rarely falls...it's what you hope to see. The MLS is getting better at calling and handing out fines for embellishment (http://www.mlssoccer.com/video/2014/06/05/sebastian-fernandez-embellishment-mls-disciplinary-committee-action) and I hope it is enforced more (http://www.mlssoccer.com/news/article/2014/05/06/mls-disciplinary-committee-fines-la-galaxy-forward-rob-friend-embellishment).

I may have posted this before but it's still pretty great...

Lionel Messi never falls never dives. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEaaSfRKjF0#)