Author Topic: Beatles remasters  (Read 12602 times)

ian

  • Achilles bursitis
  • Posts: 216
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #30 on: September 06, 2009, 01:39:19 AM »
abbey road second side is my single favorite side they ever made

Matt C

  • Policemans heel
  • Posts: 85
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #31 on: September 06, 2009, 08:25:56 AM »
I'm into listening in on the sessions.  It's crazy that, like a fly on a wall, I can listen to all of the starts and stops and changes of songs, discussions, jokes, arguments, all of it.  I mean, someone has managed to find and upload every second of the Abbey Road sessions - like 20 hours or something. 

Wow, where did you get that?

nec13

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2397
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #32 on: September 06, 2009, 11:37:06 AM »
I'm not sure. Purple Chick put out a 12-disc bootleg version of The White Album with studio chatter, outtakes, etc. that's really worth listening to. He/she might have done the same for Abbey Road.
Nobody ever lends money to a man with a sense of humor.

fletcher munson

  • Tarsel tunnel syndrome
  • Posts: 490
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #33 on: September 06, 2009, 02:27:13 PM »
I'm not sure. Purple Chick put out a 12-disc bootleg version of The White Album with studio chatter, outtakes, etc. that's really worth listening to. He/she might have done the same for Abbey Road.
Yeah, purple chick looks like a good one.  Session mp3s are everywhere.  I had a different one, but I'd have to search for it. 
veni dixie vici

snogrog

  • Tarsel tunnel syndrome
  • Posts: 406
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #34 on: September 06, 2009, 03:32:36 PM »
I actually like the Abbey Road medley.  I've found that to be rare among fans.

I sorta got "Beatlesed out" in high school because I listened to them so much.  But I still enjoy hearing them pop up on the iPod.


I love the Abbey Road medley. Possibly it's my ADHD, but I can listen to Revolution #9 all the way through, too.

The Abbey Road medley is my favorite thing the Beatles have done. Seriously, I never tire of it and cannot WAIT to play/sing it in Beatles Rock Band.
He's this soulless bastard from Siberia. I once saw him shove Fred Savage's face in a toilet.

nec13

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2397
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #35 on: September 06, 2009, 09:28:18 PM »
abbey road second side is my single favorite side they ever made

Mine would be side three of The White Album. Or side two of Please Please Me.
Nobody ever lends money to a man with a sense of humor.

Gilly

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2110
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #36 on: September 08, 2009, 07:45:16 PM »
From what I've heard, the mono box is excellent. It beats the original Cd's by a landslide, and the Ebbetts mono release by a quite a bit as well.

yesno

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3426
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #37 on: September 08, 2009, 07:55:08 PM »
These leaked a while ago, and I've listened to lossless versions of the stereo and mono boxes as well as V0 rips.  I'm not going to pretend to be an audiophile  They all sound about the same as the Beatles CDs I bought used years ago.  They sound a little better, but not hundreds of dollars better.

I guess I'm more of a quantity guy with music.  I'd rather buy some stuff I've never heard from the 1960s than the same albums over again.


Gilly

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2110
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #38 on: September 08, 2009, 08:05:17 PM »
These leaked a while ago, and I've listened to lossless versions of the stereo and mono boxes as well as V0 rips.  I'm not going to pretend to be an audiophile  They all sound about the same as the Beatles CDs I bought used years ago.  They sound a little better, but not hundreds of dollars better.

I guess I'm more of a quantity guy with music.  I'd rather buy some stuff I've never heard from the 1960s than the same albums over again.



I usually am about quantity too and loading up on things I haven't heard about, but not with the Beatles. I'm pretty obsessive about their catalog. This remaster is easily the best I've heard... one day I'll be able to afford the original UK mono pressings or who knows, maybe even the Japanese red wax (yeah right) and I can compare flac to cd to mp3 to vinyl, but to my ear, these mono remasters in lossless quality are easily the best I've heard. I'll definitely purchase it when I can.

Gilly

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2110
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #39 on: September 08, 2009, 11:45:04 PM »
I won't break down the exact issues because I think that these new remasters are probably the best but here's what I prefer when it comes to mono/stereo for each album:

Please Please Me: I've been mono on this one, but the songs I've heard from the new stereo master are really well done. But, I think mono is probably still the best because a lot of times you still get the voice separation.

With the Beatles: Not even close. Mono.

A Hard Days Night: Another easy choice for mono.

Beatles For Sale: I prefer the stereo on this one. The voices aren't as separated as other albums and mono mix lacks the fullness of the other mono releases.

Help!: Very close, but I like the stereo release. I like the vocals a little more in mono even though the stereo doesn't suffer from separation, but the instruments really shine on the stereo mix.

Rubber Soul: After two solid stereo albums, Rubber Soul takes two steps backwards in the stereo department which isn't surprising since this is the album that the Beatles started doing some studio experimentation creating a challenge to create a stereo mix on only four tracks.. But oh that mono mix is so, so good. If the whole world only heard this in mono it might just be considered the Beatles masterpiece.

Revolver: Still experimenting with moving things around in 2 channels and still failing miserably. Mono by a landslide.

Sgt. Peppers: If Rubber Soul took two step backwards, Sgt. Peppers took two more. Voices, handclaps, instruments seem randomly placed in one channel and it's especially annoying to listen to on headphones. Like Lennon said, you haven't heard Sgt. Peppers until you've heard it in mono.

Magical Mystery Tour: While not perfect, you can tell that they are almost there on getting stereo to work well with complex studio production. I could go either way here... some songs sound better in mono, some in stereo but if I was listening to the whole thing I think I'd choose stereo.

White Album: A lot of people think that the mono release was actually a fold down to please mono enthusiasts. Either way, mono is for collectors only because of the different mixes, the White Album finally gets stereo right and of course becomes the last album the Beatles release in both formats.


DanFromBrooklyn

  • Achilles bursitis
  • Posts: 111
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #40 on: September 09, 2009, 08:47:20 AM »
Hey all,

FYI Amazon just released more Mono boxes for sale.  I ordered mine...I suggest acting fast if you're interested!

Dan

Matt

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 1021
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #41 on: September 09, 2009, 09:44:12 AM »
Hey all,

FYI Amazon just released more Mono boxes for sale.  I ordered mine...I suggest acting fast if you're interested!

Dan

I got mine too! Git on it while the gittin's good!
It ain't ego, it's my love for you.

yesno

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3426
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #42 on: September 09, 2009, 10:26:33 AM »
I just read that the main reason iTunes and Amazon MP3 etc don't have any Beatles songs is to avoid cannibalizing box set sales, and also that this box set is basically seen as the last hurrah for CDs.  Pretty good way to go out.

yesno

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3426
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #43 on: September 09, 2009, 11:41:22 AM »
Chuck Klosterman is one of those "college" writers that I avoid, but this is pretty funny--

http://www.avclub.com/articles/chuck-klosterman-repeats-the-beatles,32560/

jbissell

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 1807
Re: Beatles remasters
« Reply #44 on: September 09, 2009, 01:13:15 PM »
Chuck Klosterman is one of those "college" writers that I avoid, but this is pretty funny--

http://www.avclub.com/articles/chuck-klosterman-repeats-the-beatles,32560/


75% of the articles I've read about the remasters use the same "some obscure 60's band" joke.