Better for Gentleman's Clubs: Sweat Pants or Athletic Shorts?

[yesno]

A utilikilt?

[Christina]

A utilikilt?

Oh, you beat me to it, you fart.

[gravy boat]

A utilikilt?

Yeesh, day one and we are already just one "power tool" joke away from Standards and Practices yanking the PG 13 rating and then this all goes away. 

[Keith Whitener]

Let's take this in a different direction then. I'd like a philosophical analysis of the Mike Show/ Sick Clique aesthetic. Let's cap it off with an adjective of our own creation/appropriation that shouts "Mike!" It could just be "Mike!"

[masterofsparks]

Kilt.

[FrankFromWeehawken]

Windbreaker pants (could this fall into tracksuit territory?).  Least amount of friction/resistance.

[buffcoat]

At a bachelor party (at which the groom's sister's boyfriend was buying his girlfriend's dad AND himself lap dance after lap dance) I saw a guy drop $3,500 in an hour, which is chump change for Vegas but quite a bit for Raleigh.


He was wearing... gray athletic shorts.

[acslater]

Aren't bike shorts, the fourth choice, also considered athletic shorts - choice two? So confusing.  Who did this poll - the genius who wrote the gay marriage question for Maine?

Bike shorts are spandex/lycra and very form fitting versus athletic shorts are more akin to basketball shorts.

Sweatpants
-Pros: Cheap, have pockets to hold ID and wad of soggy sweaty dollar bills
-Cons: Stains more easily

Athletic Shorts
-Pros: Look cool, lets everyone know you're sporty; Stains less easily with multi-colored fabrics
-Cons: May not have pockets

[Lyle Hemmings]

breakaway pants, obviously

[JustNicole]

I chose Other.  I think velour would be most appropriate.