Author Topic: General Movie Thread  (Read 804641 times)

Shaggy 2 Grote

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3892
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #225 on: May 02, 2009, 03:02:33 PM »
Saw Adventureland last night and enjoyed myself thoroughly.  I also thought it was weird that there was a lesser-known VU song in an old-fashioned jukebox in a Pittsburgh dive bar, but that's a minor quibble.

What is weird to me, though, is that less than 20 years ago it would have been a firmly mainstream movie - young love, comic bits/obstacles, and so on.  But now it's indie, or art-house, or whatever.  What the fuck is happening to our culture?
Oh, good heavens. I didn’t realize. I send my condolences out to the rest of the O’Connor family.

dave from knoxville

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 5108
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #226 on: May 02, 2009, 03:07:07 PM »
Saw Adventureland last night and enjoyed myself thoroughly.  I also thought it was weird that there was a lesser-known VU song in an old-fashioned jukebox in a Pittsburgh dive bar, but that's a minor quibble.

What is weird to me, though, is that less than 20 years ago that would have been a firmly mainstream movie - young love, comic bits and obstacles, and so on.  But now it's indie, or art-house, or whatever.  What the fuck is happening to our culture?

It's completely Becked up.

nec13

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2397
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #227 on: May 02, 2009, 03:08:50 PM »
When Adventureland 2 comes out, I'm sure people will be more receptive to it.
Nobody ever lends money to a man with a sense of humor.

Shaggy 2 Grote

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3892
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #228 on: May 02, 2009, 04:24:15 PM »
That isn't my complaint, really, I'm sure plenty of people are seeing it.  I also don't really know how wide the release is.  Also I don't really care about either. 

It's more like, this pretty mainstream movie was made by Miramax (who I know are not really indie, but whatever) and playing at BAM (which I know isn't really art-house, but whatever).  I think what bugs me is, if this is what's passing as independent film these days, where can one go for the truly weird shit?  WFMU, I guess.  Or the internet.  I guess my complaint is about the general mediocrity of Anglophone culture, but I suppose that's always been the case.  Except there's something I miss about the mainstream culture of the 1980s being so far removed from everything I liked. 
Oh, good heavens. I didn’t realize. I send my condolences out to the rest of the O’Connor family.

buffcoat

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 6213
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #229 on: May 02, 2009, 04:33:30 PM »
What VU song?
I really don't appreciate your sarcastic, anti-comedy tone, Bro!

nec13

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2397
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #230 on: May 02, 2009, 04:53:12 PM »
Coney Island Steeplechase.
Nobody ever lends money to a man with a sense of humor.

Pidgeon

  • Guest
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #231 on: May 02, 2009, 09:05:36 PM »
I saw Red Beard today. Who would have guessed that what may be the greatest Kurosawa fight scene would be in a movie about a doctors in a clinic?

Shaggy 2 Grote

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3892
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #232 on: May 03, 2009, 01:12:12 PM »
And also, RG, I just got your joke about Adventureland 2.  Except it really wouldn't surprise me if they actually did this, but with none of the same people involved.  The amusement park would be in, like New Mexico this time.
Oh, good heavens. I didn’t realize. I send my condolences out to the rest of the O’Connor family.

Chris L

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2780
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #233 on: May 17, 2009, 09:29:32 PM »
If there isn't a special Mike Show devoted to Lars Von Trier's new film Antichrist I'll be gravely disappointed.  From Ebert's spoiler-y, hyperbolic report from Cannes:

Quote
Whether this is a bad, good or great film is entirely beside the point. It is an audacious spit in the eye of society. It says we harbor an undreamed-of capacity for evil. It transforms a psychological treatment into torture undreamed of in the dungeons of history. Torturers might have been capable of such actions, but they would have lacked the imagination. Von Trier is not so much making a film about violence as making a film to inflict violence upon us, perhaps as a salutary experience. It's been reported that he suffered from depression during and after the film. You can tell. This is the most despairing film I've ever have seen.

Pidgeon

  • Guest
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #234 on: May 17, 2009, 09:38:45 PM »
Well, I guess I could have spent a Sunday afternoon watching worse things.


Martin

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3629
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #235 on: May 18, 2009, 09:52:06 AM »
If there isn't a special Mike Show devoted to Lars Von Trier's new film Antichrist I'll be gravely disappointed.  From Ebert's spoiler-y, hyperbolic report from Cannes:

Quote
Whether this is a bad, good or great film is entirely beside the point. It is an audacious spit in the eye of society. It says we harbor an undreamed-of capacity for evil. It transforms a psychological treatment into torture undreamed of in the dungeons of history. Torturers might have been capable of such actions, but they would have lacked the imagination. Von Trier is not so much making a film about violence as making a film to inflict violence upon us, perhaps as a salutary experience. It's been reported that he suffered from depression during and after the film. You can tell. This is the most despairing film I've ever have seen.

I know I should probably be more excited about this film, but I just can't muster up any energy whatsoever - to be outraged, excited, whatever. OK, one thing: perhaps bored. And the reactions are so predictable - von Trier really knows what buttons to push, and Cannes is always craving a scandal.

DoodleJump!

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 793
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #236 on: May 18, 2009, 10:32:33 AM »
Well, I guess I could have spent a Sunday afternoon watching worse things.


Now you need to see this!



I actually own this poster.
"Enough with the bandana, already." -Trace Atkins to Donald Trump

jbissell

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 1807
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #237 on: May 23, 2009, 01:11:57 AM »
Just saw Terminator Salvation.  Boy was that a waste of time.

dave from knoxville

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 5108
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #238 on: May 24, 2009, 10:08:23 PM »
I hope that you will forgive me the spaminess of this post, lifted from my blog. I am interested in your opinions as to whether this is in the least bit interesting, or if it's just going to feed my OCD tapeworm. It represents between 350-400 hours of work on my part.

gaughin.edublogs.org

Project update: A-K

To recap: this ongoing project is an attempt to determine which actors who are "currently working" have amassed the most impressive selected filmographies. The basic technique is explained in a post from nearly three years ago. You can find it if you search the blog for the term "Robert Forster".


At least one disclaimer is necesary. I am going through actors alphabetically, and in almost 4 years, I have only completed letters A-K. Actors were included for assessment if a film in which they appeared had been released within three years of the date I completed their assessment. Because of that, some actors who have actually passed are included, and will be on the list until I cycle back around to them. I have limited time to work on this project, and so I am just shrugging off this glitch in the system. So yes, I fully understand that Anne Bancroft, may her soul rest in peace, is certainly not a current actor, but I will stick to my original assessment until I roll back around to her.


I believe that the updating of established assessments will go faster than the first one, and hope to eventually be able to update on a two year cycle, where it seems it is going to take at least 6 years for me to complete these initial assessments.


Here's the current 100 "most accomplished" working movie actors, WHOSE LAST NAME STARTS WITH A LETTER BETWEEN A AND K.


1) Robert DeNiro 2) Woody Allen 3) Dustin Hoffman 4) Clint Eastwood 5) Catherine Deneuve

6) Gene Hackman 7) Robert Duvall 8) Harrison Ford 9) Gerard Depardieu 10) Harvey Keitel

11) Julie Christie 12) Sean Connery 13) Johnny Depp 14) Richard Dreyfuss 15) Nicolas Cage

16) Jeff Bridges 17) John Cusack 18) Tom Hanks 19) Anthony Hopkins 20) Mel Gibson

21) Diane Keaton 22) Albert Finney 23) William Hurt 24) George Clooney 25) Bruno Ganz

26) Michael Caine 27) Michael Douglas 28) Kevin Costner 29) Ben Kingsley 30) Tom Cruise

31) Isabelle Huppert 32) Nicole Kidman 33) Mia Farrow 34) Jane Fonda 35) Daniel Auteuil

36) Ellen Burstyn 37) Ralph Fiennes 38) Bob Hoskins 39) Tommy Lee Jones 40) Judy Davis

41) Dennis Hopper 42) Kevin Kline 43) Alan Bates 44) Emmanuelle Beart 45) Maggie Cheung

46) Matt Dillon 47) Richard Gere 48) Jeremy Irons 49) Faye Dunaway 50) Juliette Binoche

51) Matthew Broderick 52) Isabelle Adjani 53) Glenn Close 54) Anjelica Huston 55) Russell Crowe

56) John Hurt 57) Leonardo DiCaprio 58) Leslie Caron 59) Holly Hunter 60) Albert Brooks

61) Ethan Hawke 62) Peter Fonda 63) Jodie Foster 64) Samuel L Jackson 65) Jim Carrey

66) Jackie Chan 67) Ian Holm 68) Sandrine Bonnaire 69) Willem Dafoe 70) Antonio Banderas

71) Catherine Keener 72) Morgan Freeman 73) Gabriel Byrne 74) James Caan 75) Keith Carradine

76) Helena Bonham Carter 77) Val Kilmer 78) Julie Andrews 79) James Garner 80) Lauren Bacall

81) Kevin Bacon 82) Elliott Gould 83) Bruce Dern 84) Colin Firth 85) Anne Bancroft

86) Ed Harris 87) Michael Keaton 88) Cameron DIaz 89) Michel Bouquet 90) Kirsten Dunst

91) Hugh Grant 92) Alan Arkin 93) Jacqueline Bissett 94) Woody Harrelson 95) Anouk Aimee

96) John Goodman 97) Steve Buscemi 98) Giancarlo Giannini 99) Matt Damon 100) Angela Bassett

Forrest

  • Guest
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #239 on: May 24, 2009, 10:20:22 PM »
I had forgotten what a hero Byrd was 

Really? Does his opposition to authorize the war really make him a hero? Who amongst us could have the past that he had and still have a second life as as someone speaking truth to power?