What is the FOT opinion on:
* Unbalanced schedule
* Interleague play
I have no strong opinion on the unbalanced schedule. It achieves a kind of parity through its very unfairness. It's the wrong kind of parity, though: you want more teams to be good, not bad teams making the playoffs. Anyway. But it seems like if you're going to have divisions an unbalanced schedule is not the end of the world. Why not just have the teams with the four best records in the league make the playoffs and get rid of divisions entirely? It's a structural unfairness but maybe a necessary one.
Unlike interleague play, where a lot of the "unfairness" that's complained about is just dumb scheduling. If there were a way to fix the scheduling to avoid unfairness, I don't see how there's room to complain. I don't see how you could do that, though, short of making every team in a division play all the same opponents, which is probably impossible. I really don't like the "boring matchups" argument against interleague. The matchups aren't boring to the fans of those teams, for one. It's inherently interesting for me to see a matchup between my team and a team they rarely play, even if that team is not that great. (Neither is mine, but still.) It only seems to be the baseball press that disdains "boring" matchups; fans of the respective teams don't seem to mind them. And the "World Series should be the only interleague game" argument has a weird purity to it, but baseball is entertainment. We'll never get to see some matchups that way. There's no reason to forbid for eternity certain games in devotion to some abstract principle.