Quote from: Trembling Eagle on October 04, 2013, 12:55:27 AMWhat don't you like about Tarantino Mike?His work is derivative and immature.
What don't you like about Tarantino Mike?
Quote from: B_Buster on October 04, 2013, 11:53:58 AMQuote from: Trembling Eagle on October 04, 2013, 12:55:27 AMWhat don't you like about Tarantino Mike?His work is derivative and immature.Does it not matter to you he's doing that on purpose?
Quote from: cavorting with nudists on September 30, 2013, 07:27:09 PMAnd whatever the virtues of Badfinger or "Baby Blue," I just thought that was a plain bad choice that didn't work at all, the first time I can remember thinking that about one of their musical selections.I was so stoked when Baby Blue came on. The first line of the song is "I guess I got what I deserved" and plays as Walt lovingly stares at the chemistry equipment. It was perfect!
And whatever the virtues of Badfinger or "Baby Blue," I just thought that was a plain bad choice that didn't work at all, the first time I can remember thinking that about one of their musical selections.
Quote from: daveB from Oakland: Diablo Sandwich on October 02, 2013, 11:46:26 PMBadfinger got a big bump-up in the public consciousness. See, for those who are saying that song worked well in that place, I suspect this is really what it's about.
Badfinger got a big bump-up in the public consciousness.
Quote from: cavorting with nudists on October 03, 2013, 09:19:28 AMQuote from: daveB from Oakland: Diablo Sandwich on October 02, 2013, 11:46:26 PMBadfinger got a big bump-up in the public consciousness. See, for those who are saying that song worked well in that place, I suspect this is really what it's about.MIND READER AMONG US QUIT THINKING FOR GOD'S SAKE
Give The Adventures of Augie March a shot. It's amazing. Herzog was tough for me at first. I had a couple of false starts before I could get into it, but when I did I really enjoyed it. Humboldt's Gift is the other masterpiece.
...I suspect on some level this is part of the point of the The Realism Canard. That art in its size and complexity is too much to handle sometimes, and too troubling. That even though we say fiction's job is to take us out of ourselves, we don't really want to be pushed. So we must take it down a peg, to a point where it is beneath us and thus can be put in its place. And the easiest way to do this is to cross check it against "real life" and find it lacking. Take this piece about Breaking Bad in The New Inquiry. It has some interesting points to make about the show's racial politics, but before it can get there it, it must shrink the show to manageable size by trying to come up with ways that its depiction of the drug trade isn't "realistic," landing on the show's overemphasis on the purity of Walter's meth. Set aside that the author's critique of the show's purity emphasis on realism grounds is wrong (purity matters because Walt is a wholesaler and the purer his product is the more that it can be stepped on by the people he sells it to), and set aside that the purity matters for character reasons (no one has ever been able to do what Walt figures out). The accuracy question with regard to Breaking Bad is a complete sideshow. Breaking Bad is not a work of realism. Its aesthetic and language is highly stylized, and its plotting is all clockwork determinism, as anyone who has watched the second season can attest. It's not trying to exist in our world. It's trying to exist in its world. You might as well criticize it for having a sky that's yellower than ours.
What is that gif supposed to be?