Author Topic: Theologicamol Questions  (Read 34647 times)

Phantom Hugger

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 510
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #120 on: April 01, 2009, 12:11:32 AM »
That Creation Museum in Kentucky is insane.

I know 'cuz we went.  It was a journalistic kind of thing.

Were I Dave From K-ville, I'd have similar reservations.

That place (Ken Ham) is pure and evil child abuse. Take the gloves off DFK, be as condescending to these medieval lunatics as is warranted. These are your children, don't let these monsters get their hooks into them.

ben

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 520
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #121 on: April 01, 2009, 12:27:34 AM »
What do you think of those crazy catholics?  Specifically:

Vatican II: Catholics frontin' on the Protestant tip?  Is it truly bad that the Bendedict seems to be backpedaling on it or do you think the backpedaling is necessary since if Catholicism is not blinkered and superstitious then it has no reason to exist?

Also, admit how much you hate Catholics.

You wear orange on St. Patricks day, don't you?
Sounds like someone was working as a conduit for nature's natural vengeance.  Just like Jesus.  And some of the others.

J. Garbage

  • Guest
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #122 on: April 01, 2009, 04:20:07 PM »
No, sir!  My attitude about catholicism is the kind that can only come from being raised by a dad who dropped out of the Jesuit monastery (and who still works at a Catholic private schools run by lesbian nuns in Newark) and a mom who dropped out of the convent (Vatican 2ers both).  I received communion as a favor from a priest to my dad because the local catholic school said I needed to take 4 years of bible school until they'd let me do it, which my dad thought was total bullshit. My family are very Kennedy-style "Good works" liberal-type catholics; the kind that barely exist anymore.  For this reason, none of us go to church because we just get lectured about abortion by people who don't have sex.  But it's what I am, man, I can't deny it! 

Come on, Jason

  • Guest
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #123 on: April 01, 2009, 09:49:00 PM »
Wow, Handburglar sounds like he could be my brother.  My dad was also a Jesuit:  he was the debate coach at Gonzaga in the early 60s.    My mom was also a nun!  They met, left the church for political/feminist reasons, moved to San Francisco in 1968, and I was raised without God, though they did baptize me to throw a bone at the extended family. 

So that's me! 

This post didn't contain any questions.

Steve of Bloomington

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2262
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #124 on: April 01, 2009, 10:23:58 PM »
I had the hardcore Catholic education Gr. 1-6, then Jesuit H.S.

Then I just did my own thing.

Shaggy 2 Grote

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3892
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #125 on: April 02, 2009, 12:47:43 PM »
Why do you say it's more believable? 

Touche -- you've managed to out-postmodern me.  Of course the Hebrew (or Christian) reinterpretation of Job is just as real as the "authentic" original version from Assyria or wherever.  My initial impression was that the idea of a savage, feudal, desert-nomad God in Job was somehow more "realistic" to me than the idea of a loving God, as in Christianity (or more modern interpretations thereof).  But of course, there's no such thing as "revisionism" in this context -- religious texts are always fluid and historically contingent, and always subject to whatever readings believers endow them with.  There's no such thing as a "real" or "invalid" interpretation, just stronger and weaker cases.

My wife is a big Zizek fan, but I haven't read any of his stuff.  I'll check him out.  Any particular books you'd recommend?

Welcome to the Desert of the Real and the Astra Taylor documentary Zizek! are probably good places to get a general idea of his schtick (and it is a schtick, but I love it).  The Puppet and The Dwarf is explicitly about Christianity, and not too long or dense for a book of theory.

Oh, good heavens. I didn’t realize. I send my condolences out to the rest of the O’Connor family.

nec13

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2397
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #126 on: April 02, 2009, 12:57:19 PM »
Pastor Josh,

I posted this video in the Glenn Beck thread. I am interested in hearing your thoughts on it.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNNtdgZafFM[/youtube]
Nobody ever lends money to a man with a sense of humor.

Pastor Josh

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 599
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #127 on: April 02, 2009, 01:18:35 PM »
Pastor Josh,

I posted this video in the Glenn Beck thread. I am interested in hearing your thoughts on it.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNNtdgZafFM[/youtube]

I really can't stand Glen Beck, and as soon as I hear the phrase "End of Days" I turned it off.  That's all BS.  Sorry, Regulator Guy, but not even for you can I listen to seven minutes of Glen Beck talking about the end of days.  Was there something particular in it you'd like me to comment on?  All that "end of days" stuff is crap.  As I mentioned earlier, apocalyptic was a specific genre in the ancient world, and those who wrote and read it understood it to be talking about their own times, not future ones.  The texts were anti-Rome, and who is Rome now if not us?  Rome is not a collection of unaffilaited, somewhat theocratic nations in the middle east that can barely keep their people fed.  It's kind of stupid for us to hold up a book about God destroying Rome as a central text.  Does that help?  Again, sorry, but my stomach can't take Glen Beck.
Who I don't have chocolate?

nec13

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2397
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #128 on: April 02, 2009, 01:54:10 PM »
That's cool Pastor Josh. I completely understand. I don't like the fearmongering either. But thanks for trying to answer my question anyway.
Nobody ever lends money to a man with a sense of humor.

Pastor Josh

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 599
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #129 on: April 02, 2009, 04:00:05 PM »
That's cool Pastor Josh. I completely understand. I don't like the fearmongering either. But thanks for trying to answer my question anyway.

If you can give me something specific to comment on, or like the time mark of something said on the video to comment on, I will.  But sorry, man, I just can't walk into the gates of hell.
Who I don't have chocolate?

nec13

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2397
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #130 on: April 02, 2009, 04:39:11 PM »
That's alright. You basically answered my question already. I don't really care enough about Glenn Beck to pursue the matter any further.
Nobody ever lends money to a man with a sense of humor.

chrysta

  • Policemans heel
  • Posts: 52
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #131 on: April 02, 2009, 10:20:58 PM »
Great thread. I'm reminded of my friend's (Lutheran pastor, I think) dad who once compared religion to a pizzeria.

In other words, people in positions of authority in my church use crazy backwards approaches to biblical inerrancy to defend their actions. I need help in addressing these folks without seeming all condescending about it

This is kind of what I'm wondering about. 1) Like, what's the most respectful way of dealing with situations in which certain types of religious folk insist I'm going to hell/purgatory because of my (apathetic Roman Catholic/lazy reform Jewish) upbringing/(agnostic-y Jewish) current beliefs? Usually I go with something like, "I appreciate your concern, but there's no hell in my religion." At least no one's made me a Rapture kit, as my mom's coworker did for her.

And 2) What's the most respectful way of dealing with people whose only argument against sexual minorities is that their interpretation of the Bible tells them it's wrong? Jesus seems like he'd probably be all, "Brothers and sisters, chill out" to folks on either side, but that's not a compelling argument. I don't expect to change anyone's mind, but if you could point me in the direction of Bible passages or books that could make for a, like, more productive discussion, it'd be appreciated. All that comes to mind for me is "judge not, lest ye be judged", which is my jam but doesn't seem to translate to the anti-GLBT crowd.

Pastor Josh

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 599
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #132 on: April 03, 2009, 11:48:53 AM »
Why do you say it's more believable? 

Touche -- you've managed to out-postmodern me.  Of course the Hebrew (or Christian) reinterpretation of Job is just as real as the "authentic" original version from Assyria or wherever.  My initial impression was that the idea of a savage, feudal, desert-nomad God in Job was somehow more "realistic" to me than the idea of a loving God, as in Christianity (or more modern interpretations thereof).  But of course, there's no such thing as "revisionism" in this context -- religious texts are always fluid and historically contingent, and always subject to whatever readings believers endow them with.  There's no such thing as a "real" or "invalid" interpretation, just stronger and weaker cases.

My wife is a big Zizek fan, but I haven't read any of his stuff.  I'll check him out.  Any particular books you'd recommend?

Welcome to the Desert of the Real and the Astra Taylor documentary Zizek! are probably good places to get a general idea of his schtick (and it is a schtick, but I love it).  The Puppet and The Dwarf is explicitly about Christianity, and not too long or dense for a book of theory.



I'll check those out.  I think my wife actually has Welcome to the Desert of the Real, actaully.  And the first part of your post was briallintly put.  I hope you didn't mean it as a parody of Post-Modernism, which has it's own special relationship with Poe's Law.  I think you're absolutely right.  There's no way we can enter the world in which the texts were first told, so we can't uncover any kind of original meaning.  We just have to do our best with what we have.
Who I don't have chocolate?

Pastor Josh

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 599
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #133 on: April 03, 2009, 12:09:55 PM »
Great thread. I'm reminded of my friend's (Lutheran pastor, I think) dad who once compared religion to a pizzeria.

In other words, people in positions of authority in my church use crazy backwards approaches to biblical inerrancy to defend their actions. I need help in addressing these folks without seeming all condescending about it

This is kind of what I'm wondering about. 1) Like, what's the most respectful way of dealing with situations in which certain types of religious folk insist I'm going to hell/purgatory because of my (apathetic Roman Catholic/lazy reform Jewish) upbringing/(agnostic-y Jewish) current beliefs? Usually I go with something like, "I appreciate your concern, but there's no hell in my religion." At least no one's made me a Rapture kit, as my mom's coworker did for her.

And 2) What's the most respectful way of dealing with people whose only argument against sexual minorities is that their interpretation of the Bible tells them it's wrong? Jesus seems like he'd probably be all, "Brothers and sisters, chill out" to folks on either side, but that's not a compelling argument. I don't expect to change anyone's mind, but if you could point me in the direction of Bible passages or books that could make for a, like, more productive discussion, it'd be appreciated. All that comes to mind for me is "judge not, lest ye be judged", which is my jam but doesn't seem to translate to the anti-GLBT crowd.

As for the fiirst question, the only thing I can recommend is going back to Jesus.  Jesus never, ever condemned anyone.  He just welcomed.  He never even said tht people had to stop doing whatever it was that everyone else considered sinning (tax collecting, prostitution, being handicapped), before they could join him.  Jesus did not use fear as a weapon.  Ever.  Fear cannot create love, and if so-called Christians are trying to frighten someone into coming to God, then they aren't WWJD-ing.  Jesus simply loved people, and it is through being loved that we come to recognize what God wants for us.  Fear of hell or greed for heavem can't lead into authentic relationship with God.  Get familiar with how Jesus approached others and hold others accountable for how they apporach you in Jesus' name.

As for the second question, it's a bit more complicated.  The OT condemns "a man lying with another man as he would with a woman", which I would argue is different from homosexuality, and Paul seems to condemn homosexuality in general.  (Sodom and Gomorrah have nothing to do with the gay.  Even Paul read them as being about hospitality.  See my first answer for a reason contemporary Christians might not want to be judged on their hospitality.)  Three verse in all of scripture that in some way seem to condemn homosexuality.  The best way forward is, yep, to know your scripture.  First, whip out Leviticus 19:19 (or pretty much nay random verse in Leviticus, but this one is especially good), and ask them if they stick with that.  Then ask if they belive homosexuals should be put to death, because the bible says they should.  If not, then they aren't taking the bible literally and can't use it as a defense for their own xenophobia.  If they say yes, then run, because they are insane.  But then we can bring in other biblical studies.  The bible is self-redacting.  Check out Deuteronomy 23:1 and contrast it with Acts 8:26-40.  The Jesus-centered community welcomes in those that even the scriptures say are unwelcome.  The Eunuch isn't healed of his condition, but he is still baptized into the church, despite the teachings of scripture.   I don't see how we could have any clearer a model than this.

Beyond this, there are more complicated debates about sexuality and such.  I don't think the ancients had a concept of homosexuality like we do.  I don't think they knew that some people are oriented homosexually.  Instead, they saw homosexual acts as a violation of God-given sexuality, sex for pleasure alone rather than in the context of building and covenental relationship.  If this is true, then a gay person trying to be straight is also a violation of God-given sexuality.  As always, Jesus died to take away our sins, not our brains.  We're still expected to use them.  Answers are always complicted.  Christians right now are so obsessed with the sex they aren't having.  So many of us are so condemnatory.  We have lost our basis in Jesus, I'm afraid, and that can't be good.  Isaiah has a lot to say to folks who claim to be God's people but don't act like it.
Who I don't have chocolate?

Julie

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 830
Re: Theologicamol Questions
« Reply #134 on: April 03, 2009, 12:25:55 PM »
Pastor Josh,

Please enlighten me!

First, what is standard treatment for churchaphobia? I feel like a freak. It even happens at church rummage sales. Have you come across many cases of this? I'm embarrassed to ask my doctor and I'm not joking.

Second, how could I find something to believe in? What sort of brain processes are involved when you take a leap of faith? Is there a secret way to trick yourself?

Third, I am terrified of ghosts but don't believe in them. Do you believe in ghosts?

Thank you,

Julie
I have a long history of booing