Author Topic: 2009 MLB Thread  (Read 105906 times)

hugman

  • Guest
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #630 on: September 02, 2009, 02:31:09 AM »
I think Lincecum is gonna get the Cy Young again. We'll see what happens in this big month for him. I love athletes that don't look like athletes. Seriously.

nec13

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2397
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #631 on: September 02, 2009, 02:53:35 AM »
You must have been John Kruk's biggest fan then. In fact, that whole '93 Phillies team looked like (was) a bunch of unathletic schlubs.
Nobody ever lends money to a man with a sense of humor.

Trotskie

  • Tarsel tunnel syndrome
  • Posts: 314
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #632 on: September 02, 2009, 09:43:48 PM »


.

hugman

  • Guest
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #633 on: September 02, 2009, 11:47:30 PM »
You must have been John Kruk's biggest fan then. In fact, that whole '93 Phillies team looked like (was) a bunch of unathletic schlubs.

Nah, cuz he still looks like a total jock, albeit an out of shape one.
For instance, I LOVED when then clippers would have Cherokee Parks and Boinkins on the floor at the same time.  Total freakshow.  Watched them beat the lakers once. It was awesome.

chrisfoll577

  • Guest
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #634 on: September 03, 2009, 06:30:58 AM »
I know most of you guys are NL fans, but with Smoltz and now Penny's dominant returns to the National League, I'm going to just assume that a trade to a National League team is more statistically beneficial to an AL player than five steroid cycles.  I fully expect Jim Thome to hit at least 15 home runs this month.

scratchbomb

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 786
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #635 on: September 05, 2009, 10:07:58 PM »
I know most of you guys are NL fans, but with Smoltz and now Penny's dominant returns to the National League, I'm going to just assume that a trade to a National League team is more statistically beneficial to an AL player than five steroid cycles.  I fully expect Jim Thome to hit at least 15 home runs this month.

it's definitely beneficial to pitchers, to the tune of shaving at least 0.50 off your ERA. I've never seen any statistical indication that it's better for hitters. I feel like, if anything, it'd be neutral or detrimental, because starters stick around longer/stay strong longer when they face a weak hitting pitcher every nine spots in a lineup, as opposed to a DH. But that's my totally unscientific hypothesis.
scratchbomb.com: a potentially explosive collection of verbal irritants

nec13

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2397
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #636 on: September 06, 2009, 11:42:40 AM »
I agree with scratchbomb. And there's just more talent in the AL.
Nobody ever lends money to a man with a sense of humor.

chris v

  • Policemans heel
  • Posts: 69
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #637 on: September 15, 2009, 10:21:50 PM »
Cliff Lee pitches another gem & precious moments in the stands.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9a6Ni5ClXc&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

scratchbomb

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 786
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #638 on: September 16, 2009, 12:45:35 PM »
I can totally see my 2-year-old doing that, too.
scratchbomb.com: a potentially explosive collection of verbal irritants

Gilly

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2110
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #639 on: September 16, 2009, 06:25:06 PM »
Making a copyright claim?  ;D

nec13

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2397
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #640 on: September 28, 2009, 11:46:48 PM »
Anybody still watching or following baseball? It looks like there are still two races that bear watching, those being the AL Central and the NL Wild Card. The biggest series of the season will be the upcoming four game set between the Twins and Tigers, which begins with a double header tomorrow.
Nobody ever lends money to a man with a sense of humor.

Gilly

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2110
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #641 on: September 29, 2009, 01:48:24 AM »
This is where the Twins excel. They're pitching will fail in the postseason if they make it though. I just wish that one of these years they'll be proactive and make some good signings in the offseason. One big signing and they'd have run away with the central and have a good chance in the playoffs.

ben

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 520
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #642 on: September 29, 2009, 02:12:15 AM »
This is where the Twins excel. They're pitching will fail in the postseason if they make it though. I just wish that one of these years they'll be proactive and make some good signings in the offseason. One big signing and they'd have run away with the central and have a good chance in the playoffs.
I am a Brewers fan and a Wisconsinite, and generally have a 'friendly' rivalry with all things Minnesotan.  But the Twins do things right.  Stadium sucks, but that is a well run ball club.  Rooting for that squad.
Sounds like someone was working as a conduit for nature's natural vengeance.  Just like Jesus.  And some of the others.

Gilly

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2110
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #643 on: September 29, 2009, 03:02:13 AM »
I like the Brewers as well. The Twins do run a good squad but they are always one big signing away from winning it all. They have amazing coaches that equip them to win a weak division year after year but they need the ownership to step up to make them a real contender. But, it is nice as a huge baseball fan to have a team that stays good enough year after year. I had season tickets in the late 90's and that was rough, even though it was still awesome to watch baseball every night for next to nothing. Seriously, it was 82 dollars for the season ticket which was supposed to sit my friends and I in upper deck, right field. We sat right behind the Twins bullpen every game.

hugman

  • Guest
Re: 2009 MLB Thread
« Reply #644 on: September 29, 2009, 03:40:09 AM »
i'm still paying attention, of course. pretty damn unsure about Franklin. Other than that I feel good. We'll see what happens.