Author Topic: I'd be better at ____ than Tom  (Read 13354 times)

senorcorazon

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 1120
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #45 on: September 26, 2008, 08:00:17 AM »
Solving Bernoulli Bore-noulli equations

Fixed!
[/quote]

I don't think this response was given the proper kudos. You did it again, Wes.

Julie

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 830
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #46 on: September 26, 2008, 08:23:31 AM »
Aw, come on Dave! That's nothing but numbers. Stop trying to scare people. And why is line 223 in the data twice?

Hey Julie,

This is me over here! I didn't put those numbers up there, Andy did.

Also, I love you.

Sorry, Dave. Shame on Andy. I love both of you.

Bessel functions have something to do with drum heads, right?

Curse you, aging brain!

Yes, I think they have to do with the motion of drum heads when you hit them with a drumstick. But I don't know and I'm not looking it up.
I have a long history of booing

dave from knoxville

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 5108
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #47 on: September 26, 2008, 01:23:56 PM »
Solving Bernoulli Bore-noulli equations

Fixed!

I don't think this response was given the proper kudos. You did it again, Wes.
[/quote]

Ouch. Nobody warned me not to pet the kitty.

Steve of Bloomington

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2262
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #48 on: September 26, 2008, 05:24:33 PM »
We really killed this thread dead when we brought the math.

Andy

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 6112
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #49 on: September 26, 2008, 05:53:30 PM »
internal rate of return for investment in an MBA (allegedly)
     OOP       w/o MBA       w/ MBA      NET   
1   $(5,000.00)    $(25,200.00)    $-                  $(30,200.00)   -22536.46357   IRR
2   $(5,000.00)    $(25,704.00)    $-                  $(30,704.00)   -17098.28715   34%
3       $(26,218.08)    $49,000.00     $22,781.92    9467.314311   
4       $(26,742.44)    $49,980.00     $23,237.56    7206.191383   
5       $(27,277.29)    $50,979.60     $23,702.31    5485.103012   
6       $(27,822.84)    $51,999.19     $24,176.36    4175.070221   
7       $(28,379.29)    $53,039.18     $24,659.88    3177.918685   
8       $(28,946.88)    $54,099.96     $25,153.08    2418.921512   
9       $(29,525.82)    $55,181.96     $25,656.14    1841.199181   
10       $(30,116.33)    $56,285.60     $26,169.26    1401.456974
11       $(30,718.66)    $57,411.31     $26,692.65    1066.740454
12       $(31,333.03)    $58,559.54     $27,226.50    811.9658456
13       $(31,959.69)    $59,730.73     $27,771.03    618.0402475
14       $(32,598.89)    $60,925.34     $28,326.45    470.4308063
15       $(33,250.86)    $62,143.85     $28,892.98    358.075618
16       $(33,915.88)    $63,386.72     $29,470.84    272.5547444
17       $(34,594.20)    $64,654.46     $30,060.26    207.4592209
18       $(35,286.08)    $65,947.55     $30,661.46    157.9107654
19       $(35,991.81)    $67,266.50     $31,274.69    120.1961992
20       $(36,711.64)    $68,611.83     $31,900.19    91.48917916
21       $(37,445.87)    $69,984.07     $32,538.19    69.63839086
22       $(38,194.79)    $71,383.75     $33,188.96    53.00632847
23       $(38,958.69)    $72,811.42     $33,852.73    40.34657928
24       $(39,737.86)    $74,267.65     $34,529.79    30.71041717
25       $(40,532.62)    $75,753.00     $35,220.39    23.37570469
26       $(41,343.27)    $77,268.06     $35,924.79    17.79277588
27       $(42,170.14)    $78,813.43     $36,643.29    13.54324405
28       $(43,013.54)    $80,389.69     $37,376.15    10.30864777
29       $(43,873.81)    $81,997.49     $38,123.68    7.846585238
30       $(44,751.29)    $83,637.44     $38,886.15    5.972548609
31       $(45,646.31)    $85,310.19     $39,663.87    4.546096908
32       $(46,559.24)    $87,016.39     $40,457.15    3.460331335
33       $(47,490.42)    $88,756.72     $41,266.29    2.633884228
34       $(48,440.23)    $90,531.85     $42,091.62    2.004821347
35       $(49,409.04)    $92,342.49     $42,933.45    1.526000493
             $989,606.10    2.7403E-06
Breakfast- I'm havin' a time
Wheelies- I'm havin' a time
Headlocks- I'm havin' a time
Drunk Tank- not so much a time
George St.- I'm havin' a time
Brenda- I'm havin' a time
Bingo- I'm havin' a time
House Arrest- I'm still havin' a time

Julie

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 830
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #50 on: September 27, 2008, 08:37:32 AM »
The snobby engineering students in my calculus classes used to tell this joke.

What is the limit as an engineering student's gpa goes to zero?

Business School!  :D

They all amounted to nothing, too.
I have a long history of booing

Chris L

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2780
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #51 on: September 28, 2008, 12:24:41 AM »
smuggling myself across the Russian border in a car.

Emily

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 1196
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #52 on: September 28, 2008, 12:31:21 AM »
Hey - you math people might like the movie Proof.

Bob Balaban

  • Plantar Fasciitis
  • Posts: 5
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #53 on: September 28, 2008, 02:02:10 AM »
Hey - you math people might like the movie Proof.


Fuckin' Russell Crowe was too unbelievable as, I don't know, some South African go-to guy?   Leave that shit to Leo Dicaprio.

Steve of Bloomington

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2262
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #54 on: September 28, 2008, 09:49:21 AM »
Hey - you math people might like the movie Proof.


Haven't seen it, but I'll put it in the queue.

sleepytako

  • Achilles bursitis
  • Posts: 119
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #55 on: September 28, 2008, 09:55:30 AM »
I'd be better at speaking Japanese than Tom.

Shaggy 2 Grote

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3892
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #56 on: September 28, 2008, 08:34:07 PM »
Hey - you math people might like the movie Proof.


I hate hate hate that play.  Because the math could have been anything!  It could have been the dead father's long-lost unsolved fart!  In fact, that would have been better.

Keep the numbers going, though, please. I'm kind of into it.
Oh, good heavens. I didn’t realize. I send my condolences out to the rest of the O’Connor family.

yesno

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3426
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #57 on: September 28, 2008, 11:34:12 PM »
Hey - you math people might like the movie Proof.


I hate hate hate that play.  Because the math could have been anything!  It could have been the dead father's long-lost unsolved fart!  In fact, that would have been better.

I agree.  I prefer my plays to be much more mathematically rigorous.

I've been workshopping a script that deals with quantum physics and Gödel and how, like, everything's uncertain.

dave from knoxville

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 5108
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #58 on: September 29, 2008, 10:38:45 AM »
This one's just for Groteface.

The square of 63? 3969.

But here's the kicker than makes it so hot.....I did that in my head!

Shaggy 2 Grote

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3892
Re: I'd be better at ____ than Tom
« Reply #59 on: September 29, 2008, 11:56:10 AM »
This one's just for Groteface.

The square of 63? 3969.

But here's the kicker than makes it so hot.....I did that in my head!

Oh Snap!
Oh, good heavens. I didn’t realize. I send my condolences out to the rest of the O’Connor family.