Like every reviewer or review team, you have to be able to decode their prejudices. The fact that they have legitimate music news is great and some good in-studio stuff and you can hear an artist while they are being reviewed is great. But they have tons of prejudices. The guy who worships Lester Bangs takes glee in shooting down any band with any hype and will always give a hyped band that is on their first or second album a bad review with no exceptions. Any toilet talk in a rock group is 'dark' and thus good while toilet talk in a rap record is something that he needs to hide from his daughter. The other guy is the more conservative Siskel to baby Bangs' Ebert (they even look like Siskel & Ebert, but please don't google image them. it will make it disgusting when they talk about how sexual a group is). He is more forgiving of older bands and newer rock bands but likes very little outside of his wheelhouse. I prefer him since he seems to respond more to music and less to the image of band/group.
If both of them like a rap record though, you can generally run the other direction very fast (example would be Tim Fite, who they can't stop talking about).
However, I think they have a very entertaining radio show.
