Author Topic: General Movie Thread  (Read 1009599 times)

Jouster

  • Tarsel tunnel syndrome
  • Posts: 490
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #990 on: March 09, 2010, 06:31:26 AM »
I haven't seen Alice in Wonderland yet, but there was a noticeable difference in quality between Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (not a remake of Willy Wonka, despite the Oompa Loompa, though it had its problems) and Planet of the Apes (just dumb and bad).  Putting them side-by-side seems wrong to me.

Sarah

  • Guest
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #991 on: March 09, 2010, 08:20:32 AM »
I watched Watchmen yesterday.  Time Warner's blurb told me it was "gripping and transcendent," but I found it pretentious, prolix, muddy, and dull,* qualities all captured in the following remarkable sentence: "What nocturnal proclivities entice a man with everything out into the night at this hour?"  All in all, I think more of that blue penis that got everyone so flustered would have been an improvement.

Other movies viewed over the last couple of days:  RocknRolla (boring, but entertaining soundtrack), Pineapple Express (boring), Grand Theft Parsons (boring, but slightly less so and sweet to boot, and nice soundtrack).  There were more, but I can't remember them right now.  I enjoyed the marathon of American Gothic on Chiller much more than any of them.

*Oh, yeah--"silly" as well.  Mind you, I'm perfectly capable of enjoying foolishness (witness my pleasure in American Gothic); this example of it just didn't grab me.  Maybe if I'd read the graphic novel.  But then I'm sure I would have preferred the original, so what's the point?

bakersfieldchimp

  • Achilles bursitis
  • Posts: 131
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #992 on: March 09, 2010, 09:47:41 AM »
Went out to a showing of The Room last night-- I'd watched it on my computer, so my ladyfriend and I were prepared for how bad it was, but what we weren't prepared for was the Rocky Horror treatment it got from the audience, which balanced precariously on the fine line between being entertaining and being annoying (or frightening, when they knew the words to the songs in the sex scenes). It was worth it overall, though.

Reeleyes

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 609
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #993 on: March 09, 2010, 10:24:05 AM »
I haven't seen Alice in Wonderland yet, but there was a noticeable difference in quality between Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (not a remake of Willy Wonka, despite the Oompa Loompa, though it had its problems) and Planet of the Apes (just dumb and bad).  Putting them side-by-side seems wrong to me.

I agree that Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was better than Planet of the Apes but I think they are both low on my personal ranking of Burton's films.
You look like a really healthy Arthy Lang.

Sarah

  • Guest
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #994 on: March 09, 2010, 12:36:02 PM »
Sidenote:  This morning, as my sister was reporting to me that for the first time a woman had won the "Best Director" Oscar, she told me Bigelow had directed a movie called "The Footlocker."   Figured I'd share the laugh.

SJK

  • Tarsel tunnel syndrome
  • Posts: 306
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #995 on: March 09, 2010, 01:03:05 PM »
That's great! "Footlocker" would be the B movie equivalent made in Newbridge by Trent L Strauss accidentally starring Bryce and his lean-to. I'll leave it up to others on this board to imagine the plot.

I like that she made a film like Break Point and then over a long period of time came up with Hurt Locker. I found HL to be a very good film, depressing, but good.

JonFromMaplewood

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2372
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #996 on: March 09, 2010, 01:19:41 PM »
Re-watched Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones with my kids over the last two days.  Where's the line forming to slap George Lucas in the face?

These two films actually made me look forward to Revenge of the Sith.  It's Aguirre, Wrath of God in comparison.
"I'm riding the silence like John Cage up in this piece." -Tom Scharpling

Martin

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 3629
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #997 on: March 09, 2010, 01:24:28 PM »
Sidenote:  This morning, as my sister was reporting to me that for the first time a woman had won the "Best Director" Oscar, she told me Bigelow had directed a movie called "The Footlocker."   Figured I'd share the laugh.

I believe it was either Wes or Chris L who, on Twitter during the Oscars, cracked-wise something about "Lady Hurt Locker".

Chris L

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2780
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #998 on: March 09, 2010, 01:54:55 PM »
I believe it was either Wes or Chris L who, on Twitter during the Oscars, cracked-wise something about "Lady Hurt Locker".

Wes

  • Achilles Tendon Bursitis
  • Posts: 703
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #999 on: March 09, 2010, 02:30:35 PM »
I believe it was probably pretty much everybody who, on Twitter during the Oscars, cracked-wise something about "Lady Hurt Locker".

I think what I like best about Twitter is that, when something notable is on TV, it temporarily makes everybody become as unbearable as I am.

I finally got to see A Serious Man last weekend and thought it was great. It should have been the screenplay winner over The Hurt Locker, which was also great. I'll have to see it a few more times before thinking about bumping it ahead of my three favorite Coen movies from the other thread (Miller's Crossing, No Country, Raising Arizona), but I feel like it's right at that level. Their best ending?
This may be the year I will disappear.

buffcoat

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 6214
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #1000 on: March 09, 2010, 03:39:03 PM »

I think what I like best about Twitter is that, when something notable is on TV, it temporarily makes everybody become as unbearable as I am.


Aw, Wesley, give yourself more credit than that!
I really don't appreciate your sarcastic, anti-comedy tone, Bro!

Sarah

  • Guest
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #1001 on: March 09, 2010, 04:13:20 PM »
My sister said it in all innocence.  She has never heard the show, and she thought her mistake was funny only because she envisioned a movie about one of these:





I think what I like best about Twitter is that, when something notable is on TV, it temporarily makes everybody become as unbearable as I am.


Aw, Wesley, give yourself more credit than that!

And here I took it as a shameless fishing expedition.

dave from knoxville

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 5108
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #1002 on: March 10, 2010, 11:30:45 PM »
I have an odd world view that requires that I filter personal opinions about the worth of art through a web of numbers. I know, it makes no sense, and it's a nightmare at times to keep up with all the rules my head sets up for myself. Still, sometimes I post these lists if for no other reason than some people are either entertained by them, or at least dismayed in an entertaining way that stimulates discussion that frequently covers topics such as "Really?", and "Why don't you seek help?", and "I really feel sorry for you, but more for your loved ones."

So the deal here is that for 4 years I have been attempting to establish a listing of movie actors. For each actor, for each of their films, I assign a number that is a combination of the actor's prominence in a film, along with the quality of the film. I then cull out their best ten performances, and rank the actors according to this sum of scores for their ten best roles. I am hoping for some sort of "Accomplishment in film acting" measure. Maybe it doesn't mean anything, but I am compelled to do it, and further compelled to share it. I am working my way alphabetically, and am limiting my work currently to actors who are still pursuing the craft; that is, at the moments, actors who have appeared in at least one theatrical release in the last 3 years. So here's the top 100, although please be clear, it only covers letters A-Z. Note; this is in no way intended as a "best actors" list. I have no skills or credentials to even attempt such a thing.

100) Jacqueline Bissett 99) Alan Arkin 98) Hugh Grant 97) Kirsten Dunst 96) Woody Harrelson

95) Cameron Diaz 94) Michael Keaton 93) Ed Harris 92) Anne Bancroft 91) Colin Firth

90) Bruce Dern 89) Elliot Gould 88) Kevin Bacon 87) Lauren Bacall 86) James Garner

85) Julie Andrews 84) Val Kilmer 83) Helena Bonham-Carter 82) Keith Carradine 81) James Caan

80) Gabriel Byrne 79) Morgan Freeman 78) Catherine Keener 77) Antonio Banderas 76) Willem Dafoe

75) Jet Li 74) Sandrine Bonnaire 73) Ian Holm 72) Jennifer Jason Leigh 71) Jackie Chan

70) Jim Carrey 69) Samuel L Jackson 68) Jodie Foster 67) Peter Fonda 66) Ethan Hawke

65) Albert Brooks 64) Holly Hunter 63) Leslie Caron 62) Leonardo DiCaprio 61) John Hurt

60) Russell Crowe 59) Anjelica Huston 58) Anouk Aimee 57) Jessica Lange 56) Glenn Close

55) Isabelle Adjani 54) Matthew Broderick 53) Juliette Binoche 52) Faye Dunaway 51) Jeremy Irons

50) Richard Gere 49) Matt Dillon 48) Maggie Cheung 47) Emmanuelle Beart 46) Alan Bates

45) Kevin Kline 44) Dennis Hopper 43) Judy Davis 42) Tommy Lee Jones 41) Bob Hoskins

40) Ralph Fiennes 39) Ellen Burstyn 38) Daniel Auteuil 37) Jane Fonda 36) Mia Farrow

35) Laura Linney 34) Nicole Kidman 33) Isabelle Huppert 32) Tom Cruise 31) Ben Kingsley

30) Kevin Costner 29) Michael Douglas 28) Michael Caine 27) Bruno Ganz 26) George Clooney

25) William Hurt 24) Albert Finney 23) Gong Li 22) Diane Keaton 21) Mel Gibson

20) Anthony Hopkins 19) Tom Hanks 18) John Cusack 17) Jeff Bridges 16) Nicolas Cage

15) Richard Dreyfuss 14) Johnny Depp 13) Sean Connery 12) Julie Christie 11) Tony Leung

10) Harvey Keitel 9) Gerard Depardieu 8) Harrison Ford 7) Robert Duvall 6) Gene Hackman

5) Catherine Deneuve 4) Clint Eastwood 3) Dustin Hoffman 2) Woody Allen 1) Robert DeNiro

cutout

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 1276
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #1003 on: March 11, 2010, 04:41:02 PM »
It's been a long time since I've wondered, "why did  that movie get made?" But then just now I watched Taking Woodstock (Demetri Martin).

jbissell

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 1807
Re: General Movie Thread
« Reply #1004 on: March 11, 2010, 04:55:34 PM »