Author Topic: Ted Leo under a assumed name  (Read 2650 times)

bruce

  • Guest
Ted Leo under a assumed name
« on: November 18, 2006, 08:46:26 AM »
While listening to the last podcast (archive show from March of 2002). In the last 15 minutes or so a caller called "Chris" calls up. Gee the caller sounds really familar and has a knowledge of soccer like no other. Fess up Ted I knew it was you. Don't know why you were using a diffrent name.

Dan B

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 642
Re: Ted Leo under a assumed name
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2006, 09:01:04 PM »
There need to be more  of nem classic episodes in podcast form. 

Tom Scharpling

  • I RUN THIS.
  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 900
Re: Ted Leo under a assumed name
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2006, 01:37:43 AM »
"Under a assumed name"?

I thought you liked the English language, Bruce! A little bit of patience when posting and some Spellcheck goes a long way, son.

Tom.

Sarah

  • Guest
Re: Ted Leo under a assumed name
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2006, 01:57:58 AM »
A little bit of patience when posting and some Spellcheck go a long way, son.

Plus, Bruce, "familar" and "diffrent"?  Come on.

Sorry. C'est plus fort que moi.

Jason

  • Guest
Re: Ted Leo under a assumed name
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2006, 02:40:48 AM »
Also the title should read "Ted Leo under an assumed name."

Sarah

  • Guest
Re: Ted Leo under a assumed name
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2006, 01:59:34 PM »
Isn't that what Tom was pointing out?

Jason

  • Guest
Re: Ted Leo under a assumed name
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2006, 03:40:37 PM »
Isn't that what Tom was pointing out?

Oops. Egg + Face = Me.
Once again the proofreader becomes the proofread.

John Junk

  • Guest
Re: Ted Leo under a assumed name
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2006, 04:30:27 AM »
Shouldn't that be "The proofreader becomes the proofred?"  Okay, no it shouldn't.  But it should sound like that.