Author Topic: LOST season 6  (Read 32337 times)

TacoSmith

  • Tarsel tunnel syndrome
  • Posts: 299
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #210 on: May 24, 2010, 07:29:05 PM »
Y'all are some str8 up haterz. I loved it.
"Straight-up, helicopters are beyond fresh."

dave from knoxville

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 5108
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #211 on: May 24, 2010, 08:57:52 PM »
Y'all are some str8 up haterz. I loved it.

I am with you.

erika

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2412
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #212 on: May 24, 2010, 09:14:10 PM »
It was the goddamn dog that did it to me. I can't stop thinking about Vincent laying down next to Jack. I am SO easy.
from the land of pleasant living

masterofsparks

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3323
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #213 on: May 24, 2010, 09:56:01 PM »
It was the goddamn dog that did it to me. I can't stop thinking about Vincent laying down next to Jack. I am SO easy.

That kinda got me a little bit.

My main problem with the episode, and increasingly with the show, is the writers insisting, once it became obvious that they were not going to be able to answer a lot of the mysteries they'd set up, that this is "a character-based show, not a mystery-based show." That's a fine sentiment, but unfortunately creating a character-based show means creating memorable characters and, hopefully, having great actors portray them. In my opinion, Lost did neither (there were rare but noteworthy exceptions). I was much more interested in the mystery and mythology and geek stuff, but I guess that makes for less broad appeal (certainly less than love triangles and the like).
I'll probably go into the wee hours.

wwwes

  • Tarsel tunnel syndrome
  • Posts: 309
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #214 on: May 24, 2010, 10:02:12 PM »
I feel like they chickened out of what would have been the really bold move, just acknowledging within the show that nobody has any clue what is going on.

Trotskie

  • Tarsel tunnel syndrome
  • Posts: 314
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #215 on: May 24, 2010, 10:14:15 PM »
However they got there, I thought that the image of fading Jack and Vincent was a great way for the island narrative to go out.


And enough with those two, Lindelof and Cuse.  Take five guys.

Trembling Eagle

  • Guest
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #216 on: May 25, 2010, 04:14:10 AM »
that purgatory shit didn't make sense

why would they be sharing purgatories

Why does he have a fake kid in the puragtory? What happens to the fake kid once he moves on? How about Sun and Jins baby? Why is Penny there? Why is Aaron still a baby?

 If he has a fake kid in the purgatory then everybody I assume apart from Jack wasn't really there. If thats true, then no point in the Kate, Sun & Jin, Sawyer stories in purgatory flashes this season.

Failed season 6.


Whatever, I'm done with network tv anyway. Even the very best of it is fucking retarded.

Sarah

  • Guest
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #217 on: May 25, 2010, 06:54:24 AM »
Having slept on this weighty matter, I have decided that Lost's makers were very smart to end it as they did.  There was no way they could resolve all of the pseudoscientific mysteries satisfactorily, and neither was the mythology they had created cohesive enough to be wrapped up tidily, so they opted for sentimentality.  They gave the viewers a bunch of happy endings, which probably left more people with a better taste in their mouths than a lot of half-assed explanation would have done.  I mostly find that when mysteries are explained, there's a letdown, sort of like the slump during those hours after the presents have been opened on Christmas morning.  Even if Cuse and Lindelof had been able to check all the boxes by all the unanswered questions--and I don't think they could have, because they themselves had no idea what boxes to check--some people might have felt the fussy glow one gets after completing a task but that comfort would have been cold compared to all the easy emotions evoked by all the soppiness.  Where Cuse and Lindelof screwed up, I think, is promising--or at least implying--that everything would be tied up with a neat bow.  That is what has caused so many people to feel a little bit as though they've been duped.

But, hey, it was only a TV show. 

Rhea from Winnipeg

  • Plantar Fasciitis
  • Posts: 26
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #218 on: May 25, 2010, 07:37:04 AM »
I'm going to miss it, but at least it ended when it did, instead of beating a dead horse (think The X-Files)
Où sont mes pantalons ?

fonpr

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 4099
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #219 on: May 25, 2010, 08:28:09 AM »

Whatever, I'm done with network tv anyway.

Hear here.
"Like it or not, Florida seems dedicated to a 'live fast, die' way of doing things."

JonFromMaplewood

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2372
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #220 on: May 25, 2010, 10:19:14 AM »
I was quite happy with the ending on the island, and I sincerely feel that that ending can be understood completely devoid of the altaverse.  But the altaverse - yechhh - it seemed like just an excuse to have everyone together on stage at the end like the end of an episode of SNL....awkward hugging included.

I do not think anyone can convince me that the altaverse made any sense at all, even by its own internal logic.

And I agree 100%, Sarah, that checking off all of the mysteries would have been a fatal mistake (As the writers themselves point out, George Lucas chose to explain the Force with midichlorians, and look how satisfying that was).  I am more than happy that the writers left us wondering about the nature of "the light." That deserves to be mysterious forever.  But there were a few mysteries that took up so much time on the screen that ignoring them seemed a little odd.  Why did the island cure some people of cancer but not others?  Why could no babies be born on the island, but then some could?  The button in the hatch? C'mon. At least give us that. 

 
"I'm riding the silence like John Cage up in this piece." -Tom Scharpling

orator

  • Tarsel tunnel syndrome
  • Posts: 417
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #221 on: May 25, 2010, 03:27:48 PM »
And I agree 100%, Sarah, that checking off all of the mysteries would have been a fatal mistake (As the writers themselves point out, George Lucas chose to explain the Force with midichlorians, and look how satisfying that was).  I am more than happy that the writers left us wondering about the nature of "the light." That deserves to be mysterious forever.  But there were a few mysteries that took up so much time on the screen that ignoring them seemed a little odd.  Why did the island cure some people of cancer but not others?  Why could no babies be born on the island, but then some could?  The button in the hatch? C'mon. At least give us that. 

What Lucas did was a mistake because it was pretty much the only mysterious thing in his story and I don't think many people cared about an answer in the first place. The problem with Lost and its writers are they introduced mystery upon mystery upon mystery for about 6 seasons of TV, no doubt solely for the cool commercial breaks and episode/season cliffhangers. They went on to have the characters ask what was going on a million times in the show only to be evaded with some of the dumbest and most infuriatingly cryptic dialogue from the characters in the know (who end up not being in the know, because the writers themselves were never in the know).

They dug a giant pit of mystery and there was no way to get out of it. They say it's a show about characters and not about the mysteries, which would be fine if the mystery elements didn't get as much or more screen time. The solution? Don't write so much weird shit.

When I look at the show as a whole I hate it, I loath its writing style, but it ended about as good as it could have.
"Come partake of my fruit baskets."

Sarah

  • Guest
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #222 on: May 25, 2010, 03:46:03 PM »
When I first started watching the show, two things hooked me:  the scenery was nice, and it was on every day (I was watching it on G4).  I disliked almost all the characters and thought a lot of the mystery stuff was entertaining enough but silly.  It was just like a soap opera, in other words.  When I started watching the show weekly (beginning in season 5), I enjoyed the show far less, in part because I preferred the daily fix but also because so much action took place off the island.  Season 6 I found especially dumb.  But, again, what the hell.  The show whiled away many hours reasonably pleasantly.  That's not bad.

In honor of the passing of Lost, this afternoon I'm watching the series finale of 24, even though I gave this season a miss.  I want to see whether Jack gets his well-earned rest alive or dead.

Reeleyes

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 609
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #223 on: May 25, 2010, 04:55:15 PM »
I just wanted to know what was up with Walt. He was the big mystery in the first 2 seasons. He was special, the others wanted him, he was the key to something. I know the actor grew up but in the final timeline of the island was 3 years after the original Oceanic crash so there was no reason that they couldn't throw him into the last season mix. I wouldn't care so much if they didn't make it such a big deal early on. The finale would have been better as a reunion episode.
You look like a really healthy Arthy Lang.

thom

  • Achilles bursitis
  • Posts: 238
Re: LOST season 6
« Reply #224 on: May 25, 2010, 08:36:50 PM »
I think the most noteworthy thing about Lost is the desire for "answers" to the mysterious bits and bobs.
There aren't many other sci-fi shows that have viewers grasping for conclusive resolutions to its narrative props and devices that are obviously supernatural.

For example, in that pirate movie, there's a compass that points to what its user desires most.
If that compass were in Lost, everyone would be like... Who made that compass? How does it work?

Sawyer finds a ring with weird writing on it. He puts it on, and he turns invisible.
Who made that ring? How does it work? Can anyone translate that inscription? Does anyone have an HD screencap of it? How many carats?


˙ɔıƃɐɯ :uoıʇnlos