FOT Forum
FOT Community => General Discussion => Topic started by: Julie on September 22, 2008, 02:05:59 PM
-
nothing
-
laziness.
-
hosting a radio show
-
I'd be better at writing for Jay Leno than Tom
I also put this down for "I Can Do That". But I feel it is applicable here too, because the writing for Jay Leno isn't funny and I would be better at writing material that isn't funny than Tom.
See? Did you read that sentence?
It was awful, it barely made sense. Therefore, in summary, I would be better at writing for Jay Leno than Tom.
-
ballet (this is just a guess).
-
eating meat
-
curling
-
hosting a radio show
How many new regimes exactly do you want to force on us all? Send up the rabble-rouser flag!
I don't know if I'd be better at it, but I'd be willing to face Tom in air hockey at a professional level.
-
hosting a radio show
How many new regimes exactly do you want to force on us all? Send up the rabble-rouser flag!
I don't know if I'd be better at it, but I'd be willing to face Tom in air hockey at a professional level.
Teehee.
I'd say "drummer," but Tom laid down some pretty mean beat-boxing during the Purple Haze call from Mac.
-
golf
-
golf
Eventually, every thread in General discussion will be about golf.
-
Naming all of the X-Men, in order of the issue they joined.
-
Baseball trivia and maybe... just maybe basketball trivia. I don't know pre-80's basketball as well as I know baseball.
-
I've put some thought into this, and based on what little I know about the guy through the Best Show, I could:
- Outdrink him. Not braggin', just puttin' it out there.
- Out-polite him. His door-holding ettiquite seems pretty solid based on the last show, but I think I'd win here, if it was a door-holding contest. I think more people - if they had doors held by both of us - would say they preferred my technique. But I'm talking strictly non-professional door-holding. I wouldn't be a better doorman because he'd probably hail taxis better and I don't wear hats.
- Better destroy a Terminator. T-800, not T-1000.
-
Table-tennis.
-
TAP DANCING!!!
-
air hockey
-
being a genetic female
-
cribbage
9-ball
-
Eating red meat!!
-
Solving Bernoulli equations
-
writing SQL queries
-
picking films for Jillian Barberie and I to go and see
-
Solving Bernoulli equations
I would like to see Tom challenge this, and then there be a showdown.
-
baseball trivia.
-
Pie-eating.
-
Being a snob.
-
cooking. i feel confident about that one, but this is just a guess: jenga.
-
Solving Bernoulli equations
what is a bernoulli equation? Like the binomial distribution or is it more like a bessel function or what? Will you put it here?
-
Cricket. Which most would file under 'bothered'.
-
Golf, natch.
-
Solving Bernoulli equations
what is a bernoulli equation? Like the binomial distribution or is it more like a bessel function or what? Will you put it here?
For example, y prime minus y equals e to the x times y squared. Dividing each term by y squared produces the equation y to the negative two times y prime minus y to the negative one equals e to the x. In this form of the equation, we can let v equal y to the negative one, which implies that v prime equals negative y to the negative two times y prime. Shifting the negative in this expression to the left side of the equation gives negative v prime equals positive y to the negative two power times y prime. Now we can substitute these expressions for y to the negative one power and y to the negative two power times y prime into the transformed equation y to the negative two times y prime minus y to the negative one equals e to the x, producing the simpler negative v prime minus v equals e to the x. But this is a first order linear equation. Multiplying each term by negative one converts this equation to standard form v prime plus v equals negative e to the x. This type of first order linear differential equation is typically solved with a simple integrating factor of the form u of x equals e to the integral of p of x dx where p of x is the coefficient of the dependent variable, which, in this case, is just the constant one. So the integrating factor is simply e to the x. Multiplying this expression into each side of the current form of the differential equation produces e to the x times v prime plus e to the x times v equals negative e to the two x. According to standard procedure, the sum on the left side of this equation represents the derivative with respect to x of the product e to the x times v. Integrating each side of the equation with respect to x produces an equation that is free of all derivatives. That equation is e to the x times v equals c minus one half of e to the two x, where c is an arbitrary constant. Replacing v with one over y, e to the x over y equals c minus one half of e to the two x. Multiplying y to the right of the equation, dividing c minus one half of e to the two x to the left, and doubling the denominator and numerator so as to resolve the resulting complex fraction produces y equals two times e to the x divided by ( c minus e to the two x).
Let me know if you find a mistake in this.
-
My brain is bleeding.
-
Solving Bernoulli Bore-noulli equations
what is a bernoulli equation? Like the binomial distribution or is it more like a bessel function or what? Will you put it here?
For example, y prime minus y equals e to the x times y squared. Dividing each term by y squared produces the equation y to the negative two times y prime minus y to the negative one equals e to the x. In this form of the equation, we can let v equal y to the negative one, which implies that v prime equals negative y to the negative two times y prime. Shifting the negative in this expression to the left side of the equation gives negative v prime equals positive y to the negative two power times y prime. Now we can substitute these expressions for y to the negative one power and y to the negative two power times y prime into the transformed equation y to the negative two times y prime minus y to the negative one equals e to the x, producing the simpler negative v prime minus v equals e to the x. But this is a first order linear equation. Multiplying each term by negative one converts this equation to standard form v prime plus v equals negative e to the x. This type of first order linear differential equation is typically solved with a simple integrating factor of the form u of x equals e to the integral of p of x dx where p of x is the coefficient of the dependent variable, which, in this case, is just the constant one. So the integrating factor is simply e to the x. Multiplying this expression into each side of the current form of the differential equation produces e to the x times v prime plus e to the x times v equals negative e to the two x. According to standard procedure, the sum on the left side of this equation represents the derivative with respect to x of the product e to the x times v. Integrating each side of the equation with respect to x produces an equation that is free of all derivatives. That equation is e to the x times v equals c minus one half of e to the two x, where c is an arbitrary constant. Replacing v with one over y, e to the x over y equals c minus one half of e to the two x. Multiplying y to the right of the equation, dividing c minus one half of e to the two x to the left, and doubling the denominator and numerator so as to resolve the resulting complex fraction produces y equals two times e to the x divided by ( c minus e to the two x).
Let me know if you find a mistake in this.
Fixed!
-
Solving Bernoulli Bore-noulli equations
what is a bernoulli equation? Like the binomial distribution or is it more like a bessel function or what? Will you put it here?
For example, y prime minus y equals e to the x times y squared. Dividing each term by y squared produces the equation y to the negative two times y prime minus y to the negative one equals e to the x. In this form of the equation, we can let v equal y to the negative one, which implies that v prime equals negative y to the negative two times y prime. Shifting the negative in this expression to the left side of the equation gives negative v prime equals positive y to the negative two power times y prime. Now we can substitute these expressions for y to the negative one power and y to the negative two power times y prime into the transformed equation y to the negative two times y prime minus y to the negative one equals e to the x, producing the simpler negative v prime minus v equals e to the x. But this is a first order linear equation. Multiplying each term by negative one converts this equation to standard form v prime plus v equals negative e to the x. This type of first order linear differential equation is typically solved with a simple integrating factor of the form u of x equals e to the integral of p of x dx where p of x is the coefficient of the dependent variable, which, in this case, is just the constant one. So the integrating factor is simply e to the x. Multiplying this expression into each side of the current form of the differential equation produces e to the x times v prime plus e to the x times v equals negative e to the two x. According to standard procedure, the sum on the left side of this equation represents the derivative with respect to x of the product e to the x times v. Integrating each side of the equation with respect to x produces an equation that is free of all derivatives. That equation is e to the x times v equals c minus one half of e to the two x, where c is an arbitrary constant. Replacing v with one over y, e to the x over y equals c minus one half of e to the two x. Multiplying y to the right of the equation, dividing c minus one half of e to the two x to the left, and doubling the denominator and numerator so as to resolve the resulting complex fraction produces y equals two times e to the x divided by ( c minus e to the two x).
Let me know if you find a mistake in this.
Fixed!
I did just work out the confirmation, if you want me to type it up, but it's a little more involved than the solution, so I would need some advance warning...
-
Solving Bernoulli equations
what is a bernoulli equation? Like the binomial distribution or is it more like a bessel function or what? Will you put it here?
For example, y prime minus y equals e to the x times y squared. Dividing each term by y squared produces the equation y to the negative two times y prime minus y to the negative one equals e to the x. In this form of the equation, we can let v equal y to the negative one, which implies that v prime equals negative y to the negative two times y prime. Shifting the negative in this expression to the left side of the equation gives negative v prime equals positive y to the negative two power times y prime. Now we can substitute these expressions for y to the negative one power and y to the negative two power times y prime into the transformed equation y to the negative two times y prime minus y to the negative one equals e to the x, producing the simpler negative v prime minus v equals e to the x. But this is a first order linear equation. Multiplying each term by negative one converts this equation to standard form v prime plus v equals negative e to the x. This type of first order linear differential equation is typically solved with a simple integrating factor of the form u of x equals e to the integral of p of x dx where p of x is the coefficient of the dependent variable, which, in this case, is just the constant one. So the integrating factor is simply e to the x. Multiplying this expression into each side of the current form of the differential equation produces e to the x times v prime plus e to the x times v equals negative e to the two x. According to standard procedure, the sum on the left side of this equation represents the derivative with respect to x of the product e to the x times v. Integrating each side of the equation with respect to x produces an equation that is free of all derivatives. That equation is e to the x times v equals c minus one half of e to the two x, where c is an arbitrary constant. Replacing v with one over y, e to the x over y equals c minus one half of e to the two x. Multiplying y to the right of the equation, dividing c minus one half of e to the two x to the left, and doubling the denominator and numerator so as to resolve the resulting complex fraction produces y equals two times e to the x divided by ( c minus e to the two x).
Let me know if you find a mistake in this.
I do not know this, so I will not find a mistake. But instead of providing a proof in english word, could you just, as a very special favor, put the equations?
y=(2ex)/(c-e2x)
because my main problem is word understanding. But I certainly understand the symbols and such.
-
here you go
t Xa Ya Xb Yb D
223 1091.61016 958.000699 1091.110334 957.9436095 0.503075033
1 4.9 1756.4 204 4.3 1763.376086
2 9.8 1752.8 208 8.6 1755.424986
3 14.7 1749.2 212 12.9 1747.473885
4 19.6 1745.6 216 17.2 1739.522785
5 24.5 1742 220 21.5 1731.571685
6 29.4 1738.4 224 25.8 1723.620585
7 34.3 1734.8 228 30.1 1715.669484
8 39.2 1731.2 232 34.4 1707.718384
9 44.1 1727.6 236 38.7 1699.767284
10 49 1724 240 43 1691.816184
11 53.9 1720.4 244 47.3 1683.865084
12 58.8 1716.8 248 51.6 1675.913983
13 63.7 1713.2 252 55.9 1667.962883
14 68.6 1709.6 256 60.2 1660.011783
15 73.5 1706 260 64.5 1652.060683
16 78.4 1702.4 264 68.8 1644.109583
17 83.3 1698.8 268 73.1 1636.158483
18 88.2 1695.2 272 77.4 1628.207382
19 93.1 1691.6 276 81.7 1620.256282
20 98 1688 280 86 1612.305182
21 102.9 1684.4 284 90.3 1604.354082
22 107.8 1680.8 288 94.6 1596.402982
23 112.7 1677.2 292 98.9 1588.451882
24 117.6 1673.6 296 103.2 1580.500781
25 122.5 1670 300 107.5 1572.549681
26 127.4 1666.4 304 111.8 1564.598581
27 132.3 1662.8 308 116.1 1556.647481
28 137.2 1659.2 312 120.4 1548.696381
29 142.1 1655.6 316 124.7 1540.745281
30 147 1652 320 129 1532.794181
31 151.9 1648.4 324 133.3 1524.84308
32 156.8 1644.8 328 137.6 1516.89198
33 161.7 1641.2 332 141.9 1508.94088
34 166.6 1637.6 336 146.2 1500.98978
35 171.5 1634 340 150.5 1493.03868
36 176.4 1630.4 344 154.8 1485.08758
37 181.3 1626.8 348 159.1 1477.13648
38 186.2 1623.2 352 163.4 1469.18538
39 191.1 1619.6 356 167.7 1461.23428
40 196 1616 360 172 1453.28318
41 200.9 1612.4 364 176.3 1445.332079
42 205.8 1608.8 368 180.6 1437.380979
43 210.7 1605.2 372 184.9 1429.429879
44 215.6 1601.6 376 189.2 1421.478779
45 220.5 1598 380 193.5 1413.527679
46 225.4 1594.4 384 197.8 1405.576579
47 230.3 1590.8 388 202.1 1397.625479
48 235.2 1587.2 392 206.4 1389.674379
49 240.1 1583.6 396 210.7 1381.723279
50 245 1580 400 215 1373.772179
51 249.9 1576.4 404 219.3 1365.821079
52 254.8 1572.8 408 223.6 1357.869979
53 259.7 1569.2 412 227.9 1349.918879
54 264.6 1565.6 416 232.2 1341.967779
55 269.5 1562 420 236.5 1334.016679
56 274.4 1558.4 424 240.8 1326.065579
57 279.3 1554.8 428 245.1 1318.114479
58 284.2 1551.2 432 249.4 1310.163379
59 289.1 1547.6 436 253.7 1302.212279
60 294 1544 440 258 1294.261179
61 298.9 1540.4 444 262.3 1286.310079
62 303.8 1536.8 448 266.6 1278.358979
63 308.7 1533.2 452 270.9 1270.407879
64 313.6 1529.6 456 275.2 1262.456779
65 318.5 1526 460 279.5 1254.50568
66 323.4 1522.4 464 283.8 1246.55458
67 328.3 1518.8 468 288.1 1238.60348
68 333.2 1515.2 472 292.4 1230.65238
69 338.1 1511.6 476 296.7 1222.70128
70 343 1508 480 301 1214.75018
71 347.9 1504.4 484 305.3 1206.79908
72 352.8 1500.8 488 309.6 1198.84798
73 357.7 1497.2 492 313.9 1190.896881
74 362.6 1493.6 496 318.2 1182.945781
75 367.5 1490 500 322.5 1174.994681
76 372.4 1486.4 504 326.8 1167.043581
77 377.3 1482.8 508 331.1 1159.092481
78 382.2 1479.2 512 335.4 1151.141381
79 387.1 1475.6 516 339.7 1143.190282
80 392 1472 520 344 1135.239182
81 396.9 1468.4 524 348.3 1127.288082
82 401.8 1464.8 528 352.6 1119.336982
83 406.7 1461.2 532 356.9 1111.385883
84 411.6 1457.6 536 361.2 1103.434783
85 416.5 1454 540 365.5 1095.483683
86 421.4 1450.4 544 369.8 1087.532583
87 426.3 1446.8 548 374.1 1079.581484
88 431.2 1443.2 552 378.4 1071.630384
89 436.1 1439.6 556 382.7 1063.679284
90 441 1436 560 387 1055.728185
91 445.9 1432.4 564 391.3 1047.777085
92 450.8 1428.8 568 395.6 1039.825985
93 455.7 1425.2 572 399.9 1031.874886
94 460.6 1421.6 576 404.2 1023.923786
95 465.5 1418 580 408.5 1015.972687
96 470.4 1414.4 584 412.8 1008.021587
97 475.3 1410.8 588 417.1 1000.070488
98 480.2 1407.2 592 421.4 992.119388
99 485.1 1403.6 596 425.7 984.1682885
100 490 1400 600 430 976.2171889
101 494.9 1396.4 604 434.3 968.2660895
102 499.8 1392.8 608 438.6 960.31499
103 504.7 1389.2 612 442.9 952.3638905
104 509.6 1385.6 616 447.2 944.4127911
105 514.5 1382 620 451.5 936.4616917
106 519.4 1378.4 624 455.8 928.5105923
107 524.3 1374.8 628 460.1 920.5594929
108 529.2 1371.2 632 464.4 912.6083936
109 534.1 1367.6 636 468.7 904.6572942
110 539 1364 640 473 896.7061949
111 543.9 1360.4 644 477.3 888.7550956
112 548.8 1356.8 648 481.6 880.8039964
113 553.7 1353.2 652 485.9 872.8528971
114 558.6 1349.6 656 490.2 864.9017979
115 563.5 1346 660 494.5 856.9506987
116 568.4 1342.4 664 498.8 848.9995995
117 573.3 1338.8 668 503.1 841.0485004
118 578.2 1335.2 672 507.4 833.0974013
119 583.1 1331.6 676 511.7 825.1463022
120 588 1328 680 516 817.1952031
121 592.9 1324.4 684 520.3 809.2441041
122 597.8 1320.8 688 524.6 801.2930051
123 602.7 1317.2 692 528.9 793.3419061
124 607.6 1313.6 696 533.2 785.3908072
125 612.5 1310 700 537.5 777.4397083
126 617.4 1306.4 704 541.8 769.4886094
127 622.3 1302.8 708 546.1 761.5375106
128 627.2 1299.2 712 550.4 753.5864118
129 632.1 1295.6 716 554.7 745.635313
130 637 1292 720 559 737.6842143
131 641.9 1288.4 724 563.3 729.7331156
132 646.8 1284.8 728 567.6 721.782017
133 651.7 1281.2 732 571.9 713.8309184
134 656.6 1277.6 736 576.2 705.8798198
135 661.5 1274 740 580.5 697.9287213
136 666.4 1270.4 744 584.8 689.9776228
137 671.3 1266.8 748 589.1 682.0265244
138 676.2 1263.2 752 593.4 674.075426
139 681.1 1259.6 756 597.7 666.1243277
140 686 1256 760 602 658.1732295
141 690.9 1252.4 764 606.3 650.2221313
142 695.8 1248.8 768 610.6 642.2710331
143 700.7 1245.2 772 614.9 634.319935
144 705.6 1241.6 776 619.2 626.368837
145 710.5 1238 780 623.5 618.4177391
146 715.4 1234.4 784 627.8 610.4666412
147 720.3 1230.8 788 632.1 602.5155434
148 725.2 1227.2 792 636.4 594.5644456
149 730.1 1223.6 796 640.7 586.613348
150 735 1220 800 645 578.6622504
151 739.9 1216.4 804 649.3 570.7111529
152 744.8 1212.8 808 653.6 562.7600554
153 749.7 1209.2 812 657.9 554.8089581
154 754.6 1205.6 816 662.2 546.8578609
155 759.5 1202 820 666.5 538.9067637
156 764.4 1198.4 824 670.8 530.9556667
157 769.3 1194.8 828 675.1 523.0045698
158 774.2 1191.2 832 679.4 515.053473
159 779.1 1187.6 836 683.7 507.1023763
160 784 1184 840 688 499.1512797
161 788.9 1180.4 844 692.3 491.2001832
162 793.8 1176.8 848 696.6 483.2490869
163 798.7 1173.2 852 700.9 475.2979907
164 803.6 1169.6 856 705.2 467.3468947
165 808.5 1166 860 709.5 459.3957988
166 813.4 1162.4 864 713.8 451.4447031
167 818.3 1158.8 868 718.1 443.4936076
168 823.2 1155.2 872 722.4 435.5425123
169 828.1 1151.6 876 726.7 427.5914171
170 833 1148 880 731 419.6403222
171 837.9 1144.4 884 735.3 411.6892275
172 842.8 1140.8 888 739.6 403.738133
173 847.7 1137.2 892 743.9 395.7870387
174 852.6 1133.6 896 748.2 387.8359447
175 857.5 1130 900 752.5 379.884851
176 862.4 1126.4 904 756.8 371.9337575
177 867.3 1122.8 908 761.1 363.9826644
178 872.2 1119.2 912 765.4 356.0315716
179 877.1 1115.6 916 769.7 348.0804792
180 882 1112 920 774 340.1293871
181 886.9 1108.4 924 778.3 332.1782955
182 891.8 1104.8 928 782.6 324.2272043
183 896.7 1101.2 932 786.9 316.2761135
184 901.6 1097.6 936 791.2 308.3250233
185 906.5 1094 940 795.5 300.3739336
186 911.4 1090.4 944 799.8 292.4228445
187 916.3 1086.8 948 804.1 284.4717561
188 921.2 1083.2 952 808.4 276.5206683
189 926.1 1079.6 956 812.7 268.5695813
190 931 1076 960 817 260.6184951
191 935.9 1072.4 964 821.3 252.6674098
192 940.8 1068.8 968 825.6 244.7163256
193 945.7 1065.2 972 829.9 236.7652424
194 950.6 1061.6 976 834.2 228.8141604
195 955.5 1058 980 838.5 220.8630798
196 960.4 1054.4 984 842.8 212.9120006
197 965.3 1050.8 988 847.1 204.9609231
198 970.2 1047.2 992 851.4 197.0098475
199 975.1 1043.6 996 855.7 189.0587739
200 980 1040 1000 860 181.1077028
201 984.9 1036.4 1004 864.3 173.1566343
202 989.8 1032.8 1008 868.6 165.2055689
203 994.7 1029.2 1012 872.9 157.2545071
204 999.6 1025.6 1016 877.2 149.3034494
205 1004.5 1022 1020 881.5 141.3523965
206 1009.4 1018.4 1024 885.8 133.4013493
207 1014.3 1014.8 1028 890.1 125.4503089
208 1019.2 1011.2 1032 894.4 117.4992766
209 1024.1 1007.6 1036 898.7 109.5482542
210 1029 1004 1040 903 101.5972441
211 1033.9 1000.4 1044 907.3 93.64624926
212 1038.8 996.8 1048 911.6 85.69527408
213 1043.7 993.2 1052 915.9 77.74432455
214 1048.6 989.6 1056 920.2 69.79340943
215 1053.5 986 1060 924.5 61.84254199
216 1058.4 982.4 1064 928.8 53.89174334
217 1063.3 978.8 1068 933.1 45.94104918
218 1068.2 975.2 1072 937.4 37.99052513
219 1073.1 971.6 1076 941.7 30.04030626
220 1078 968 1080 946 22.09072203
221 1082.9 964.4 1084 950.3 14.14284271
222 1087.8 960.8 1088 954.6 6.203224968
223 1092.7 957.2 1092 958.9 1.838477631
224 1097.6 953.6 1096 963.2 9.732420048
225 1102.5 950 1100 967.5 17.67766953
226 1107.4 946.4 1104 971.8 25.62654873
227 1112.3 942.8 1108 976.1 33.57647986
228 1117.2 939.2 1112 980.4 41.52685878
229 1122.1 935.6 1116 984.7 49.47746962
230 1127 932 1120 989 57.42821606
231 1131.9 928.4 1124 993.3 65.37904863
232 1136.8 924.8 1128 997.6 73.32993932
233 1141.7 921.2 1132 1001.9 81.28087106
234 1146.6 917.6 1136 1006.2 89.23183288
235 1151.5 914 1140 1010.5 97.18281741
236 1156.4 910.4 1144 1014.8 105.1338195
237 1161.3 906.8 1148 1019.1 113.0848354
238 1166.2 903.2 1152 1023.4 121.0358625
239 1171.1 899.6 1156 1027.7 128.9868986
240 1176 896 1160 1032 136.9379421
241 1180.9 892.4 1164 1036.3 144.888992
242 1185.8 888.8 1168 1040.6 152.8400471
243 1190.7 885.2 1172 1044.9 160.7911067
244 1195.6 881.6 1176 1049.2 168.7421702
245 1200.5 878 1180 1053.5 176.693237
246 1205.4 874.4 1184 1057.8 184.6443067
247 1210.3 870.8 1188 1062.1 192.595379
248 1215.2 867.2 1192 1066.4 200.5464535
249 1220.1 863.6 1196 1070.7 208.49753
250 1225 860 1200 1075 216.4486082
251 1229.9 856.4 1204 1079.3 224.3996881
252 1234.8 852.8 1208 1083.6 232.3507693
253 1239.7 849.2 1212 1087.9 240.3018518
254 1244.6 845.6 1216 1092.2 248.2529355
255 1249.5 842 1220 1096.5 256.2040203
256 1254.4 838.4 1224 1100.8 264.155106
257 1259.3 834.8 1228 1105.1 272.1061925
258 1264.2 831.2 1232 1109.4 280.0572799
259 1269.1 827.6 1236 1113.7 288.0083679
260 1274 824 1240 1118 295.9594567
261 1278.9 820.4 1244 1122.3 303.910546
262 1283.8 816.8 1248 1126.6 311.861636
263 1288.7 813.2 1252 1130.9 319.8127265
264 1293.6 809.6 1256 1135.2 327.7638174
265 1298.5 806 1260 1139.5 335.7149088
266 1303.4 802.4 1264 1143.8 343.6660006
267 1308.3 798.8 1268 1148.1 351.6170929
268 1313.2 795.2 1272 1152.4 359.5681855
269 1318.1 791.6 1276 1156.7 367.5192784
270 1323 788 1280 1161 375.4703717
271 1327.9 784.4 1284 1165.3 383.4214652
272 1332.8 780.8 1288 1169.6 391.3725591
273 1337.7 777.2 1292 1173.9 399.3236532
274 1342.6 773.6 1296 1178.2 407.2747476
275 1347.5 770 1300 1182.5 415.2258422
276 1352.4 766.4 1304 1186.8 423.176937
277 1357.3 762.8 1308 1191.1 431.128032
278 1362.2 759.2 1312 1195.4 439.0791273
279 1367.1 755.6 1316 1199.7 447.0302227
280 1372 752 1320 1204 454.9813183
281 1376.9 748.4 1324 1208.3 462.9324141
282 1381.8 744.8 1328 1212.6 470.88351
283 1386.7 741.2 1332 1216.9 478.8346061
284 1391.6 737.6 1336 1221.2 486.7857023
285 1396.5 734 1340 1225.5 494.7367987
286 1401.4 730.4 1344 1229.8 502.6878952
287 1406.3 726.8 1348 1234.1 510.6389919
288 1411.2 723.2 1352 1238.4 518.5900886
289 1416.1 719.6 1356 1242.7 526.5411855
290 1421 716 1360 1247 534.4922825
291 1425.9 712.4 1364 1251.3 542.4433795
292 1430.8 708.8 1368 1255.6 550.3944767
293 1435.7 705.2 1372 1259.9 558.345574
294 1440.6 701.6 1376 1264.2 566.2966714
295 1445.5 698 1380 1268.5 574.2477688
296 1450.4 694.4 1384 1272.8 582.1988664
297 1455.3 690.8 1388 1277.1 590.149964
298 1460.2 687.2 1392 1281.4 598.1010617
299 1465.1 683.6 1396 1285.7 606.0521595
300 1470 680 1400 1290 614.0032573
-
Aw, come on Dave! That's nothing but numbers. Stop trying to scare people. And why is line 223 in the data twice?
-
goal seek to find the lowest possible d as a function of the variables in the original worksheet.
it's actually aset of really simple linear formulas, it was just the first large sampling I could find.
-
what's d? I don't want to read everything above.
-
distance between two bodies as they move toward (and then away from) each other at different trajectories/rates
-
What about bessel functions? Would you be better at bessel functions than Tom?
-
Aw, come on Dave! That's nothing but numbers. Stop trying to scare people. And why is line 223 in the data twice?
Hey Julie,
This is me over here! I didn't put those numbers up there, Andy did.
Also, I love you.
-
Bessel functions have something to do with drum heads, right?
Curse you, aging brain!
-
This thread just got awesome!!
-
Solving Bernoulli Bore-noulli equations
Fixed!
[/quote]
I don't think this response was given the proper kudos. You did it again, Wes.
-
Aw, come on Dave! That's nothing but numbers. Stop trying to scare people. And why is line 223 in the data twice?
Hey Julie,
This is me over here! I didn't put those numbers up there, Andy did.
Also, I love you.
Sorry, Dave. Shame on Andy. I love both of you.
Bessel functions have something to do with drum heads, right?
Curse you, aging brain!
Yes, I think they have to do with the motion of drum heads when you hit them with a drumstick. But I don't know and I'm not looking it up.
-
Solving Bernoulli Bore-noulli equations
Fixed!
I don't think this response was given the proper kudos. You did it again, Wes.
[/quote]
Ouch. Nobody warned me not to pet the kitty.
-
We really killed this thread dead when we brought the math.
-
internal rate of return for investment in an MBA (allegedly)
OOP w/o MBA w/ MBA NET
1 $(5,000.00) $(25,200.00) $- $(30,200.00) -22536.46357 IRR
2 $(5,000.00) $(25,704.00) $- $(30,704.00) -17098.28715 34%
3 $(26,218.08) $49,000.00 $22,781.92 9467.314311
4 $(26,742.44) $49,980.00 $23,237.56 7206.191383
5 $(27,277.29) $50,979.60 $23,702.31 5485.103012
6 $(27,822.84) $51,999.19 $24,176.36 4175.070221
7 $(28,379.29) $53,039.18 $24,659.88 3177.918685
8 $(28,946.88) $54,099.96 $25,153.08 2418.921512
9 $(29,525.82) $55,181.96 $25,656.14 1841.199181
10 $(30,116.33) $56,285.60 $26,169.26 1401.456974
11 $(30,718.66) $57,411.31 $26,692.65 1066.740454
12 $(31,333.03) $58,559.54 $27,226.50 811.9658456
13 $(31,959.69) $59,730.73 $27,771.03 618.0402475
14 $(32,598.89) $60,925.34 $28,326.45 470.4308063
15 $(33,250.86) $62,143.85 $28,892.98 358.075618
16 $(33,915.88) $63,386.72 $29,470.84 272.5547444
17 $(34,594.20) $64,654.46 $30,060.26 207.4592209
18 $(35,286.08) $65,947.55 $30,661.46 157.9107654
19 $(35,991.81) $67,266.50 $31,274.69 120.1961992
20 $(36,711.64) $68,611.83 $31,900.19 91.48917916
21 $(37,445.87) $69,984.07 $32,538.19 69.63839086
22 $(38,194.79) $71,383.75 $33,188.96 53.00632847
23 $(38,958.69) $72,811.42 $33,852.73 40.34657928
24 $(39,737.86) $74,267.65 $34,529.79 30.71041717
25 $(40,532.62) $75,753.00 $35,220.39 23.37570469
26 $(41,343.27) $77,268.06 $35,924.79 17.79277588
27 $(42,170.14) $78,813.43 $36,643.29 13.54324405
28 $(43,013.54) $80,389.69 $37,376.15 10.30864777
29 $(43,873.81) $81,997.49 $38,123.68 7.846585238
30 $(44,751.29) $83,637.44 $38,886.15 5.972548609
31 $(45,646.31) $85,310.19 $39,663.87 4.546096908
32 $(46,559.24) $87,016.39 $40,457.15 3.460331335
33 $(47,490.42) $88,756.72 $41,266.29 2.633884228
34 $(48,440.23) $90,531.85 $42,091.62 2.004821347
35 $(49,409.04) $92,342.49 $42,933.45 1.526000493
$989,606.10 2.7403E-06
-
The snobby engineering students in my calculus classes used to tell this joke.
What is the limit as an engineering student's gpa goes to zero?
Business School! :D
They all amounted to nothing, too.
-
smuggling myself across the Russian border in a car.
-
Hey - you math people might like the movie Proof.
-
Hey - you math people might like the movie Proof.
Fuckin' Russell Crowe was too unbelievable as, I don't know, some South African go-to guy? Leave that shit to Leo Dicaprio.
-
Hey - you math people might like the movie Proof.
Haven't seen it, but I'll put it in the queue.
-
I'd be better at speaking Japanese than Tom.
-
Hey - you math people might like the movie Proof.
I hate hate hate that play. Because the math could have been anything! It could have been the dead father's long-lost unsolved fart! In fact, that would have been better.
Keep the numbers going, though, please. I'm kind of into it.
-
Hey - you math people might like the movie Proof.
I hate hate hate that play. Because the math could have been anything! It could have been the dead father's long-lost unsolved fart! In fact, that would have been better.
I agree. I prefer my plays to be much more mathematically rigorous.
I've been workshopping a script that deals with quantum physics and Gödel and how, like, everything's uncertain.
-
This one's just for Groteface.
The square of 63? 3969.
But here's the kicker than makes it so hot.....I did that in my head!
-
This one's just for Groteface.
The square of 63? 3969.
But here's the kicker than makes it so hot.....I did that in my head!
Oh Snap!
-
Hey - you math people might like the movie Proof.
I hate hate hate that play. Because the math could have been anything! It could have been the dead father's long-lost unsolved fart! In fact, that would have been better.
Keep the numbers going, though, please. I'm kind of into it.
I agree with you and I hate the way mathematicians have replaced mad scientists as the symbol of tortured geniuses. What about people who write plays?
-
This one's just for Groteface.
The square of 63? 3969.
But here's the kicker than makes it so hot.....I did that in my head!
Could you have found the square root of 3969 in your head?
-
Of course
-
This one's just for Groteface.
The square of 63? 3969.
But here's the kicker than makes it so hot.....I did that in my head!
Could you have found the square root of 3969 in your head?
I could now.
-
To how many digits could you calculate the square root of 4,570,243 IN YOUR HEAD?
No cheating.
You can think about it next time you take a dump. Let me know what you come up with.
-
2137.81266719046 was as far as I could get. not too shabby for a business school dummy.
-
You can think about it next time you take a dump. Let me know what you come up with.
Hey, save that kind of talk for the colon cleanse thread.
-
You can think about it next time you take a dump. Let me know what you come up with.
Hey, save that kind of talk for the colon cleanse thread.
You clean your colon with a thread? I'm not judging you, but I think that's weird.
-
You can think about it next time you take a dump. Let me know what you come up with.
Hey, save that kind of talk for the colon cleanse thread.
You clean your colon with a thread? I'm not judging you, but I think that's weird.
What, you didn't see Crumb?
-
2137.81266719046 was as far as I could get. not too shabby for a business school dummy.
Wow! I'm so impressed! Just think what you could do if you weren't a business school dummy!
-
You can think about it next time you take a dump. Let me know what you come up with.
Hey, save that kind of talk for the colon cleanse thread.
You clean your colon with a thread? I'm not judging you, but I think that's weird.
Some yogis use a rope:
http://books.google.com/books?id=SKrnshWJ4-wC&pg=PA355&lpg=PA355&dq=yogi+rope+intestinal+cleansing&source=web&ots=QGwx1yzarK&sig=AJKV4Va4mGWNJfb8I1Hr1sEzw3A&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=8&ct=result (http://books.google.com/books?id=SKrnshWJ4-wC&pg=PA355&lpg=PA355&dq=yogi+rope+intestinal+cleansing&source=web&ots=QGwx1yzarK&sig=AJKV4Va4mGWNJfb8I1Hr1sEzw3A&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=8&ct=result)
-
being full of hot air
-
Rooting for a successful NBA team.