Author Topic: Watchmen Trailer!  (Read 25988 times)

Gilly

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2110
Re: Watchmen Trailer!
« Reply #120 on: March 15, 2009, 05:36:23 PM »
I liked it a lot.

Matt C

  • Policemans heel
  • Posts: 85
Re: Watchmen Trailer!
« Reply #121 on: March 20, 2009, 03:05:10 PM »
I still haven't seen it, probably wait until the DVD, but the changes are a turn-off.


erechoveraker

  • Guest
Re: Watchmen Trailer!
« Reply #122 on: March 20, 2009, 03:09:07 PM »
The changes aren't really what's wrong with the movie. I was thinking I almost wanted to see it again, even though I didn't really dig it the first time, and then I read this: http://www.aintitcool.com/node/40409

Yikes.



EDIT - Oh I dummy. I get joke now.

Wes

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 703
Re: Watchmen Trailer!
« Reply #123 on: March 29, 2009, 07:58:21 PM »
Finally got around to seeing this - I was suprised how they got the Dr. Manhattan parts down so well but ended up kind of undercutting Rorschach in the way they changed and reduced his parts. I would have expected that to have worked out the other way around. I think they butchered Veidt, too. Curious choice, to recast Ozymandias as Archie from The Chocolate War.


My biggest problems were the music, as others have noted (especially The Sounds of Silence), the weirdly amped up violence and the way everybody was kicking people through walls and across the rooms like they were all in The Matrix and all the added Rubberface Nixon scenes. Weird that you can make Dr. Manhattan look that good and yet Nixon looked like Dan Aykroyd in Nothing But Trouble.
This may be the year I will disappear.

wwwes

  • Tarsel tunnel syndrome
  • Posts: 309
Re: Watchmen Trailer!
« Reply #124 on: July 22, 2009, 02:45:20 AM »
Finally saw the movie on PPV. The movie was definitely not that brave and overstylized everything. But that was all fixable and arguably would have been insisted upon no matter who made it. What was not fixable was bad tone and bad casting in a lot of areas.

Overall, the movie was too often designed to be acted and viewed like it was an old 40s film noir flick, which is fair, because the book gives that impression, but when Rorschach's mother told him she should have aborted him and it sounded like it was straight out of The Hudsucker Proxy, you knew nothing in the movie could possibly be taken that seriously. They should have taken the emotional theme of this movie in equal parts from Dr. Strangelove, Oz, and the penultimate episode of every season in The Wire.

And why was it necessary to hire young men and women made up to play parts 20 years older than they are so that they could take like three photographs and ten minutes of background footage of them when they were younger? Adrian Veidt looked like a 12 year old in a well-funded children's production of Our Town. Even The Comedian, who was easily the best at looking realistic in various ages, looked like he was going to get the latex knocked off his face in the first scene.

Alternately, they should have just decided to go in completely the opposite direction and gone full-blown Southland Tales. Having the guy who played Kramer's friend in Seinfeld was a good start, but they didn't go far enough. Kenan Thompson as the prison psychiatrist. Bob Odenkirk and David Cross as the detectives. The mom from The Facts of Life as Sally Jupiter. Adrian Grenier AS VINCENT CHASE playing the sleazy investigative reporter. At least that would have been fun as an exercise in how angry and grizzled you can make Alan Moore seem.

Either that or I think I might have liked to see Werner Herzog somehow forced to make this movie against his will. I think his concept of superheroes would have been a perfect fit.