Author Topic: discussion of improv groups and stuff I guess.  (Read 2530 times)

John Junk 2.0

  • Guest
discussion of improv groups and stuff I guess.
« on: April 29, 2008, 03:01:23 PM »
Some improv groups seem better than others, and smarter than others.  I've only seen maybe eight different improv groups at UCB L.A. and I assume they have a specific sensibility that would be different than improv stuff elsewhere,  (like "Improv Olympics"--?) but I've noticed that I like it when there are more older people in a group.  The humor is generally more sophisticated (I think...) and less jokes about mom-fucking and dead babies and moms fucking dead babies and all the other naughty things that you think are funny when you're too old to be scared of stuff like that and too young to know that life is a precious flower and that dead baby fucking isn't all that hilarious.  Does anyone know what I'm talking about?  Thoughts?

dave from knoxville

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 5108
Re: discussion of improv groups and stuff I guess.
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2008, 03:59:53 PM »
You have my most earnest "here here!" Of course, you can imagine the quality of improv we get in East Tennessee. Like a pornographic version of Bazooka Joe comics.

yesno

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3426
Re: discussion of improv groups and stuff I guess.
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2008, 04:10:32 PM »
Improv is one of those things that I like, but that I leave it to other people to sort through and tell me what's good.

ericluxury

  • Tarsel tunnel syndrome
  • Posts: 296
Re: discussion of improv groups and stuff I guess.
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2008, 04:26:40 PM »
I've been to a fair amount of improv at the Original UCB Theatre. When its the weekend shows and its one of the older groups, it's definitely better.
I had a friend taking classes there and I went with her to the Tuesday Harold Night where they have newer groups do a half-hour and you see maybe 4 groups. It's a fast-paced enough show with probably the easiest crowd I've ever seen at a comedy show. But its amazing how often the same old things get thrown around with someone mentioning an old bad celebrity as a punchline or a guy going stereotypically gay. You can't really fault the performers when the crowd eats that shit up so readily. The easiest way to a laugh in improv seems to be going extremely silly, which is why a Jack McBrayer or an Andy Daly or Matt Besser are so good because they can do that with either a disarming sweetness or a bitterness that can elevate everything so that it doesn't seem like a trick.

That said, I've only been to improv at the UCB and at its worst, its never been boring or terribly unfunny. That's quite a feat when you look at every other comedy spot in NYC and then realize that comedy around the country is often even worse.

Reading back, this is the most pessimistic way to ever say that most shows at UCB are pretty good.

samir

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 1652
Re: discussion of improv groups and stuff I guess.
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2008, 04:39:14 PM »
I performed a lot in college - our group had a self-written rule to not drop F-bombs.
There's something a lot more satisfying about getting a laugh for talking about the Maginot Line or Alec Guinness than "wait, he's gay!"
"Son, there's a thin line between crazed and rabid"


iAmBaronVonTito

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3037
Re: discussion of improv groups and stuff I guess.
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2008, 05:19:20 PM »
I performed a lot in college - our group had a self-written rule to not drop F-bombs.
There's something a lot more satisfying about getting a laugh for talking about the Maginot Line or Alec Guinness than "wait, he's gay!"


i can appreciate that rule, samir. 

for me, it boils down to pushing my own limits in order to accomplish my best end product; dropping any kind of bomb requires little to no thought in 2008.