Unfair Record Review Request

[Laurie]

Guinness tastes like ass. I drink Yuengling because it's kind of spicy and Blue Moon because it's kind of fruity. I'm a girl. Oh, and if neither of those are available, which is often the case in Miami, I get Heineken, because that's the only fucking option. I'm not drinking Budweiser.

[TL]

Guinness tastes like ass. I drink Yuengling because it's kind of spicy and Blue Moon because it's kind of fruity. I'm a girl. Oh, and if neither of those are available, which is often the case in Miami, I get Heineken, because that's the only fucking option. I'm not drinking Budweiser.

Fair enough!

[Sarah]

Interesting about the isinglas.  Hell, interesting to learn that meaning of isinglass (I was only familiar with the mica variation).  I think you should host a regular feature, "Ask a Vegan," to clear up these matters for the ignorant among us (such as I).  For example, there's my french fry question of a while back: why are they not vegan as long as they're cooked in a vegetable oil?

I think you should have stayed in that bar, though.  Could have been great. 

Paul?  I think this thread is very close to a regular conversation, which means that it's about anything, everything, and nothing.

[TL]

Interesting about the isinglas.  Hell, interesting to learn that meaning of isinglass (I was only familiar with the mica variation).  I think you should host a regular feature, "Ask a Vegan," to clear up these matters for the ignorant among us (such as I).  For example, there's my french fry question of a while back: why are they not vegan as long as they're cooked in a vegetable oil?

I think you should have stayed in that bar, though.  Could have been great. 

Paul?  I think this thread is very close to a regular conversation, which means that it's about anything, everything, and nothing.

Oh yeah - the french fry thing - I think my question was how they fit into the macrobiotic diet, not whether they were vegan or not.  Macro is something I can never fully get my head around - I mean, the concept makes complete sense, but what "is" and what "isn't" gets a little muddled for me sometimes.
As far as the Irish bar goes...  I mean - hey - I love the "auld songs" as much as anyone, maybe more - but I felt like it would have eventually come out that, although I will gladly make a chioce of whiskey based on relative corporate values, I'm entirely sick of sectarian bullshit everywhere, and therefore unwilling to condone the violence that was supremely evident in their eyes, and therefore could easily have wound up on the receiving end of it at some point later in the evening...
And therefore might not be here chatting with the fine likes of you!

[dave from knoxville]

Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other thread

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Tom Waits just needs an editor.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comments elude me.

Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 

Spot on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them.  Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal.  Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album?  Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.

Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.

I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one.  They're just awful.  Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.

At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her.  Radiohead just copies.  No that there's anything wrong with copying.  But it's just that they're not particularly good at it.  Their music is so lifeless sounding.

Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music.  What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.

Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.

Feud over on my end, ok?

When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature.  You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.

That's my 2 cents on this issue.

Do what now?

Ditto!

I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section.  Like this:

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Really?

Tom Waits just needs an editor.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

Totally!!

Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comments elude me.

Well said!

Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 

Spot on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them.  Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal.  Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album?  Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.

Indubitably!

Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.

O.k. - that one I actually don't get...  but you get the picture!
Etc.














Right?

 Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.

I disagree with some points, agree with others.

I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.

It's kind of beautiful, in a way.

Eh. Beauty is overrated.

I see your point, but I also see other points too.

Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.

But not too quickly.  More like mid-speed.

Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together.

The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.

All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?

Yeah, I...  wait...  I forgot what i was gonna say...

Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!

Ha!  Silly me!  Now I forgot to actually type it in!  Ha ha ha!   
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!

 

I'm missing the Guinness thing.  Did they endorse some Met exhibit?  Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?

I call for a thread do-over.

Ian, it seems so...  inadequate now.  Doesn't it?

I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.

No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).

what's this thread about?

[Sarah]

. . . and therefore could easily have wound up on the receiving end of it at some point later in the evening...

I know, I know.  It would only have worked if you kept very quiet--and even that could have been dangerous.  But it could have been very interesting, if you could have avoided getting pummeled.

[paul]

Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other thread

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Tom Waits just needs an editor.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comments elude me.

Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 

Spot on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them.  Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal.  Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album?  Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.

Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.

I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one.  They're just awful.  Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.

At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her.  Radiohead just copies.  No that there's anything wrong with copying.  But it's just that they're not particularly good at it.  Their music is so lifeless sounding.

Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music.  What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.

Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.

Feud over on my end, ok?

When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature.  You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.

That's my 2 cents on this issue.

Do what now?

Ditto!

I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section.  Like this:

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Really?

Tom Waits just needs an editor.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

Totally!!

Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comments elude me.

Well said!

Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 

Spot on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them.  Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal.  Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album?  Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.

Indubitably!

Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.

O.k. - that one I actually don't get...  but you get the picture!
Etc.














Right?

 Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.

I disagree with some points, agree with others.

I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.

It's kind of beautiful, in a way.

Eh. Beauty is overrated.

I see your point, but I also see other points too.

Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.

But not too quickly.  More like mid-speed.

Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together.

The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.

All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?

Yeah, I...  wait...  I forgot what i was gonna say...

Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!

Ha!  Silly me!  Now I forgot to actually type it in!  Ha ha ha!   
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!

 

I'm missing the Guinness thing.  Did they endorse some Met exhibit?  Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?

I call for a thread do-over.

Ian, it seems so...  inadequate now.  Doesn't it?

I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.

No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).

what's this thread about?

[paul]

[
#msg19246 date=1195152546]

Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other thread

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]

[quote author.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comm
Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]

273 date=1195157050]

[quote author.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radioheadents elude me.

Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 

Spot on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them.  Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal.  Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album?  Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.

Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.

I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one.  They're just awful.  Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.

At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her.  Radiohead just copies.  No that there's anything wrong with copying.  But it's just that they're not particularly good at it.  Their music is so lifeless sounding.

Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music.  What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.

Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.

Feud over on my end, ok?

When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature.  You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.

That's my 2 cents on this issue.

Do what now?

Ditto!

Really?

I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section.  Like this:

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Tom Waits just needs an editor.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

Totally!!

Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comments elude me.
[/quote]

Well said!

parts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section.  Like this:

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Tom Waits just needs an editor.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

[/u]

Totally!!
 

[/s]

Robert Pollard needs an editor, To :-Xm Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comments elude me.

Well said!

[/right]
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.  [/color] Spo ???t on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead
Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 

Spo ???t on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet love :Ds them.  Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal.  Remember when Perry Farrell rele :-*ased a drum and bass album?  Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.

Indubitably!

Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.

O.k. - that one I actually don't get...  but you get the picture!
Etc.














Right?

 Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.

I disagree with some points, [/i] agree with others.

I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.

It's kind of beautiful, in a way.

Eh. Beauty is overrated.

I see your point, but I also see other points too.

Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.

But not too quickly.  More like mid-speed.

Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together.

The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.

All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?

Yeah, I...  wait...  I forgot what i was gonna say...

Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!

Ha!  Silly me!  Now I forgot to actually type it in!  Ha ha ha!   
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!

 

I'm missing the Guinness thing.  Did they endorse some Met exhibit?  Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?

I call for a thread do-over.

Ian, it seems so...  inadequate now.  Doesn't it?

I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.

No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).

what's this thread about?

REEEEEEEEMIX!!!!!!

[Forrest]

[
#msg19246 date=1195152546]

Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other thread

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]

[quote author.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comm
Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]

273 date=1195157050]

[quote author.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radioheadents elude me.

Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 

Spot on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them.  Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal.  Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album?  Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.

Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.

I've listened to every Radiohead album relatively closely, including the new one.  They're just awful.  Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.

At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her.  Radiohead just copies.  No that there's anything wrong with copying.  But it's just that they're not particularly good at it.  Their music is so lifeless sounding.

Unlike Perry Farrell's flirtation with drum and bass, choosing to copy sounds from Aphex Twin and so on at least exhibits better taste in music.  What I hear in Radiohead is not good music, but the result of a good music collection.

Yeah, Radiohead's real proggy, the way they don't even have a song over five and a half minutes long and everything is verse-chorus-verse. Why do you keep bringing up Bjork and Perry Farrell? neither of them sound like eachother or Radiohead at all.

Feud over on my end, ok?

When you end up having a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote within a quote above what you write, it kind of defeats the purpose of the "quote" feature.  You may as well just type a reply and take it on faith that a truly invested reader will read all or most of the posts that precede your posts.

That's my 2 cents on this issue.

Do what now?

Ditto!

Really?

I think the idea is just to take the parts from above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section.  Like this:

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Tom Waits just needs an editor.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

Totally!!

Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comments elude me.
[/quote]

Well said!

parts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section.  Like this:

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Tom Waits just needs an editor.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

[/u]

Totally!!
 

[/s]

Robert Pollard needs an editor, To :-Xm Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comments elude me.

Well said!

[/right]
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.  [/color] Spo ???t on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead
Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 

Spo ???t on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet love :Ds them.  Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal.  Remember when Perry Farrell rele :-*ased a drum and bass album?  Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.

Indubitably!

Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.

O.k. - that one I actually don't get...  but you get the picture!
Etc.














Right?

 Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.

I disagree with some points, [/i] agree with others.

I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.

It's kind of beautiful, in a way.

Eh. Beauty is overrated.

I see your point, but I also see other points too.

Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.

But not too quickly.  More like mid-speed.

Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together.

The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.

All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?

Yeah, I...  wait...  I forgot what i was gonna say...

Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!

Ha!  Silly me!  Now I forgot to actually type it in!  Ha ha ha!   
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!

 

I'm missing the Guinness thing.  Did they endorse some Met exhibit?  Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?

I call for a thread do-over.

Ian, it seems so...  inadequate now.  Doesn't it?

I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.

No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).

what's this thread about?

REEEEEEEEMIX!!!!!!

Dare I say that we invented the remix?

[paul]

[
#msg19246 date=1195152546]

[/size]

topic=1486.msg19145#msg19145 date=1195084193]

Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other thread

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]

[quote author.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comm
Tom Waits
 

[/s]

Robert Pollard needs an editor, To :-Xm Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comments elude me.

Well said!

[/right]
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.  [/color] Spo ???t on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead
Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 

Spo ???t on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet love :Dsjust needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]

273 date=1195157050]

[quote author.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radioheadents elude me.

Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 

Spot on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them.  Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal.  Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album?  Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.

Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.[/u]

I've listened to every Radiohead album [/glow] relatively closely, including the new one.  They're just awffrom [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section.  Like this:
[quote authorTom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

buffcoat link=topic=1486.msg19055#msg19055 date=1195004570]

parts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted =dave from knoxville link=topic=1486.msg19060#msg19060 date=119501428

parts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section.  Like this:

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Tom Waits just neethey invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

[/u]omments ds an editor.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

buffcoat link=topic=1486.msg19055#msg19055 date=1195004570]

parts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section.  Like this:

Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead c1195014286]

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Tom Waits just needs an editor.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my

[/u]

Totally!! them.  Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal.  Remember when Perry Farrell rele :-*ased a drum and bass album?  Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.

Indubitably!

Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.

O.k. - that one I actually don't get...  but you get the picture!
Etc.




Right?

(Wrong)



ul.  Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.

At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. 

Radiohead just copies.  No that there's anything wrong with copying.  ButTom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

[/u]omments elude me.
[/quote]

[/pre]
Well said!

parts

 Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.

I disagree with some points, [/i] agree with others.

I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.

It's kind of beautiful, in a way.

Eh. Beauty is overrated.[/s]

I see your point, but I also see other points too.

Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.

But not too quickly.  More like mid-speed.

[/right]
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together.

The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.

All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?

Yeah, I...  wait...  I forgot what i was gonna say...

Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!

Ha!  Silly me!  Now I forgot to actually type it in!  Ha ha ha!   
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!

 

I'm missing the Guinness thing.  Did they endorse some Met exhibit?  Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?

I call for a thread do-over.

Ian, it seems so...  inadequate now.  Doesn't it?

I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.

No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).

what's this thread about?

REEEEEEEEMIX!!!!!!

Dare I say that we invented the remix?

MUPPETS

[TL]

This is getting really good.

[buffcoat]

The Kid A version of Morning Bell may be the single greatest thing ever recorded.

[Stan]

[
#msg19246 date=1195152546]

[/size]

topic=1486.msg19145#msg19145 date=1195084193]

Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other thread

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

[move]
Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]

[quote author.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

[move]

Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comm
Tom Waits
 

[/s]

Robert Pollard needs an editor, To :-Xm Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comments elude me.

Well said!

[/right]
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.  [/color] Spo ???t on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead
Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 

Spo ???t on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet love :Dsjust needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]

273 date=1195157050]

[quote author.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radioheadents elude me.

Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 

Spot on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them.  Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal.  Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album?  Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.

Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.[/u]

I've listened to every Radiohead album [/glow] relatively closely, including the new one.  They're just awffrom above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section.  Like this:[/move]
[quote authorTom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

buffcoat link=topic=1486.msg19055#msg19055 date=1195004570]

parts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted =dave from knoxville link=topic=1486.msg19060#msg19060 date=119501428

parts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section.  Like this:

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Tom Waits just neethey invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

[/u]omments ds an editor.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

buffcoat link=topic=1486.msg19055#msg19055 date=1195004570]

parts from [/move] above that you're directly referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section.  Like this:

Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead c1195014286]

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

Tom Waits just needs an editor.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my

[/u]

Totally!! them.  Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal.  Remember when Perry Farrell rele :-*ased a drum and bass album?  Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.

Indubitably!

Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.

O.k. - that one I actually don't get...  but you get the picture!
Etc.




Right?

(Wrong)



ul.  Boring, indie prog rock with uninteresting IDM touches.
At least Bjork just went and *hired* people from the electronic music world to create her albums for her. 

Radiohead just copies.  No that there's anything wrong with copying.  ButTom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

[/u]omments elude me.
[/quote]

[/pre]
Well said!

parts

 Dude, it's like you dared me to quote that.

I disagree with some points, [/i] agree with others.

I'm neutral on this matter, but, as you can see, I am pro-quoting.

It's kind of beautiful, in a way.

Eh. Beauty is overrated.[/s]

I see your point, but I also see other points too.

Actually, when you scroll down quickly it looks really cool.

But not too quickly.  More like mid-speed.

[/right]
Yeah, I see what you mean. The sidelinescome out at you. Not to get all mushy, but we all built that together.

The quotes boxes are starting to look like something I saw at the Abstract Expressionism exhibit at the Met.

All right, gang. This is no time to get lazy. Do we want to bring this to an end or do we want the FOT on the horn with Guinness?

Yeah, I...  wait...  I forgot what i was gonna say...

Oh yeah - that's right - i remember!

Ha!  Silly me!  Now I forgot to actually type it in!  Ha ha ha!   
I was gonna say that Guiness or no Guiness, I'm just happy to have been able to participate!

 

I'm missing the Guinness thing.  Did they endorse some Met exhibit?  Do they pay for Matthew Barney's expensive nonsense?

I call for a thread do-over.

Ian, it seems so...  inadequate now.  Doesn't it?

I'm pretty sure the curators at the Met haven't bought any Matthew Barney crap. That's more of a MOMA/Whitney/WAC sort of thing.

No, I meant Guinness sponsoring Barney because of his use of the Harp symbology (which I know is actually significant to the Irish and not a trademark, so don't get mad at me, black men of Britain).

what's this thread about?

REEEEEEEEMIX!!!!!!

Dare I say that we invented the remix?

MUPPETS

[paul]

[
#msg19246 date=1195152546]

[/size]

topic=1486.msg19145#msg19145 date=1195084193]

Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other thread

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

[move]
Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]

[quote author.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

[move]

Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comm
Tom Waits
 

[/s]

Robert Pollard needs an editor, To :-Xm Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comments elude me.

Well said!

[/right]
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.  [/color] Spo ???t on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead
Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 

Spo ???t on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet love :Dsjust needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]

273 date=1195157050]

[quote author.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radioheadents elude me.

Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 
Spot on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them.  Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal.  Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album?  Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.

Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.[/u]

I've listened to every Radiohead album [/glow] relatively closely, including the new one.  They're just awffrom above that you're directly

referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section.  Like this:[/move]
[quote authorTom S. has said that he likes Radiohead

[John Junk]

[
#msg19246 date=1195152546]

[/size]

topic=1486.msg19145#msg19145 date=1195084193]

Haiku! Oh no, wait, that was that other thread

I've tried to like Tom Waits before.

[move]
Tom Waits just needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]

[quote author.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radiohead, who are the worst band ever.  Except when they invented electronic music.  Them and Bjork.

[move]

Robert Pollard needs an editor, Tom Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comm
Tom Waits
 

[/s]

Robert Pollard needs an editor, To :-Xm Waits needs a new singer and some decent clothes.

Your Radiohead comments elude me.

Well said!

[/right]
Tom Waits also needs some face cream.  [/color] Spo ???t on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead
Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 

Spo ???t on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.

My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet love :Dsjust needs an editorohn Junk link=topic=1486.msg19048#msg19048 date=1195000662]

273 date=1195157050]

[quote author.  He's one of these guys that has some good songs, some bad, and he can't seem to tell the difference.  Stephin Merritt is the same way. But Rain Dogs is one of my favorite albums. 

Tom S. has said that he likes Radioheadents elude me.

Tom Waits also needs some face cream. 
Spot on about Robert Pollard.  I am always suspicious of the quality control of the overly prolific.
My particular animus against Radiohead is in part caused by the fact that nearly every person on the Internet loves them.  Meanwhile, their music is boring and unoriginal.  Remember when Perry Farrell released a drum and bass album?  Radiohead are a slightly more successful version of that.

Pretty much everybody in reality likes Radiohead. It's not like they're the Ron Paul of current music. Listen to OK Computer or Amnesiac a little more closely and tell me it's unoriginal.[/u]

I've listened to every Radiohead album [/glow] relatively closely, including the new one.  They're just awffrom above that you're directly

referencing and leave the rest of the thread out of the quoted section.  Like this:[/move]
[quote authorTom S. has said that he likes Radiohead